Culture » January 13, 2006

Postcards From the Front (cont’d)

Unhappy things happen when soldiers can’t peg an Iraqi as “good” or “evil.” The narrators struggle to read facial expressions and body language in tense situations, where someone can “look” angry one minute and welcoming the next. Any behavior less than unmistakably benign—loud offers of food or broad smiles—has the potential to be misinterpreted as threatening.

Even Kayla Williams (Love My Rifle More Than You: Young and Female in the U.S. Army), an Arab linguist who communicates military directives to the locals, fails to transcend stereotypes. Williams, a former sergeant in the 101st Airborne, credits her two-year relationship with an Arab ex-boyfriend for giving her “sympathy, understanding and respect for the people of Iraq.” And she is more sensitive than an 18-year-old American kid who doesn’t understand the Iraqi tendency to come up close and speak loudly. Yet the bulk of her translations are directed at the Iraqis, not for them. When Iraqis express anger and frustration, she offers platitudes—or in one case, a bag of Skittles—and walks away. More unforgivably, in at least one instance, Williams doesn’t bother to refute a colonel’s mistaken assumption that a group of seriously injured Iraqis—a.k.a. “ragheads”—were trying to kill his men.

But Love My Rifle is more about Williams—her battles with low self-esteem and sexual harassment, fraught relationships with incompetent female superior officers and male soldiers—than the war itself. For Williams and her fellow memoirists, this war isn’t about oil, terrorism, democracy or kicking ass for the U.S. of A. It’s about them—their self-image, their needs, their emotions. This is war in the “Real World,” not the real world, where the fate of nations and people hang in the balance.

A broader perspective

The one writer who defies this navel-gazing is Nathaniel Fick (One Bullet Away: The Making of a Marine Officer), who joined the Marine Corps to serve his country: “[I]t was a last bastion of honor in society, a place where young Americans learned to work as a team, to trust one another and themselves, and to sacrifice for a principle.”

Fick is all that we would want our soldiers to be: decent, thoughtful, responsible and brave. Unlike Buzzell, who picks the infantry because his “heart was dead set on pulling a trigger,” he opts for the First Recon Battalion whose primary goal is to gather information, not “spray and pray.” It’s a special kind of Marine who returns from a triumphant tour of duty in Afghanistan only to be disappointed by jingoism at home: “Flag waving, tough talk, a yellow ribbon on every bumper. I didn’t see any interest in understanding the war on the ground. No one acknowledged that the fight would be long and dirty, and that maybe the enemy had courage and ideals, too.”

Unlike his fellow memoirists, Fick cares deeply about military strategy and winning the war. Though he is no antiwar activist, he has been vocal in his criticism of Bush’s Iraq policy in his various media appearances. One Bullet Away documents the incompetence of his commanding officer, the lack of post-invasion planning and lopsided military priorities that forced him “to accept senior officers’ decisions, regardless of their stupidity, criminality, or inhumanity.”

One such criminal decision occurs when everyone inside an airport field is declared hostile. Fick’s men end up shooting two teenage boys. Describing his fight to ensure the boys get proper medical attention, Fick makes clear the real reasons for his altruism: Dead kids are bad for morale.

Fighting (this war), for me, meant two things: winning and getting my men home alive. Alive, though, set the bar too low. I had to get them physically and psychologically intact. They had to know that, whether or not they supported the larger war, they had fought their little piece of it with honor and had retained their humanity.

Those two goals—winning and taking care of his men—may have been compatible when the victory was defined as the ouster of Saddam Hussein. Today the mission is nothing less than bringing peace and democracy to Iraq. Within this context, the death of an Iraqi boy represents a decisive defeat, irrespective of its toll on our soldiers. The low priority that military policy has assigned to Iraqi life throughout this war is exactly what fuels the insurgency.

Since publication, Fick has suggested a shift in military strategy, advocating for “green zones” in Iraq where the people’s “security and comfort are our first priority.” But there are few signs, judging by these memoirs, that our soldiers have the training to take on such an unprecedented task—a task complicated by their inability to distinguish between friend and foe in a war whose frontlines run through the streets, backyards and bedrooms of ordinary Iraqis.

At war with ourselves?

Nearly three years into this conflict, the only military objective Americans can agree on is the welfare of our troops. Since Vietnam, the prime directive of American war-making has been protecting “our sons and daughters in the military.” This is why Bush speaks almost exclusively at military bases and veteran gatherings. It is also why the antiwar movement as of late speaks less of the war’s spurious rationales than of its effects on the soldiers. Morale, body armor, casualty numbers—these are the new buzzwords of post-invasion activism, whose most recognizable face is Cindy Sheehan, the mother of a dead soldier. The Iraqis have become an afterthought.

In Jarhead, during an argument with a German tourist, Swofford stumbles upon the fatal flaw in all national narratives of war:

[T]he problem with believing your country’s battle monuments and deaths are more important than those of other nations is that the enemy disappears … the heroes from one’s own country are no longer believed to have fought against a national enemy but simply with other heroes …

In our stories of this war—including these memoirs—it is the Iraqi people who have disappeared, rendered invisible in a war fought ostensibly on their behalf. Who will speak their truth of this war? More importantly, who will listen?

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 40% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Not bad Lakshmi

  As for the “Heroes” who are invading a sovereign nation on orders from the sock puppet Bush on behalf of the Globalists…............. glad to see a few could get a book deal out of it.

  Sure though it’s lucky that the Iraqis are sub human and their feelings, freedom and honor are not as important as the American Cannon Fodder who happened to survive the actual assault and occupation.

  Imagine how the stories of the Iraqis would sound in few years if they ever get to write their stories?

  Posted by Rabbit on Jan 13, 2006 at 5:52 PM

  We are guaranteeing ourselves a major ass-kicking somewhere down the road. Count on it. We have righteously pissed off one billion Muslims, people known for their long memory and ability to patiently wait decades for vengeance.

  These yahoos the yellow ribbon magnets idolize and glorify, who through their ignorance, crudeness and sadism are representing the rest of us to an increasingly nauseated world, will make certain America’s fall.

  We will deserve it if for no other reasons than our apathy and silence.

  Posted by opeluboy on Jan 13, 2006 at 11:17 PM

  Hey opeluboy,

  What are you talking about?  You are saying we pissed off the Muslims .....  what !!

  You might want to do a little research .... I think you will find that Muslims have attacked American interest about 17 times since the mid-70’s.  They were already pissed off, they have always hated America ... this is nothing new.  Maybe if the USA and Europe would of stood up to these stupid bastards years ago, then we wouldn’t be in this situation.

  You are a perfect example of a “liberal” ... bow down to the Muslims, and then blame us ... it’s our fault. 

  Having said that, you have the right to think and say what you want ... and I hope you and other liberals keep talking.  Why ??  Because the more you liberals keep talking the more it helps the GOP win elections.  Thank You !! 

  PS - Make sure you get Michael Moore and the Hollywood Left involved in the next election .... that worked out well for the Dems in 04’ ... lol ... lmao ....

  Posted by tina1 on Jan 14, 2006 at 3:06 AM

  Amazing one can actually type such a response after walking on one’s knuckles all day.

  There is some truth here, however. I would not be surprised to see the Republicans win more elections. But first they’ll need to change the laws so they can run from prison.

  They will probably want to re-think that gay marriage ban as well since so many of them will be “brides”, willing or not (a small number, I suspect)

  Anyway, thanks for the input Tina. Or should I say Bob? Seeing how you’re a freeper it is more than likely you are in actuality a man posing as a woman (hey, whatever gets you poor repressed Neandethals off). But here’s a word of warning: stay out of the teen chat rooms. There’s too many of you conservative Christians being busted for pedophilia already.

  Posted by opeluboy on Jan 14, 2006 at 3:26 AM

  So, they let you out again, did they, tina1?

  Guards!!!

  Posted by wileywitch on Jan 14, 2006 at 3:50 AM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 143 posts.

Also featured Snap, Crackle Patents
Cult of Character
To Leave or Not to Leave

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Lakshmi Chaudhry

• The Godless Fundamentalist
  In The Root of All Evil, biologist Richard Dawkins reveals his own lust for certainty Posted on December 8, 2006
• The Power of Mean
  Fuller argues that the moral power of Rankism = that everyone experiences being a somebody and a nobody - can overcome the innate force of bullying?Posted on November 29, 2006
• Why Pakistan Gets A Nuclear Pass
  The Bush administration's pragmatic policy toward Pakistan suggests its foreign policy is less ideological than imperialPosted on September 22, 2006
• The True Temptations of the West
  Temptations of the West: How to be Modern in India, Pakistan, Tibet and Beyond is a travelogue by Pankaj Mishra about the shadow of poverty in South Asia.Posted on August 24, 2006
• Why Hemingway Is Chick-Lit
  Women read more fiction than men.Posted on August 16, 2006