Has the Change Led to Wins?

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments (4)

  Page 1 of 1 pages

  Solidarity, a French word eagerly accepted into the English language during the explosively revolutionary years before and after 1848, remains the defining concept of working-class hope. Those of us instilled with the visions of 19th-century European and American labor leaders as we waded into the thickets of 1960s New Left angst, can attest to the debilitating effects of schism and splintering. Organized labor’s fractious displays and divorces serve mostly to give notice to management and employers that the labor movement has wilted, lost the vigor with which it once withstood private-sector thugs and national guard assaults on its encampments of purpose along the boulevards of exploitation. An hourly, non-unionized worker and social-security retirement recipient, I find myself wondering how long it will be before American workers will stand together to resist their misuse, abuse and dehuminization in a nation as wasteful of capital as it is impoverished by ill will. A former business manager, foreman and supervisor, I would remind hourly workers that it is the purpose of management to convince its charges that it shares their concerns while it dishonors their dignit y, delighting in its cleverness and empowerment.  Progress begins with solidarity. Without it, opposition prospers. Labor must be housed under one roof; and must be especially discreet regarding its domestic squabbles. Any union’s success is every union’s success. Any division of union resources discredits uncompromising solidarity, the primary means by which workers, from pyramid builders onward, have held sway against their overlords. Get it together, literally.

  Posted by Bud Wizer on Oct 24, 2007 at 6:35 PM

  Let Solidarity be our watchword.  As a long time member of SEIU, I am not happy with the split from the AFL/CIO.  “United we stand, Divide we fall,” seems a most sensible philosopy to me. 
  Stern talking to WalMart turned my stomach. 
  Our previous local was absorbed into a giant new SEIU “local.”  I’ve yet to hear one word from the “New local.”

  Posted by frank67 on Oct 31, 2007 at 5:11 PM

  “Working together” on the local level in politics might have created some victories for individual Democratic Candidates; however, even if the U.S. House and Senate was filled completely with such worthless candidates working people wouldn’t win anything.

  Here in Minnesota, a State Senate Legislative Committee, comprised by a majority of Democrats, all elected with the full support of both the AFL-CIO and Change to Win couldn’t even muster enough votes to get a piece of legislation out of committee that would have helped save the St. Paul Ford Twin Cities Assembly Plant along with two-thousand jobs.

  The Republicans took one of the Democrats out for drinks and never stayed for the vote they were so confident these Democrats would do their dirty work for them.

  On the Iron Range a new cancer cluster has been detected among iron ore miners in the taconite industry. What did the Democrats, all endorsed, supported, and financed by the AFL-CIO and Change to Win propose? Single-payer, universal health care which was endorsed by 72% of the delegates to the last state convention of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer Labor Party? No; these Democrats called for another “study”... just what working people and their families need when they are facing foreclosures on their homes to pay for mounting medical bills.

  Over two-million American workers are employed in some 400 smoke-filled casinos strung out across the United States… all receiving poverty wages without any rights under state or federal labor laws; subjected to the most Draconian working conditions at the hands of mobsters who “manage” these so-called “Indian owned” casinos under special “Compacts.” Not one of these Democrats elected by the AFL-CIO or Change to Win have uttered a peep of protest.

  In fact, Michigan’s labor endorsed, labor supported, and labor financed Governor, Jennifer Granholm, recently negotiated another one of these dispicable “Compacts” with the Gun Lake Band outside of Grand Rapids, Michigan which will employ another 1,800 workers in another smoke-filled casino at poverty wages and without any rights under state or federal labor laws. And, the Michigan Legislature, fully endorsed by the AFL-CIO and Change to Win is considering approving this “Compact.” Worse yet, the Michigan AFL-CIO and Change to Win have remained silent… so, their candidates take their lead.

  These so-called labor “leaders” who can’t develop winning struggles at the negotiating table can’t develop winning strategies at the polls… at least not to the benefit of working people.

  The war in Iraq is a related matter… organized labor could take the lead from some of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union locals and shut this country right down until the war is brought to an end… but, here again, who has voted to cointinue funding this dirty war for oil and regional domination in Iraq? You got it… labor endorsed candidates which both the AFL-CIO and Change to Win worked together on to put in office. And labor backed Hillary Clinton has given Bush the go ahead to start another war with Iran.

  What we need is a labor movement which understands “class.”

  Alan L. Maki
  Director of Organizing,
  Midwest Casino Workers Organizing Council

  Posted by alanmaki on Oct 31, 2007 at 11:59 PM

  What the US labor movement needs is an analysis of the distorting effect of US imperialism on every aspect of working people’s lives in that country.  Whether it’s Change to Win or the AFL-CIO, the great silence in the US labor movement is the silence concerning the US’ role across the world, including interference in other countries’ labour movements, something which has occurred everywhere, including in my own, English speaking country.

  The Democrats are simply incapable of mounting any serious political challenge to the policies of the Republicans, because in reality, the argument amongst US elites is not that there is something deeply flawed about the idea of one country giving itself permission for unending aggression against any country in the world it doesn’t like. No, the real problem is that the Democrats think the Republicans are incompetent imperialists, while they would do a better job of ‘selling’ the imperialist idea to the rest of the world. 

  I understand the importance of supporting local candidates who can give assistance to unions and their role, but sometime soon, the US labor movement just has to consider why they have failed so badly, compared to labour movements in most other OECD countries, on issues such as health care, proper pensions schemes (superannuation) falling shares of output enjoyed by the working class, and the failure of the US education system (which is still at its best, one of the best in the world) to deliver anything like rough equality of opportunity, or social mobility if you prefer.

  It’s no good trying harder to do something which delivers the same dismal results. Unless of course, you think the outcomes are OK. That’s the problem with the US labour movement in my view. It is inextricably tied to the very assumptions and processes that have permitted the US to ignore with impunity pressing domestic issues, and throw its weight around the world as if it owned it, and the US labour movement is too weak both in a practical politcal sense, and ideologically, to challenge any of the sorry mess. That’s a pity, because there are very many really fine people in the US labour movemnt, doing it very hard under very tough conditions, but the leadership seems unable to resist the blandishments of power that a powerful, wealthy and ruthless ruling class is able to hold out every time.

  Posted by Jane Doe on Nov 1, 2007 at 2:30 AM

  Page 1 of 1 pages

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also by David Moberg

• Out of Control
  Too big to regulate, the banks need to be broken up.
• Labor’s New Leader
  The AFL-CIO stakes its future on Richard Trumka.
• The Retail Devolution
  Two new books explore corporate evil.
• Who’s Got the Power?
  Progressives find themselves outmaneuvered on healthcare reform.
• Not Your Parents’ Labor Movement
  Why the Republic sit-in failed to inspire other worker actions.
• Solidarity Reunited?
  Unions rally around shrunken UNITE HERE as it takes on its former ally.