Many participants returned from the Millions More Movement event in Washington D.C. convinced that the October 15 rally was a useful step in community mobilization and political organizing. Some enthusiasts even mark the event, which officially commemorated the 10th anniversary of the 1995 Million Man March, [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Salim Muwakkil
-
Black and Blue Chicago
A recent spate of police shootings of African Americans underscores longstanding mutual distrust.
MORE » -
Black Chicago Divided
Class and generational conflicts intensify, as African Americans cope with the Great Recession.
MORE » -
Malcolm’s X-Factor
Why did Manning Marable’s attempt to demystify Malcolm X provoke such conflict?
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
Beginning with the first march ten years it seems that these gatherings are an attempt by leaders to stay in the news. When A.Philip Randolph threatened to march on the capitol he got results.Today despite the claim of militancy our leaders are demanding nothing. Instead of confronting problems we are being urged to look within!! As a student of freedom fighters and activists all over the world our current efforts seem to me to be worthy of a B.T. BARNUM.
Mr. Muwakkil, I agree that “De-emphasizing the event
C’mon! When did journalism equal politeness?
1. Farrakhan’s church is STILL listed as hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center and I agree with that. It ain’t because they just haven’t happened to update that list in a while. “Traces” of racism?
2. Black leadership for the most part is incredibly sexist towards black women and no white woman is going to give up hard earned rights, regard, deference to “join” that. They can’t be a part of spomething that gives them shoes smaller than the ones they are walking in now. I will stand by Black feminists to help give them the courage to stop asking for their place among black leadership, and start TAKING power. But I won’t go to Farrakhan’s stinking parties.
3. related to this, black “leadership” isn;t much leadership on several fronts, not least of which is its proclivity for openly and, in terms of my sensibilities, brutally oppressing black women.
4. The event would be more rcially inclusive if Julian Bond took over. He has at least twice all of farrakhan’s few positive traits and none of his negative ones, which are formidable. I would vote for Bond for president right now and wish he would run.
Don’t walk out here on the pages of In These Times and expect us to eat some regurgitated glace over real divisive issues that aren’t going to go away jsut because you wear Birkenstocks, or talk like you do. I don’t care what you are the editor of.
I just finished reading your bio blurb at the end of your article. You also are a fellow of Soro’s Open Society groups. Well heck, that organization’s journalism fellowships are all about sponsoring journalism that makes a real difference and if you think your polite stroll through political minefields is some substitute for indepth, objective hard hitting journalism, you are a sorry example. Luckily Soros has a ton of cash and can afford dozens, hundreds of misses. Keep looking Gerogie.
register a new account »Posting Security