Here we go again. New scientific "evidence" has been released, bolstering the old claim that women who excel at math and science are less feminine--or at any rate more masculine--than their sisters who can't balance a checkbook or tell the difference between a phenome and [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Jody Kolodzey
-
Giving Science the Finger
Generalizations based on hand shape not only are formulated from small pools of data, but smack of pseudo science.
MORE » -
Labor Paeans
Musician John McCutcheon will sometimes challenge rally organizers to name two speeches from the civil rights movement. “Everyone...
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
The positivist ethos has destroyed social science, and these kinds of ridiculous overgeneralizations are what results. There needs to be more emphasis on critical, qualitative research in psychology and other fields.
register a new account »Posting Security