The steam explosion that tore the roof from Chernobyl’s fourth unit in the pre-dawn hours of April 26, 1986, spewing fallout across much of Europe, seemed a Hollywood techno-disaster flick become chillingly real. Though the drama and terror of those spring days have faded, we are [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Fred Weir
-
People vs. Putin Power
The Russian Spring begins in winter.
MORE » -
Russia Claims the High Ground
The Kremlin condemns persecution of WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange—but it may soon change its tune
MORE » -
Orange Fades to Black
Heralded for its Orange Revolution five years ago, Ukraine is coming apart at the seams
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
Has coal killed more or less people than nuclear energy? Done more or less environmental damage? How about oil?
6 billion people using energy at the rate of the developed world is not feasible. I wonder what we will tell the developing countries? (Maybe zero point energy is the answer?)
Hi Maggie,
What do you mean:
(Maybe zero point energy is the answer?)
I’m confused.
Hi Merlin - It was a joke. ALong the lines of “nuclear energy will be so cheap as to make measuring the use of it unnecessay”.
Zero point energy is the energy the universe is immersed in (empty space is very active, it turns out). Tapping it is the stuff of SciFi.
The peaceful atom may yet be our savior in a world with a growing thirst for energy drinking from a well that appears to be in danger of going dry. Pressurized water cooled reactors, whether like the design at Chernobyl or the US design at TMI, were flawed designs that sprang from the push by the US Navy and Adm. Hyman Rickover to put reactors on submarines. But there is another way…pebble bed reactors which are, thanks to the laws of physics, immune to runaway chain reactions due to coolant loss.
See Wired’s “Let A Thousand Reactors Bloom” for the story of pebble bed reactor technology in China.
http://wired-vig.wired.com/wired/archive/12.09/china.html
register a new account »Posting Security