Features » November 12, 2008

The Selma of Immigration Rights (cont’d)

Many locals fear the sweeps might be test case for Operation Endgame, a 2003 ICE directive to ‘remove all removable aliens’ from the United States by 2012.

Anti-immigrant laws

Anti-immigrant fervor in Arizona began in earnest in the wake of 9/11, and increased over the next few years. In 2004, Arizona voters approved Proposition 200, a citizen’s initiative that mandated people to show proof of citizenship at the polls on Election Day.

“That opened the floodgates to more anti-immigrant rhetoric by legislators, because they saw the overwhelming support that it had by voters,” says Guzman. “So by the 2006 election, all of the candidates [who] were running … had something to say about immigration because it was a popular thing.”

That same election also saw a flurry of ballot initiatives targeting the Spanish-speaking population:

• An amendment to the state constitution making English the official state language. (In 2000, voters had already made English the only language that could be taught in Arizona public schools.)

• A law that denied awarding punitive damages in civil court cases to persons who are in the United States illegally.

• Another law that denied bail to undocumented immigrants who are charged with serious felonies.

• And last but not least, Proposition 300, which denied all “state and local benefits” to those who could not provide proof of citizenship, including college scholarships and financial aid.

State Rep. Kyrsten Sinema has been battling the anti-immigrant forces since she was elected in 2004.

“Many members of the legislature are placed in a very precarious position,” Sinema says. “They personally don’t agree with these pieces of legislation, but are facing a lot of intense pressure from fringe elements of their political party.”

She estimates that about 25 percent of the people who enter the United States illegally live in Arizona. Compounded with a tough economy, she understand why that makes people upset. But Sinema, like Mayor Gordon, says the solution lies with the feds.

“If the federal government refuses to act … what you’re seeing in Arizona will get worse,” Sinema says, “and you’ll see other states begin to take this kind of misguided and inappropriate action.”

Bankrupting Maricopa County

Arpaio rejects all charges of racial profiling or scare tactics.

“The only people that should be fearing to go out are those that have violated the law … and that includes illegal immigrants,” he says.

While prisons and chain gangs made Arpaio famous, so far no evidence exists that the measures have prevented crime. In fact, a 1998 study by Arizona State University Criminal Justice professor Marie L. Griffin — and commissioned by Arpaio himself — found no difference in the recidivism rate or the attitude of inmates who served time after Arpaio’s new prison policies were implemented. Crime rates haven’t decreased, and the prison population itself has continued to grow in correlation with the national average.

Meanwhile, the financial impact of Arpaio’s policies has begun to draw fire, as well. A December 2007 investigation by the Phoenix New Times, a weekly paper, found that from 2004 until 2007, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has more than 50 times as many lawsuits filed against it than sheriffs’ agencies in Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles and New York combined.

Losses in court, legal fees and out-of-court settlements (mostly for the mistreatment or neglect of prisoners) have cost county taxpayers more than $41 million since Arpaio took office in 1993. What’s more, the deductible for the county’s insurance policy that covers lawsuits against the sheriff has risen from $1 million to $5 million over the past decade.

At the same time, the number of undocumented immigrants in Arizona may be dwindling.

“They’re leaving,” says Bernasconi, who had trouble finding subcontractors to finish building his daughter’s house in Guadalupe earlier this year. “They don’t have the people for laying the tile, putting in the carpets, putting in the cabinets. … They are going to other states or they are returning to Mexico.”

Annie Loyd, an independent candidate for a local congressional seat, points out that Arpaio’s sweeps are the second recent hit to local business. The first came in January, when a new state law came into effect, fining employers for hiring undocumented workers, and eventually shutting down those businesses.

“Our employer sanctions law created an un-level playing field for us as a state in comparison to other states,” Loyd says. “Immigration is a federal issue and needs to be resolved at a federal level … because it is supposed to be applied equally, across-the-board, throughout the country.”

In the end, it may be the business community that determines if the Maricopa crackdown will continue unabated.

“I consider myself a conservative voter,” says Bob Sitesburg, the owner of Golden Sky Construction in Phoenix. But he says laborers have become increasingly hard to find, and adds that the immigration issue could affect his vote in November. “I’m in an industry where we need those workers,” Sitesburg says.

In January, Arizona became the first state to legally require employers to use E-verify, a Homeland Security system that verifies new employees legal status. President Bush followed suit in June, signing an executive order that mandates all government agencies to use E-verify.

But the system is widely criticized by government officials and business owners, for its 4.1 percent error rates, and for the fact that participating in E-verify doesn’t protect a business that is caught employing illegal immigrants, even if those workers were cleared by the system. It’s just the latest burden for Arizona businesses, which have put a proposition on the November ballot that would loosen the new employer sanctions law.

Local businesses in Phoenix have become increasingly concerned, as well. People moving away or hiding at home means fewer customers, and the bad press associated with nativist groups squaring off against immigrants in the streets doesn’t help the local chamber of commerce attract new business to the area.

Nathan Newman, policy director for the Progressive States Network, who authored a September report titled “The Anti-Immigrant Movement That Failed,” says workplace sanctions, in particular, have raised bipartisan opposition.

“It’s probably the only [issue] I could see,” he says, “where you end up with the chamber of commerce, the head of labor unions, religious groups and human rights groups, all so unanimous in saying ‘This is the wrong approach.’ “

Newman’s study found that the majority of states haven’t jumped on the anti-immigrant bandwagon. And because of business concerns, he doesn’t believe they will.

“It’s not like these waves of anti-immigrant legislation are new things in American history,” Newman says. “This comes in waves, and states have gone through this sort of hysteria in the past. California went through this in the early ’90s. And they looked at it and said ‘Yeah, well, we don’t think so.’ “

But Arizona is not California, and there was no Sheriff Joe in Sacramento 15 years ago. Joan Koerber Walker, CEO of the Arizona Small Business Association, compares Phoenix, the fifth largest city in the United States, to Detroit, which held that rank in the ’60s.

“Law enforcement [in Detroit], with the best intentions, went into heavily racially concentrated areas, specifically looking for felons and lawbreakers,” she says. “The community became polarized, eventually violence broke out, and the businesses in the city of Detroit, many of them never reopened and never recovered.”

She adds: “I would hate to see Phoenix go the same way.” 

[Editor’s note: A radio version of this story—on the National Radio Project’s nationally-syndicated international public affairs show “Making Contact”—can be heard here.]

• Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
• Subscribe today and save 40% off the newsstand price!

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  America is a sovereign nation that is entitled to protect its borders. The overwhelming number of Americans want our immigration laws respected and enforced. As recent as 2007 both sides of the political aisle tried to push “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” (Amnesty) on the American people. In the 70 percentile, the American people responded that they would not accept Amnesty in any form.

  Unfortunately, there seems to be a cult like movement in America, that will keep pushing America’s politicians to continue to supplant the will of the people.

  I’m sure that many of the illegal aliens in the United States are nice folks, and I’m just as sure they can continue to be nice folks in their own country. We certainly don’t need to create a legal population, that numbers in the millions, out of illegal aliens.

  We tried Amnesty in the late 80s, and that did not cure anything, because here we are again, trying for another. America simply can’t serve as the care giver, employer, educater for all of the countries that fail to take care of their own people.

  Many of those in American law enforcement come from diverse cultural backgrounds, including the Latino culture. We do not hide or feel fear while we are off duty, nor do our children. If you feel this fear, it is probably because you are illegal or you support someone that is illegal. If the illegals would simply return to their countries, perhaps they would be less fearful.

  Posted by bobbyt on Nov 12, 2008 at 2:31 PM

  Illegal aliens are criminals and parasites, one and all. Their very presence here and practically everything they do on U. S. soil is illegal. They need to be ferreted out, rounded up like cattle, punished for their numerous crimes, then booted back to whence they snuck in from with such extreme prejudice that they will never, ever think of violating our sovereignty again. Enough is enough.

  Posted by BajaRat on Nov 12, 2008 at 6:48 PM

  Andrew , This is just another poor Jaun and Maria story that we are bombarded with time and tme again . We keep reelceting OUR Sheriff BECAUSE WE WANT HIM TO ENFORCE OUR IMMIGRATION LAWS !  What is so hard to understand about that?
  First of all my family is Mexican /American and 48 % of us voted for prop 200 here in Az. . 90% of Americans as a whole want this immigration problem stopped !! The people of this country have spoken time and time and time again , but people like you will not let our will be done . First of all by your title of this article “Selma and immigration ”  is a farce , and you should know better , how dare you relate the two issues as one . YOU havve no right . Our black struggle in this country is not the same as the illegal immigration problem so DON"T try to make americans out to be stupid or like this issue of illegal immigration is about human rights , it is about illegal entry and a country going broke supporting third worlds peoples , read the research. This issue is not going away , this country is economically on its knees and bringing the entire third world is not helping things regardless of the globalist thinking they can shove this down our throats , it isn’t working in tibet , it didn’t work in Bolivia by bringing froeign workers to take jobs and it isn’t going to work here , NOW you undertand that , or there wiil be no choice but to have a revolution in this country . We love this country it is our country , not the politicians who are selling it down the drain.

  Posted by Ruth slater on Jan 28, 2009 at 11:08 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also featured An Unfolding Crisis in the Wake of Mississippi ICE Raid
Citizen Gore Vidal
On a Mission From God

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Andrew Stelzer

• A Dark Night in Iceland
  Environmentalists decry the privatization of their country's clean energy resources Posted on January 8, 2007
• Anarchist Cheerleader Elected
  Lake Worth City Commissioner Cara Jennings refocuses her radicalism after surprise winPosted on June 14, 2006
• Road to Riches or Ruin?
  Army recuitment may be down, but economic hardship keeps the troops of Halliburton at high levelsPosted on November 30, 2005
• Ready for Dialogue
  "I'm afraid that if I watch a lot of TV, I will start… morePosted on September 23, 2005
• Official Bigotry
  In Florida, both anti-gay political rhetoric and hate crimes are on the risePosted on August 30, 2005