Help In These Times raise $10,000 in three weeks! Donate now!
Help this website survive! Donate to In These Times now!
PrintDiscuss
Features » October 1, 2003

The Bushite Strategy …

By Salim Muwakkil

Soup kitchen in Chicago.

Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller
A September report by the U.S. Census Bureau revealed that more than 1.3 million additional Americans fell into poverty last year, and children accounted for almost one-half of that rise, with more than 600,000 added to the ranks of the poor. What’s more, poverty among children under age 5 increased by a full percentage point, from 18.8 percent in 2001 to 19.8 percent in 2002. Analysts expect an increase in that percentage, as well as an even bleaker picture for African Americans, when the Census Bureau releases more detailed data later this month.

This rise in poverty reflects the overall weakness in the economy and in the labor market, says Sharon Parrott of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think-tank. More distressingly, it comes at a time when the Bush administration continues to shred an already tattered social safety net.

The Department of Health and Human Services, for instance, recently announced the continued decline in funding of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), which provides assistance to ease economic hardship and help parents find and keep jobs. Many of the families targeted by TANF are those with the young children who now are more likely to be living in poverty.

The connection between gaps in the safety net and increasing poverty is obvious, but by bankrupting the U.S. Treasury the Bush administration is rendering that link irrelevant. Were the stakes not so high it would be fascinating to sit back and watch just how far the Bush administration will go to achieve its right-wing agenda. Indeed, the administration, having squandered the national surplus, would have to add the government to the poverty rolls were it not for the forced beneficence of future generations.

With debt as far as the eye can see, some critics blame that calamity on the Bushites’ incompetence. But the agenda of the right wing always has been to de-legitimize government as an agent of social welfare. If the right can’t completely change the government’s mind (those darn congressional liberals), the next best thing is to make it domestically impotent.

Then, even if the American people, deeply hypnotized by the drone of corporate media, were to suddenly awaken to this nightmarish reality, it likely would be too late to do anything. After all, we would have to deal with the facts on the ground.

Much like the Iraq invasion. We were neoconned into invading Iraq and now we have to stay the course or chaos will erupt. The facts on the ground demand we compound our mistake by making it over and over again.

This motif is reflected in other Bushite policies: the war on drugs and the war on terrorism.

The Bush administration’s war on the poor is muted in the face of those other efforts, but it may turn out to be the most significant of all. The president’s public demand for $87 billion additional dollars to occupy and reconstruct Iraq has started the ball rolling in the opposite direction as Americans grow increasingly discontent.

With nearly every state facing fiscal difficulties, with unemployment insurance running out for jobless workers, with prescription drug prices hitting the roof, with anxieties about an overstretched military and under-funded veterans programs, the Bush administration’s focus on Iraq is incongruent.

For even the densest among us, it’s becoming clear that U.S. communities clamor in vain for federal assistance for education and infrastructure improvement as the Bushites cavalierly demand billions of our dollars to execute a poorly conceived military occupation.

The $87 billion could make life a lot easier for many Americans were it allocated to domestic problems. For example, it is seven-times what the government intends to spend on Title I for low-income schools—after the administration cut more than $6 billion from its No Child Left Behind bill. The Iraq request is more than the $36 billion we spend on homeland security, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

This shift of resources to foreign adventures is no mistake. Just as the ideologues are seeking to cut government out of resource distribution domestically, they are desperately seeking to impose it internationally, a true Pax Americana.

The Bushite neocons realize there will be some protest against increasing poverty rates and growing wealth disparities. But with the media in the hands of corporations, these ideologues likely are gambling that social protest will be muted and ineffective. Progressive forces must mobilize to ensure they lose that bet.
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Salim Muwakkil is a senior editor of In These Times, where he has worked since 1983. He is the host of "The Salim Muwakkil" show on WVON, Chicago's historic black radio station, and he wrote the text for the book HAROLD: Photographs from the Harold Washington Years.

More information about Salim Muwakkil
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    I use to believe that our country was about building from the foundation up, instead of the top down.  How long can this nation sustain itself if less than 5% of its inhabitants continue to accumulate a majority share of the wealth?  It just seems like common sense to me to reinvest in the people of this country in order to build a great nation.  Otherwise, no matter how much cosmetic work may be done, like all structures built upon weak foundations, the United States of America will eventually crumble and fall.

    Posted by Ms. Monica on Oct 1, 2003 at 9:22 PM

    This is a well written story. I wish it could receive a much wider circulation in the mainstream magazines as well. Often, it becomes difficult even to write a letter to the editor on topics like these- in the local newspapers. It is frustrating. On-line magazines like yours do a great, commendable service to those who try to alleviate the sufferings of the poor.

    Posted by Dr.Thyagarajan on Oct 1, 2003 at 10:27 PM

    This Administration, coming from a Washington (Federal hating) bashing position, is out to weaken the federal powers any way possible - witness what is happening in all domestic and foreign affairs.  This is NOT a coincidence - it is a big bisiness and neo-confederate conspiracy - an unbelivable treason case if were documented and tried.

    Posted by Dave on Oct 2, 2003 at 7:48 PM

    Great story!
    One of the underreported stories of the decade is the conservative agenda to bankrupt the federal government. . . Since Bush flatly stated this as a goal before he was elected [to do away with those pesky federal social welfare and environmental laws among other things], we can hardly be suprised that he is doing exactly what he set out to do.

    The real shock is that people seem to believe that our constitutional government magically sprang into being, and that our freedoms will magically stay put forever. As we have seen with that rediculous, odiously worded document the “USA Patriot Act”, it is far from certain that our American liberties are protected. Far from it, people like Ashcroft and Bush sound like the “Communist Pinko Scumbags” that we spent years fighting in the cold war [America: Love It Or Leave It].

    Therefore, when 30% of the homeless people in Silicon Valley actually hold fulltime jobs - but can’t afford even basic housing - we have to seriously ask ourselves why we are allowing our beautiful nation to be run into the ground.

    Bush’s silver spoon needs to be inserted to a much more meaningful place than his mouth before he fully realizes what a working family goes through every day in this country just to survive. I know plenty of nice wealthy people, and none of them see a need to steal money from fellow Americans who are already destitute. . .
    Why does our President?

    Posted by Ed Mellon on Oct 2, 2003 at 10:32 PM

    I am always disgusted when I hear Pat Buchanan say “Neoconned” or the “Neos”. Shameful anti-semitism. Sorry to see it here as well.

    And can somebody stop using the stupid metaphor of “War”. “War on drugs”, “War on the Poor”. I realize the hard right and hard left have to pump up their articles but please give us something original!

    Good article though.

    Posted by Koppy on Oct 2, 2003 at 10:58 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 11 posts.

Appeared in the October 27, 2003 Issue
Also by Salim Muwakkil
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS