In These Times is not immune to the Great Recession. Please donate now!
PrintDiscuss
Features » April 19, 2006

Hotel Workers Rising Tide (cont’d)

Page 2 of 2« Previous

Actor Danny Glover speaks at a UNTE HERE rally on February 16, in Los Angeles.

Tags   

Unions can still shift the distribution of power and wealth. A housekeeper in San Francisco, where about 90 percent of hotel workers are unionized, makes $15 an hour, compared with Boston and Chicago, where 50 to 60 percent are in unions and the average wage is $12 to $13 an hour, or Atlanta or Phoenix, where very few are unionized and wages are $8 to $9 an hour. The room rates are similar at every Hilton or Sheraton. The difference lies in the degree of unionization.

“The greatest anti-poverty program in American history is the organized labor movement,” Edwards told the cheering hotel workers in Chicago, significantly revising the venerable Democratic applause line that the best anti-poverty program is a job. An unofficial presidential aspirant, Edwards called for “real labor law reform,” swift and severe punishment of labor law violators and neutrality on the part of employers so workers can “decide without interference” on whether to join a union.

That’s where the second part of Hotel Workers Rising enters. In the past five years, UNITE HERE has organized more than 12,000 new workers, mostly in full-service, big city hotels, where the union is strongest. But even once a majority of workers had signed membership cards, it still took hard fights to pressure hotel managers to recognize the union. Yet in an industry with 1.4 million workers, where less than 10 percent of all hotel and motel workers are unionized, UNITE HERE wants to organize faster and on a much greater scale.

Union strategists have long indicated that this year they would like to win national agreements from hotel chains to remain neutral and simply check union cards for recognition. The hotel industry has geared up to fight for elections as more democratic than card check.

UNITE HERE has persuaded hotel operators to be neutral in a variety of ways. In both San Francisco and Boston, for example, hotels have agreed to neutrality in certain new developments or after acquisition of properties, and in many cities, UNITE HERE has managed to make neutrality a condition for operators of hotels built as part of publicly subsidized projects.

Wilhelm now says, “We’re not especially concerned about the details of the process, but we do strongly believe that workers should not be subjected to harassment and intimidation if they want to join a union.”

In a presentation to a group of Wall Street analysts, Wilhelm emphasized that the union wanted above all to establish a cooperative relationship with the Hiltons and Starwoods of the industry, but their top executives wouldn’t even meet with him. “There is more money to be saved on cooperative undertakings in health care, worker compensation and training than to be won by either side in adversarial collective bargaining,” he argued.

He also told analysts that a cooperative relationship was necessary to deliver the customer service that the luxury hotels see as essential for winning upscale business and leisure customers. “The hotel industry, led by Starwood, has changed from an industry selling beds and meals to one selling an emotional experience,” Wilhelm said. “It can’t deliver or extract the charges it wants without involving workers. A luxury lifestyle can’t be delivered by people in poverty.”

But many of the hotel giants show little interest in cooperation, especially Hilton. “We have to be particularly persuasive or find other ways to make them recognize it’s the smart thing to do,” says Chicago local union president Henry Tamarin. “We say we want to be partners, but that doesn’t mean they’ll leap into our arms. Negotiations are not won by rationality of arguments. This has to do with the balance of power.”

This year, the union’s efforts to link union and non-union workers could help tip the balance in its favor. In Los Angeles, organizing campaigns at five major hotels, including two Hiltons, have gone public. Seventy to 90 percent of workers in these hotels have signed petitions calling for a new strategy for the industry, including a fair process for union recognition. The union has mobilized community and political supporters, who see better pay for hotel workers as crucial for both economic development and social justice. And it has enlisted union workers fighting for a new contract in the work of organizing new workers. The drive is drawing high-profile supporters; at the February launch of the Hotel Workers Rising campaign in Los Angeles, Wihelm, actor Danny Glover and Los Angeles city attorney Rocky Delgadillo walked through the LAX Hilton, talking with employees and then rallying in the cafeteria.

But, fundamentally, “the link is between workers,” says Los Angeles organizing director Kurt Petersen. “Housekeepers in one Hilton property clean three more rooms than another; one has health insurance, and the other doesn’t. The link becomes clearer when they talk one-on-one. There’s this consciousness that as one Hilton worker does better, we all do better.”

As the contract fight progresses, other organizing drives will go public, boosting both the contract fights and organizing drives. “This strengthens our union’s commitment to turn this into a movement,” says San Francisco union president Mike Casey. “Unless the industry understands … we’re becoming a movement of hotel workers across North America, we’re not going to be able to deliver improvements for our members and workers outside the union.”

Although key items like wages, benefits and work rules will be negotiated locally, the union hopes to engage top corporate executives in discussions about crucial policies. For example, Wilhelm wants hotels not to dismiss immigrant workers while the workers are trying to resolve immigration issues. At the same time, UNITE HERE is backing the Kennedy-McCain immigration reform bill that is also supported by the hotel industry. But UNITE HERE also wants the hotel industry to commit to hiring more African-American workers, so they can take advantage of worker gains in the industry. Other national topics could include union rights beyond employer neutrality in organizing, such as the right to honor picket lines or to play a role in selecting uniform and laundry companies (which could help UNITE HERE in its drive to organize industrial laundries, especially the giant Cintas).

——————————-

Ultimately the union’s campaign will only reach full potential if it becomes a broader movement that challenges the growing inequality in American society. Such a movement must give force to the widely shared sense that everyone who works is entitled to a life that reflects the wealth of this country—a comfortable home, universal health care, high quality public education from child care through college, secure retirement and, most important, a “living wage.” Although the union campaign’s top priority is uniting all hotel workers, Casey argues, it “should extend well beyond our sector of the economy.”

Hotel Workers Rising feeds into local movements for a living wage and state campaigns for a higher minimum wage, including initiatives in at least six states this election year. With the support from the mayors of San Francisco and Los Angeles and presidential hopeful Edwards, UNITE HERE hopes to push economic inequality more toward the center stage of American politics, making economics a moral issue, not just a technical matter to be sorted out by the marketplace.

The hotel worker campaign faces some formidable obstacles. Take wages: Unions were able to raise manufacturing wages—until they were undercut by globalization—partly because manufacturers could invest in new technology to boost productivity. But in the services sector, there are fewer opportunities for increasing productivity. As a result, service unions will need to rely less on contracts with employers to create the middle class American dream for their workers and more on the creation of universal social programs, like national health insurance and strengthened public pensions. And those new programs will have to be financed with taxes that explicitly redistribute more equitably the growth of the American economy without regard to a specific job or employer. But for this to succeed in the era of globalization, all of organized labor will have to head in that direction.

Emmanuel Asare, a 39-year old immigrant from Ghana who works two full-time hotel jobs to support his family, understands the concept of broader solidarity very well. “It’s very important for me to organize more hotel workers so we can come together as a big union, a united union, so we can stand up,” says Asare, a Chicago union member. “Without that, the companies don’t offer anything.”

Page 2 of 2« Previous
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 40% off the newsstand price!
David Moberg, a senior editor of In These Times, has been on the staff of the magazine since it began publishing. Before joining In These Times, he completed his work for a Ph.D. in anthropology at the University of Chicago and worked for Newsweek. Recently he has received fellowships from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Nation Institute for research on the new global economy.

More information about David Moberg
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    I am sympathetic to the cause.

    That said, i doubt that workers like maids are ever going to make a living wage. They simply are not that valuable. They have minimal skills. $12/hour seems more than fair to me.

    We gave unskilled auto workers ridiculously large salaries and handsome benefits, due to their unionization. They make far more than can be justified. GM may go bankrupt as a consequence.

    If you kill the golden goose, you get no gold. Workers in these fields need to make sure their demands are reasonable. . .

    (Now if there were only some way to stop the massive giveaways to CEOs, all would be fine.)

    Posted by wolf on Apr 19, 2006 at 4:49 PM

    GM is going bankrupt for more reasons than it’s worker compensation package - Ford has a similar problem, but already they’ve slowed their downward spiral by tightening up their overall operations, and not just slashing employee pay.  The real problem has been that for years GM has been trying to sucker people into a 3-year buying cycle, while asian automotive companies build cars that last a great deal longer if properly cared for.  With rising interest rates and growing loan terms, people are buying more long-term now, and GM’s sales are floundering, while Toyota, Nissan, and Honda are doing just fine.  Toyota, in fact, is enjoying record-setting sales.

    Hell, I used to sell Chevrolets, I know how desperate they are to keep up with foreign automotives.

    $12/hour is the post-union average, so of course it’s more reasonable.  According to the article, “the average hotel housekeeper in the United States makes $7.85 an hour,” which is abysmally low.  Often, the heads of these companies make in a year what an entire housekeeping staff will make in their collected lifetimes, so why not look at CEO compensation packages as the first to be cut if a reasonable pay-raise is such a burden? 

    Consider COSTCO, whos CEO has declined a raise in pay and his yearly bonuses for several years, insisting instead that the money be used to better employee pay and benefits.  As a result, it’s common to find people in their late teens or early twenties making $12-15 an hour as COSTCO employees.  They also have minimal skills, work half as hard as your run-of-the-mill housekeeper, and despite their pay rates their company is more than fiscally healthy.

    Posted by Harrower on Apr 20, 2006 at 10:59 AM

    UNITE/HERE is a vital part of the labor movement. They deserve our suport.

    Posted by cabdriverinchicago on Apr 20, 2006 at 4:55 PM

    Why should someone with “more skill” get paid more? Does that extra knowledge somehow make a person more valuable? I say we pay everyone the same and let people work where they want to. Obviously though, we can’t do that, then there would be no way to convince people that the they should spend half their lives doing something they don’t want to do. How many useless and harmful industries would dry up and disappear if people didn’t have to work there in order for their children to eat? It’s called wage-slavery, and it’s the “freedom” we live under.  Hasta la victoria siempre!

    Posted by Phaedrus on Apr 21, 2006 at 1:49 AM

    Even better, lets eliminate money altogether. We could all just get along and share. From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. (Also see Imagine, by Lennon.)

    Next maybe we could learn to levitate and communicate via telepathy. . .

    Time for me to return back to the real world.

    Posted by wolf on Apr 21, 2006 at 2:07 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 16 posts.

Appeared in the April 2006 Issue
Also by David Moberg
  • Solidarity Reunited?
    Unions rally around shrunken UNITE HERE as it takes on its former ally.Posted on July 4, 2009
  • Can a Union Divided Stand?
    UNITE HERE dissolves in conflict ... with a little help from SEIU.Posted on July 1, 2009
  • Battling Over Employee Free Choice
    The fate of labor’s top legislative priority is in the Senate’s hands.Posted on May 28, 2009
  • Flower Power
    Colombian plantation workers are fighting an uphill battle to unionize and secure better working conditions.Posted on May 3, 2009
  • The Meltdown Goes Global
    It is time to rethink capitalism. Posted on April 15, 2009
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS