When it came to sex, Bill Clinton made us debate the definition of “is.” Now, when it comes to economics, Hillary Clinton wants to debate the definition of “long,” claiming this week in Ohio that “I’ve long been a critic of the shortcomings of NAFTA.” True, Clinton has recently criticized NAFTA — the 1993 trade policy whose lack of labor and… return to article
-
subscribe to print magazine
-
email this article to a friend
-

Reader Comments (3)Page 1 of 1 pagesPage 1 of 1 pages -
register a new account »Posting Security
Also by David Sirota
- We Are What We Trade and How We Trade It
- TARP on Steroids
- A Party With No Punch
Three parables for progressives and the Grand Old (Democratic) Party. - A Tale of Two Supermen
- Say It Ain’t Snowe
- The Zombie Zeitgeist
Popular Discussions
- The 9/11 Faith Movement
Many Americans believe 9/11 was a conspiracy by the U.S. government
1979 posts since Jul 11 06 - What’s the 411 on 9/11?
891 posts since Dec 21 05 - Democrats: It’s the War
659 posts since Nov 1 05 - Was the Presidential Election Stolen?
462 posts since Jun 19 06 - A Fundamental History Lesson
The rise of National Socialism proved politics and religion don't mix
427 posts since Oct 10 05






