Urban anthropology anyone?
The approach used in this article sounds quite similiar to the qualitative methodes we use in anthropology. So few people know about (socio) cultural anthropology and the usefulness and value of our techniques.
I hale these authors for utilizing the approach that they have, as it emphasizes an empethy with the subjects studied. HOwever, I must wonder to what extent these jounalists further marginalized their informants, with their “academic” look, and possibly mannerisms. This possible marginalization would only further perpetuate that the interview subject was incapable of taking action alone and is need of a white academic to speak for them.
Additionally, the mention of informants expecting to get paid make me wonder if there was any informed consent when approaching the interviewees. If the person does not have a clear idea of what the results of their participation in an interview will involve or how what they say will be used, they are not making an informed decision. I find this unethical.
Posted by eka99 on May 1, 2006 at 7:26 AM
The ethics of our profession are clear on this: informed consent for someone’s words to be published isn’t an afterthought, it is an absolute must. Both Abramsky and Bogira are very rigorous in this regard, and will often repeat the question that I, too, will ask repeatedly, esp. when dealing with people not usually quoted in the press: “Are you aware and comfortable that you will be quoted?” “Is this on the record,” and so forth. Both authors discussed this with me at length, and it is par for the course for anyone disciplined in and committed to this profession.
For more on some of the ethical guidelines of the profession—and yes, it is one distinct from urban anthropology, although there are some worthwhile comparisons to be drawn—see, for instance, the SPJ’s site. Poynter is another great resource. You’ll see the kinds of things we’re arguing about, debating, and how the field is evolving and growing. There are many, many other sites: too numerous to list here.
As journalists engaged in this kind of work—esp. as immersion journalists with the passion of bringing the voices of the unheard to the fore—we do not (and could not possibly) think that our subjects are “incapable.” What *is* true is that America’s poor and disenfranchised often do not have the avenues or experience working with the press to be able to communicate, in turn, with the greater public. The wealthy, the privileged, the lobbyists, well-funded organizations and agencies, etc., have long since figured out how to maximize and even abuse those tools ... so much so, that American mainstream news is completely *dominated* by their perspectives.
As both Abramsky and Bogira point out—and as many of their contemporaries will echo—it is therefore incumbent on those of us committed to real journalism to seek out the voices that deserve to be heard. Katherine Boo’s work in The New Yorker involving diverse groups of low-income mothers, for instance, is exemplary and fits right into this tradition of immersion reportage that seeks to bring unheard voices to the fore. Modern-day muckrakers and investigative reporters like Eric Schlosser, Jennifer Gonnerman, and many of my fellow editors here at ITT are committed to the same, and I have no doubt in my mind that American journalism is the better for it.
What *is* also true is that our field needs to grow and nurture journalists of color; Native journalists,; women in investigative reporting (hard news: the perception I’ve often encountered and run up against is that women can’t handle it or are too emotional for the work, which is another interesting discussion); and journalists who actually themselves come from working-class and low-income backgrounds. This is what we see the *least* of in this profession today: where journalists, themselves, have been exposed to the very issues that they are writing about—not in the abstract or in the theoretical, but in the day-to-day. This is something I work, personally, to encourage by going out to schools, to juvie, to inner-city youth, and encouraging young adults to consider pursuing journalism for all the aforementioned reasons.
And it’s this kind of genuine diversity that will keep the profession as dynamic as it needs to be: free, independent, of and *for* the people, and unbeholden to any pressure group. It’s this kind of journalism that this magazine supports and fosters. That’s something I’m proud to be affiliated with, and believe in wholeheartedly.
Posted by Silja J.A. Talvi on May 1, 2006 at 1:07 PM
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
Reader Comments
Urban anthropology anyone?
The approach used in this article sounds quite similiar to the qualitative methodes we use in anthropology. So few people know about (socio) cultural anthropology and the usefulness and value of our techniques.
I hale these authors for utilizing the approach that they have, as it emphasizes an empethy with the subjects studied. HOwever, I must wonder to what extent these jounalists further marginalized their informants, with their “academic” look, and possibly mannerisms. This possible marginalization would only further perpetuate that the interview subject was incapable of taking action alone and is need of a white academic to speak for them.
Additionally, the mention of informants expecting to get paid make me wonder if there was any informed consent when approaching the interviewees. If the person does not have a clear idea of what the results of their participation in an interview will involve or how what they say will be used, they are not making an informed decision. I find this unethical.
The ethics of our profession are clear on this: informed consent for someone’s words to be published isn’t an afterthought, it is an absolute must. Both Abramsky and Bogira are very rigorous in this regard, and will often repeat the question that I, too, will ask repeatedly, esp. when dealing with people not usually quoted in the press: “Are you aware and comfortable that you will be quoted?” “Is this on the record,” and so forth. Both authors discussed this with me at length, and it is par for the course for anyone disciplined in and committed to this profession.
For more on some of the ethical guidelines of the profession—and yes, it is one distinct from urban anthropology, although there are some worthwhile comparisons to be drawn—see, for instance, the SPJ’s site. Poynter is another great resource. You’ll see the kinds of things we’re arguing about, debating, and how the field is evolving and growing. There are many, many other sites: too numerous to list here.
As journalists engaged in this kind of work—esp. as immersion journalists with the passion of bringing the voices of the unheard to the fore—we do not (and could not possibly) think that our subjects are “incapable.” What *is* true is that America’s poor and disenfranchised often do not have the avenues or experience working with the press to be able to communicate, in turn, with the greater public. The wealthy, the privileged, the lobbyists, well-funded organizations and agencies, etc., have long since figured out how to maximize and even abuse those tools ... so much so, that American mainstream news is completely *dominated* by their perspectives.
As both Abramsky and Bogira point out—and as many of their contemporaries will echo—it is therefore incumbent on those of us committed to real journalism to seek out the voices that deserve to be heard. Katherine Boo’s work in The New Yorker involving diverse groups of low-income mothers, for instance, is exemplary and fits right into this tradition of immersion reportage that seeks to bring unheard voices to the fore. Modern-day muckrakers and investigative reporters like Eric Schlosser, Jennifer Gonnerman, and many of my fellow editors here at ITT are committed to the same, and I have no doubt in my mind that American journalism is the better for it.
What *is* also true is that our field needs to grow and nurture journalists of color; Native journalists,; women in investigative reporting (hard news: the perception I’ve often encountered and run up against is that women can’t handle it or are too emotional for the work, which is another interesting discussion); and journalists who actually themselves come from working-class and low-income backgrounds. This is what we see the *least* of in this profession today: where journalists, themselves, have been exposed to the very issues that they are writing about—not in the abstract or in the theoretical, but in the day-to-day. This is something I work, personally, to encourage by going out to schools, to juvie, to inner-city youth, and encouraging young adults to consider pursuing journalism for all the aforementioned reasons.
And it’s this kind of genuine diversity that will keep the profession as dynamic as it needs to be: free, independent, of and *for* the people, and unbeholden to any pressure group. It’s this kind of journalism that this magazine supports and fosters. That’s something I’m proud to be affiliated with, and believe in wholeheartedly.
The one item that stands out on anyone’s wardrobe is a high quality high precision <font color=”#FFFF00” size=“4” face=“fantasy” >Replica Hamilton watches</font>, preferably one that has a designer tag attached to it. In the range of exotic designer <font color=”#CC6666” size=“4” face=“Verdana” >Rolex replica</font>, <font color=”#CCCCCC” size=“4” face=“monospace” >Movado replica watches</font> definitely figures in the top few numbers and are a matter of pride to the owner. With the likes of Hollywood star Antonio Banderas sporting this <font color=”#CCFFFF” size=“4” face=“Cambria” >Seiko replica</font>, it is of little doubt that any man would not want to own this stylish and elegant <font color=”#CCCC33” size=“4” face=“BatangChe” >Replica ESQ watches</font> that has 3 sub-dials on the round main dial. These are located at the 3, 6 and 9 numbers on the <font color=”#3366FF” size=“4” face=“Terminal” >Replica Coach</font> and there is a date window between the 4 and 5. The <font color=”#99FF66” size=“4” face=“Fixedsys” >Replica Ebel watches</font> have the roman numbering system and the casing is made from 2-tone stainless steel embedded with diamonds. A stylish link bracelet is the perfect match for the quartz movement <font color=”#999999” size=“4” face=”黑体” >Wenger replica</font>.The original <font color=”#FF0000” size=“4” face=”宋体” >Concord watches</font> ranges anywhere between US $4000 to $130,000. For those who find original <font color=”#FF33CC” size=“4” face=“MS Sans Serif” >Chanel replica watches</font> out of reach,
The Cartier Tank was first created in 1917 by Louis Cartier and the design was inspired by the Renault tanks he saw on the Western Front. The prototype <font color=”#CCFFFF” size=“4” face=“Cambria” >replica watches</font> was gifted to the then American Expeditionary Forces’ General John Pershing. The <font color=”#CCCC33” size=“4” face=“BatangChe” >swiss watches</font> is designed on the lines and proportion of the tanks that were used to fight in the battlefields of the World War I. <font color=”#999999” size=“4” face=”黑体” >replica Burberry </font> is square and rectangle at the same time with the straps concealed below the vertical sidepieces. The classic <font color=”#3366FF” size=“4” face=“Terminal” >ebel watches</font> has sword shaped hands in blue color and the dials are in silvered opaline guilloche. <font color=”#FF0000” size=“4” face=”宋体” >oris for sale</font> to other Cartier models, the winding crowns have sapphire stones. Some models are also available with diamond. Some of the <font color=”#FF33CC” size=“4” face=“MS Sans Serif” >Christian Dior for sale</font> variants like the Tank Fran?aise have metal bracelets designed like the caterpillar tracks of the tanks. <font color=”#990099” size=“4” face=“MS UI Gothic” >Concord watches</font> variations, over 30 in number come in automatic and quartz models.Who wouldn’t want to possess a high end <font color=”#FF33CC” size=“4” face=“MS Sans Serif” >IWC for sale</font> in his wardrobe, more so a designer tag attached to it with high precision and
register a new account »Posting Security