Bill Ayers speaks out! An In These Times exclusive.

PrintDiscuss
Features » October 3, 2003

Free Arianna

By Cliff Rothman

Arianna Huffington

I’m thinking of printing a new T-shirt—Free Arianna—to go on the rack next to the Martha Stewart version.

That society sets a double standard for power and gender is nothing new, but recently I’ve experienced it up close and personal and it’s pretty disturbing.

As a journalist, I’ve worked with Arianna Huffington, the candidate for California governor, who withdrew from the race in an effort to help prevent an Arnold Schwarzenegger victory. As an activist, I was involved in helping her in organizing The Shadow Convention here in 2000. I also am her friend.

As I watched Martha Stewart skewered in the press and by the government, I experienced a visceral indignation. If she were not a strong, powerful woman, even her obvious hot buttons would not have elicited the widespread animosity and desire to punish her.

And I’ve watched it happening again with Huffington. Since she and Arnold Schwarzenegger announced their candidacy on the same day, the press has slathered all over Arnold, while it directed a steady barrage of slurs at Huffington: She’s a bad mother. She’s a hypocrite. She’s a tax dodger. She’s an opportunist. She’s reinvented herself.

The Huffington portrayed in the media is like something out of the Twilight Zone. Those who know her marvel at her aptitude and public consciousness. Discounting the esteem in which we hold her, she is on all levels certainly as competent as Arnold Schwarzenegger or Cruz Bustamante, neither of whom regularly are pilloried by the press.

I don’t have a clear sense of how the leading candidates would govern or what their aptitude is, but I do know that Huffington is among the brightest, most enlightened and most competent people I’ve known. I trust her abilities to propose and implement progressive policy solutions that might involve compromise but would also shake up the status quo.

Which brings up the S-word: sexism. If Huffington were a man, the fact that she is unarguably charming, rich, good looking, flamboyant and ambitious (or, lacking in humility) would engender admiration not animosity. Men who are opportunist-a given among powerful leaders-are seen as go-getters and initiators. An ambitious woman is suspect. The first negative story that broke-that she paid no state taxes and only $771 in federal taxes-glossed over the fact that she paid nearly $150,000 in property and employee payroll taxes and donated a quarter of her income to charity.

As for the endless accusations of her re-invention: California is the mother of re-invention, that is redefining who you are and who you want to be. She was conservative, now she’s a progressive liberal. Huffington is hardly alone in growing increasingly aware of social inequities and the government’s responsibility to act responsibly. Like most people I too have personally evolved. My priorities have shifted, as have my career and personal goals. Guess what? It’s called growth-unless you want to spin it as a negative.

Does she have human frailties like vanity, hubris, ego and unresolved dark areas? Yes, but so to do Schwarzenegger, Grey Davis and Bustamante and Tom McClintock. Let’s get real: Almost all leaders are part idealists and part egoists with something to prove.

So let’s give Huffington a break and judge her on the same terms as we would a man.
Cliff Rothman is founder of Media in Action, a new Los Angeles-based proactive media group, and contributing journalist to Vanity Fair and the New York Times.

More information about Cliff Rothman
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    I have nothing against Ariana being a woman. Who-specifically in the media- does? On the last debate she got far more good media attention than she deserved.

    I wouldn’t vote for because I don’t trust her. She spins her views around so much I have no idea where she stands. It has nothing to do with her sex.

    Posted by Jordan on Oct 3, 2003 at 4:34 PM

    Isn’t this the woman that rallied for Warren Beatty’s presidential run?!

    Brentwood millionaires supporting Brentwood millionaires- There’s a winning recipe for the downtrodden, the uninsured, and the average american!

    Posted by Ty on Oct 3, 2003 at 4:41 PM

    Arianna’s and independent and critical thinker who cares about social issues having to do with the disenfranchized who has the courage to use whatever celebrity she has toward championing those causes.  And, in doing so gives voice to those of us with the same socially responsible inclinations.

    In totay’s political climate, her refreshing views and the promulgation of those views to a larger audience than many of we in agreement, is a public service to all.

    Posted by malcolm thoms on Oct 3, 2003 at 6:51 PM

    I admire her brains and her willingness to wake up and smell the coffee! She had every selfish reason to stay a Republican but her conscience wouldn’t allow her to. She has become an eloquent and powerful advocate of the environment and of the common people, turning on the “pigs at the trough” (Big Business) who are jgetting a free tax ride on the backs of working people. Arianna is one smart cookie. Too bad there are so many know-nothings out there who don’t recognize that she’s working for THEM. 

    Posted by Sinead Westlough on Oct 3, 2003 at 7:03 PM

    I cannot overstate the preponderence of stupidity, ignorance and gullibility of the electorate.  Especially in this ever-darkening age of a bald-faced lying and plundering, murderous and vindictive leadership which spreads like a nuclear winter over the general global spirit of the times.  If another dim-witted actor, (who appeals to the most adolescent yearnings of those who can’t distinguish between the crapulous content of fantasy-action cinema and the reality of the deteriorating world around them), becomes a real-life actor a.k.a. politician...gets elected who is to blame?  The press, the money, the influence, the glamor are no excuses for those who feel they need to vote for a vacuous Nazi lover rather than a woman whose grasp of the issues and superior intelligence would have probably endowed them with a creative and innovative problem-solving, attentive, and responsive stateswoman...then California deservers the fate that’s in store for them, God help us all.  It’s not that the electorate has merely become a sound-bite knee-jerk irresponsible horde of idiots but that they consciously choose to be thus and believe they’re just incredibly clever for being that way.  We are our own worst enemy.  Every won election of the worst element that runs for office only concretizes the manipulators’ justified evaluation of our superficial proclivities and adds fuel to their argument that democracy is but a euphemism for misrule by popular default. 

    Posted by Dom Mastroserio on Oct 3, 2003 at 9:48 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 25 posts.