The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 29 ruling in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld—that the Bush administration’s military tribunals violated federal law and the Geneva Conventions—resoundingly rejected the theories of radical executive power that the administration has used to justify a whole array of controversial governmental programs. But for now, it seems that the Bush administration remains intent on defending its actions while doing… return to article
-
subscribe to print magazine
-
email this article to a friend
-
Reader Comments (1)Page 1 of 1 pagesI miss the days where Clinton got impeached for lying about his blow job under oath….
those were the innocent, and carefree years, eh?
Posted by minerva on Aug 5, 2006 at 5:54 PM Page 1 of 1 pages -
register a new account »Posting Security
Also by Glenn Greenwald
- Rechecking the Balance of Powers
The Bush administration has finally been rebuked for its repeated efforts to evade judicial review
Popular Discussions
- The 9/11 Faith Movement
Many Americans believe 9/11 was a conspiracy by the U.S. government
1979 posts since Jul 11 06 - What’s the 411 on 9/11?
891 posts since Dec 21 05 - Democrats: It’s the War
659 posts since Nov 1 05 - Was the Presidential Election Stolen?
462 posts since Jun 19 06 - A Fundamental History Lesson
The rise of National Socialism proved politics and religion don't mix
427 posts since Oct 10 05
Site Map | Contact Us | Internships | Submissions | Advertising | Low Bandwidth / Mobile
© 2006 In These Times | Reprint Policy | Privacy Policy | Powered by Expression Engine | RSS Feeds
© 2006 In These Times | Reprint Policy | Privacy Policy | Powered by Expression Engine | RSS Feeds