Fresh from participating in a panel discussion at a Chicago screening of Chisolm ‘72: Unbought and Unbossed, feminist writer and organizer Amy Richards describes how she and co-author Jennifer Baumgardner arrived at the idea for their latest book. Too often, Richards explains, progressive speakers passionately outline [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Jessica Clark
-
The New Cartographers
What does it mean to map everything all the time?
MORE » -
iPower to the People
The perils and promise of point-and-click politics
MORE » -
Blogs Up, Hacks Down
The appearance of seven Democratic presidential contenders at the YearlyKos convention demonstrated that the Kossacks and fellow A-listers--along with what the Liberal Blog Advertising Network calls their 3 million daily readers--are now ensconced as political players
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
I’m right-handed, and I think this was a good essay.
Richards state ” As soon as someone is successful, he or she is often accused of being too privileged to be radical. I don’t fall prey to that critique anymore because I know from my own experience that I am using what privilege I have to expand resources to others.”
Despite this pious assertion, Richard’s activism is mediated by her current class privilege as much as her historical expereince. As the successful professional, her lifestyle objectively provides her with choices other women simply don’t have. contradiction she remains unable to resolve convincingly.
What are you saying marat, that success in this culture is taint? So change from within is not possible? If it’s only the failures that are credible as agents of change, then we’re doomed because the failures are failures and they’ll fail at change too.
Why are her convictions or abilities questioned? It is interesting that this does not come up very often concerning men, such as Howard Zinn or Noam Chomsky or other male intellectual radicals that have generated wealth thorough their writings.
I wonder how Amy’s son will feel when he realizes he narrowly missed being “reduced” by his mother’s choice.
Would you have wanted your mother to have had more children than she wanted, or could afford, or that was safe for her?
register a new account »Posting Security