Culture > May 9, 2003

Strange Weather Lately

By Kurt Vonnegut

The following is adapted from a Clemens Lecture presented in April for the Mark Twain House in Hartford, Connecticut.

———————

First things first: I want it clearly understood that this mustache I’m wearing is my father’s mustache. I should have brought his photograph. My big brother Bernie, now dead, a physical chemist who discovered that silver iodide can sometimes make it snow or rain, he wore it, too.

Speaking of weather: Mark Twain said some readers complained that there wasn’t enough weather in his stories. So he wrote some weather, which they could insert wherever they thought it would help some.

Mark Twain was said to have shed a tear of gratitude and incredulousness when honored for his writing by Oxford University in England. And I should shed a tear, surely, having been asked at the age of 80, and because of what I myself have written, to speak under the auspices of the sacred Mark Twain House here in Hartford.

What other American landmark is as sacred to me as the Mark Twain House? The Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. Mark Twain and Abraham Lincoln were country boys from Middle America, and both of them made the American people laugh at themselves and appreciate really important, really moral jokes.

I note that construction has stopped of a Mark Twain Museum here in Hartford —behind the carriage house of the Mark Twain House at 351 Farmington Avenue.

Work persons have been sent home from that site because American “conservatives,” as they call themselves, on Wall Street and at the head of so many of our corporations, have stolen a major fraction of our private savings, have ruined investors and employees by means of fraud and outright piracy.

Shock and awe.

And now, having installed themselves as our federal government, or taken control of it from outside, they have squandered our public treasury and then some. They have created a public debt of such appalling magnitude that our descendants, for whom we had such high hopes, will come into this world as poor as church mice.

Shock and awe.

What are the conservatives doing with all the money and power that used to belong to all of us? They are telling us to be absolutely terrified, and to run around in circles like chickens with their heads cut off. But they will save us. They are making us take off our shoes at airports. Can anybody here think of a more hilarious practical joke than that one?

Smile, America. You’re on Candid Camera.

And they have turned loose a myriad of our high-tech weapons, each one costing more than a hundred high schools, on a Third World country, in order to shock and awe human beings like us, like Adam and Eve, between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers.

The other day I asked former Yankees pitcher Jim Bouton what he thought of our great victory over Iraq, and he said, “Mohammed Ali versus Mr. Rogers.”

What are conservatives? They are people who will move heaven and earth, if they have to, who will ruin a company or a country or a planet, to prove to us and to themselves that they are superior to everybody else, except for their pals. They take good care of their pals, keep them out of jail—and so on.

Conservatives are crazy as bedbugs. They are bullies.

Shock and awe.

Class war? You bet.

They have proved their superiority to admirers of Abraham Lincoln and Mark Twain and Jesus of Nazareth, with an able assist from television, making inconsequential our protests against their war.

What has happened to us? We have suffered a technological calamity. Television is now our form of government.

On what grounds did we protest their war? I could name many, but I need name only one, which is common sense.

Be that as it may, construction of the Mark Twain Museum will sooner or later be resumed. And I, the son and grandson of Indiana architects, seize this opportunity to suggest a feature which I hope will be included in the completed structure, words to be chiseled into the capstone over the main entrance.

Here is what I think would be fun to put up there, and Mark Twain loved fun more than anything. I have tinkered with something famous he said, which is: “Be good and you will be lonesome.” That is from Following the Equator. OK?

So envision what a majestic front entrance the Mark Twain Museum will have someday. And imagine that these words have been chiseled into the noble capstone and painted gold:

be good and you will be lonesome most places, but not here, not here.

One of the most humiliated and heartbroken pieces Twain ever wrote was about the slaughter of 600 Moro men, women and children by our soldiers during our liberation of the people of the Philippines after the Spanish-American War. Our brave commander was Leonard Wood, who now has a fort named after him. Fort Leonard Wood.

What did Abraham Lincoln have to say about such American imperialist wars? Those are wars which, on one noble pretext or another, actually aim to increase the natural resources and pools of tame labor available to the richest Americans who have the best political connections.

And it is almost always a mistake to mention Abraham Lincoln in a speech about something or somebody else. He always steals the show. I am about to quote him.

Lincoln was only a Congressman when he said in 1848 what I am about to echo. He was heartbroken and humiliated by our war on Mexico, which had never attacked us.

We were making California our own, and a lot of other people and properties, and doing it as though butchering Mexican soldiers who were only defending their homeland against invaders wasn’t murder.

What other stuff besides California? Well, Texas, New Mexico, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming.

The person congressman Lincoln had in mind when he said what he said was James Polk, our president at the time. Abraham Lincoln said of Polk, his president, our armed forces’ commander-in-chief: “Trusting to escape scrutiny by fixing the public gaze upon the exceeding brightness of military glory, that attractive rainbow that rises in showers of blood —that serpent’s eye, that charms to destroy, he plunged into war.”

Holy smokes! I almost said, “Holy shit!” And I thought I was a writer!

Do you know we actually captured Mexico City during the Mexican War? Why isn’t that a national holiday? And why isn’t the face of James Polk up on Mount Rushmore, along with Ronald Reagan’s?

What made Mexico so evil back in the 1840s, well before our Civil War, is that slavery was illegal there. Remember the Alamo?

My great-grandfather’s name was Clemens Vonnegut. Small world, small world. This piquant coincidence is not a fabrication. Clemens Vonnegut called himself a “freethinker,” an antique word for humanist. He was a hardware merchant in Indianapolis.

So, 120 years ago, say, there was one man who was both Clemens and Vonnegut. I would have liked being such a person a lot. I only wish I could have been such a person tonight.

I claim no blood relationship with Samuel Clemens of Hannibal, Missouri. “Clemens,” as a first name, is, I believe, like the name “Clementine,” derived from the adjective “clement.” To be clement is to be lenient and compassionate, or, in the case of weather, perfectly heavenly.

So there’s weather again.

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  “Cat’s Cradle”, “Slaughterhouse 5”, I used to read some of your confabulations, Mr. Vonnegut and probably would’ve read them all if I hadn’t gotten so disgusted with contemporary literature that I had to finally commit to re-reading all of Tolstoy’s, Dostoyevski’s and Henry Miller’s work with a smattering of Whitman, Emerson, Thoreau, and yes, Twain, over and over again until one day I picked up a contemporary work by Carlos Castaneda who, along with the aforementioned, I came to include in my list of, “read overs”.  I apologize but you have to understand, I didn’t have the internet yet and was busy writing my own garbage and trying to create oil paintings.  But who cares about me?  How are you, aside from being caustically humorous as usual?  Eighty is a fine age, I’ll bet. Personally, I thought life would suck at fifty but here I am at 54, a physical wreck but still wonderin’ as I wander.  You are absolutely, (what a ridiculous adverb, no?), correct in attempting to use your gift of surreptitious humor in perhaps helping to awaken the vast majority of folks in this land of the free that they’ve forgotten to also be the home of the brave.  You opened my eyes to the necessity of having to be continually vigilant about personal convictions.  Or as Nietzche may have said, “It is not the courage of our convictions but the courage to change them”.  You reinforced that quality in me and I’ve been paying for my curiosity and what those I meet claim are contrary, iconoclastic behavioral conceits.  Well, I’m happier having said what I really think and feel and intuit and the devil take the hindmost.  Thank you again.  Hope this made some sense.

  Posted by Dom Mastroserio on May 9, 2003 at 8:13 PM

  Thanks for being so insulting. Perhaps that is why I visit this site, to remind myself how compassionate, understanding, and inclusive you lefties are. There, I’ve categorized you in my mind just as you have grouped me in with supposed evil doers. Thanks for darkening my day with your venom.

  Posted by Jon on May 10, 2003 at 9:27 AM

  Jon, another self-styled conservative who really doesn’t understand the meaning of the ideological construal of that socio-political appellation.  He probably thinks this administration and Rush Limbaugh are Conservatives.  What he really wants us to know is that he is on the side that’s got the upper hand at the moment.  A true Conservative, at the very least, has the decency to allow for the possibility that his adversary may have some useful, true, and perhaps parallel ideas on any given issue.  A true Conservative is as horrified by the corruption in government and the corporate world as he is about crime on the streets.  And that’s where Jon, the gang in the White House, and those robber barons who put them there cut themselves off from true Conservatives.  For the traditional Conservative does not wish to find that crime has been removed from the streets, it’s least harmful arena, and into the halls of government and corporations where it’s most deadly and egregious manifestations; where it’s most deleterious effects and repercussions will ineluctably, and consequently bring the entire edifice of a just and free Democratic and Republican society to dismal ruin.  Sorry about this, Mr. Vonnegut.  It seems that wherever I posit some belief of mine or aver a heartfelt conviction, some negative, clueless dunderhead seems to follow my commentary with inanities.

  Posted by Dom Mastroserio on May 10, 2003 at 8:17 PM

  Dear Kurt,
  I was hoping to read some investigative reporting on the recent proliferation of chem-trails which seem to be changing our weather and God knows what else in the air we are breathing.  I know you are trying to ease the situation with your continued light humor, but couldn’t you please put someone on this questionable purpose in our skies to find out the reason for this continued sky program?  1.  Are we to be poisoned by the current regime?  2.  Is this just an experiment to see if our babies will be born without eyeballs like the children in Iraq since the 1st Gulf war and the continued use of DU?  3.  Is this simply a ploy by the military to see if there is a cheaper way to eliminate the population?  4.  Am I getting paranoid?  5.  Are you in denial?

  Posted by Emily Chadwick on May 11, 2003 at 8:45 AM

  rock on vonnegut. you make too much sense to ever disagree with. keep up the good work.

  Posted by timmy tucker on May 11, 2003 at 3:49 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 225 posts.

Member Login

Username

Password

Forgot password?

Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington