In writing a book about Harold Washington, Chicago’s first black mayor, I wondered whether it was the people or the person that made the movement. I had initially subscribed to the notion that the people produce the leadership, but my look back at the Washington years forced a change in my thinking. Washington’s success was largely a product of his… return to article
-
subscribe to print magazine
-
email this article to a friend
-
Reader Comments (8)Page 1 of 1 pages“In 2008, however, analysts are struggling to account for white America’s apparent willingness to hand the nation’s reins to a black man”
The answer is so very simple, but you and your type will not understand. White America does not care about race. We aren’t voting for Obama because he is black. **Race has nothing to do with it.**
Again, this is undoubtedly inconceivable to you and yours, since apparently all you can see is race. But perhaps if you talk to your children or their generation, you may get a glimmer of what America is really like.
Posted by wolf on Mar 18, 2008 at 2:27 PM Without “the movement” to erode and eventually negate the misguided role of race as a qualifier for anything, and the very striking (though not complete) changes in the US it has helped bring about, the man himself would likely have been held back and badly harassed had he shown any kind of similar ambition as he is showing now. Maybe he would have been attacked physically for being what used to be called “uppity”, i.e. not willing to stay put in the lower echelon of society or to kowtow to white-dominant social norms.
In the America-that-was, his complexion would have trumped everything else. He would have been a non-starter, and anyone not descended from certain varieties of European stock would have been too.
Fortunately “the movement” has had at least some real effect, as the staying power of Obama’s candidacy implies.
His eloquence and the context of grave discontent that so many feel toward the “same old” Republican and Democrat faces and policy agendas don’t hurt. There’s a lot of discontent being expressed, and people who back Obama imply either their sincere belief that he could do something substantive about the things that worry them or they devoutly hope he could. They apparently don’t identify him as one of the more senior leaders with whom many feel let down, but perceive him as a potential breath of fresh air in an otherwise stale and sickening political environment.
However, we don’t know yet whether he’s a Great Man. It’s entirely too soon to give him that tag. Star-power isn’t greatness. In fact, due to his facility with public speaking, it could be easy to associate the feelings we get when hearing a very adept speaker with our response to the rarity of true greatness, which people feel inspired by just as they can feel inspired by a speaker who possesses that “way with words”. A lot of people are motivated by that inspired response; for some it’s little more than a conditioned response. Or a fond hope.
Obama’s eloquence, like anyone’s, should be regarded as similar to glamour. It may be lovely or even captivating, but in the end the pleasing veneer is not necessarily the same as substance.
This is not to damn him in advance, only to say that it’s really the clear answers to hard policy questions that give the public the best idea of what he (or his opponent/s) would be most likely to do as Prez, and that will carry the day in Denver and ultimately in the big November contest.
The eloquence factor, like the novelty factor, should be kept in mind and should not be confused with the substance of clear policy agendas and their anticipated results.
The best attitude toward anyone trying to gain that level of power is that of healthy, skeptical, critical evaluation. it’s not wise to be too generous in interpreting promises from someone (anyone!) who is reaching for that kind of potency. But whether he gets the Democratic nom or not, at least a real corner has been turned, or at the very very least, we’ve begun to turn it. That will be true whether he wins or not. “The movement” has borne fruit, even if it isn’t (yet) a bumper crop.
Posted by Kuya on Mar 19, 2008 at 12:17 AM I think an excellent illustration of your point is this story, wolf. The whole episode turned out to be not a story of racial strife by the students, (the students didn’t know about nooses and they weren’t meant for black people) as Salim so wants us to believe, but about how a smug elite media created a story to fit their Salim-ilar world-view.
This country is very, very much wanting to move on from issues of race, and especially the young are doing incredibly well on that front. BUT for the continued efforts by Salim et al to keep us from doing so.
That’s the appeal of Obama to whites, and probably many blacks who long to be thought of as just Americans and not black Americans. He comes across as sympathetic to this desire, and seems to want to help it come about. Thus, we don’t think of him in racial terms—as it should be—as MLK would have wanted it be, presumably.
A challenge to Salim. Write an article about Obama focusing on issues, any issues, except race. It would be much more interesting, useful, positive and healthy for blacks and whites and everyone in between. And it would put an approving smile on Dr. King’s face.
Posted by Natalie on Mar 19, 2008 at 12:34 AM Natalie - thanks for the link, fascinating. When i had more time, the CS Monitor was one of my favorite reads.
I do not recall seeing Salim ever write anything that was not centered on racial issues (and those from an extremely limited point of view), so i very much doubt he will even consider your challenge seriously. I am sure he has had his own unique history to shape his viewpoint, but from mine he looks to be a dinosaur.
MLK had it right - “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” His dream, my dream and that of many many US citizens of all colors. A dream that has been becoming more and more true as time marches on - surely he would be proud of what we have become, even if we never reach perfection!
Kuya - good observations. I hope and pray if Obama gets elected (he got my vote in the primary and will get it in the election, if he makes it that far - Hillary would NOT) he succeeds. He could move the nation forward in leaps or bounds, or confirm the suspicions of some of the worst of us. Being the “first” of anything has both its risks and rewards, fairly or unfairly.
Posted by wolf on Mar 19, 2008 at 8:18 AM “The answer is so very simple, but you and your type will not understand. White America does not care about race. We aren’t voting for Obama...because he is black. “
“...a glimmer of what America is really like.”
Posted by Major Major on Mar 19, 2008 at 8:52 AM Salim Muwakkil; excellent reading and analysis of the times. B.O. there was H.W. the Honorable Mayor of Chicago Harold Washington. I remember the night Harold Washington won the mayoral election, Mayor Burns appeared at a press conference in Phoenix, Arizona that morning. I never forgot her words. She said about the election “It was like a religious revival, they came out of everywhere.”
Katt Williams the comedian, says, “If you don’t have no Haters then you aint’ fly! the minute nobody is hating on you, means you ain’t sh_t !”
Believe it or not your analysis of social emotional reactions from the racist in America is more out of jealousy then envy. America, being sports conscious, knows an exceptional candidate or competitor when they arrive.
When Tiger Woods entered golf, a winner. When Mike Jordan entered basketball, a winner. When Oprah start talkin about female gossip, a winner. When Serena and Venus entered tennis, two winners. Mr. Homerun Barry Bonds, a winner. Colin Powell, a winner until hit by a Condoleeza curve ball.
And now when an exceptional political sportsman arrives everybody knows the a major league player from the minor league players.
The greatest gift Presidential Candidate Senator Barack Hussein Obama brings to the table besides compent government; is the fact that Obama will unite America with Africa and Africa with America.
Africa the richest and most productive continent on Earth; second to none. Without Africa: America cannot survive.
Posted by S. O. Salahdeen on Mar 20, 2008 at 1:17 PM “Africa the richest and most productive continent on Earth”
Huh? Perhaps you can expand on what you mean by this statement?
Posted by wolf on Mar 21, 2008 at 8:02 AM Perhaps he’s talking about the richest thug dictators and diamond barons, and the most production of oxygen from CO2 via the rain-forests. (????)
Posted by Natalie on Mar 21, 2008 at 12:30 PM Page 1 of 1 pages -
register a new account »Posting Security
Also by Salim Muwakkil
Popular Discussions
- The 9/11 Faith Movement
Many Americans believe 9/11 was a conspiracy by the U.S. government
1968 posts since Jul 11 06 - What’s the 411 on 9/11?
891 posts since Dec 21 05 - Democrats: It’s the War
659 posts since Nov 1 05 - Was the Presidential Election Stolen?
459 posts since Jun 19 06 - A Fundamental History Lesson
The rise of National Socialism proved politics and religion don't mix
426 posts since Oct 10 05
© 2008 In These Times | Reprint Policy | Privacy Policy | Powered by Expression Engine | RSS Feeds
