Toward A New Washington Consensus
By David Sirota
You’ve probably heard that John McCain once said, “I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues.” This line is regularly referenced by Democratic television pundits as evidence that McCain is unprepared to lead the country during a recession. The criticism is certainly valid, but it ignores something more troubling. It’s not that… return to article
-
subscribe to print magazine
-
stay in touch with our email newsletter
Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.
-
email this article to a friend
-

Reader Comments (5)Page 1 of 1 pagesFrom our current perspective, I would say that knowing more about military issues is a VERY BIG PLUS.
Bush, by listening to Rumsfeld, Chaney and a few others who knew more about business, accepted their military strategies over those of professional military, long-term planning. We’ve now seen what a CEO run war is like. It seems the Middle Eastern opposition is less compliant than shareholders and a board of directors.
“Opinion-makers, think-tankers and other assorted conventional wisdom spewers depict McCain’s thesis as unquestioned truth.”
Yes, opinion-makers and think-tankers are where politicians get their “grasp” of economic reality.I just finished, “IKE, An American Hero”. For years he has been regarded as having presided our a “do-nothing eight year presidency. Nothing could be further from the truth. What Ike had going for him (and us) was a truly average American life experience in the best sense.
He opposed dropping the A-bomb on Japan, but implied he would use it to end the Korean War. He urged watchfulness over a too close relationship between the military and corporations (makers of weapons). He had made an exhaustive study of US manufacturing capability, national transportation problems and quietly changed racial discrimination policies within the military and in Washington D.C.
His family valued education so much he entered the military academy to get a college education which otherwise he could not afford. He had a natural curiosity for a wide range of subjects and was an avid reader. His interests ranged from sports to history, ideas to practical application, and a vision of big solutions to big problems. A big plus was his innate grasp of human nature and could unite diverse personalities toward a common goal.
What we need in the White House is someone who doesn’t just accept “expert” advice, but is willing to do some serious investigative study of the issues facing “ordinary” Americans. Ike was born into “ordinary” America and never forgot what real life is all about.
None of the three candidates appears to have any wide ranging qualities or interests. Hillary knows her way around the political board game. Obama knows how to arouse emotional support. Of the three only McCain’s military knowledge and experience is of real practical benefit to our nation.
I, for one, want a better selection than I have seen since 1952. I want someone with the imagination and drive to rise above the politically pandering pledges of handing money to citizens, temporary price cutting or simply “feeling our pain”. Someone with long-term solutions to long-avoided problems.
“Make no small plans, for they have no power to stir men’s souls."— Daniel Burnham
Posted by whattheheck on May 16, 2008 at 8:04 AM Amen, heck. I’ve been astonished for a long tilme at the relative shallowness and lack of relevant experience of practically everyone who ends up as a presidential candidate and finally president.
I know there are extraordinary minds and hearts out there among us. The mystery is why the best of these don’t ever seem to rise to high office.
Ironically, thanks largely to a media overwhelmingly populated by left-leaning partisans, a president that actually did possess extraordinary and relevant life and work experience, a humble yet deep understanding of what makes America exceptional, and the courage to act both in word and deed in order to assert it, was portrayed as an “amiable dunce”.
Posted by Natalie on May 16, 2008 at 2:54 PM While I don’t doubt that Canadians are aware, probably more than Americans as they have better media than here in the US. All you have to do is look to the 900 layoffs announced April 28th, following the 1,000 in January at the GM plant in Oshawa.
But I have to take issue with the portrayal of Jack Layton in the article. As likely leader of the NDP in the federal elections, he would be a prime minister (PM) if they won a majority of the seats, or could be PM in a minority situation like the current administration in Canada. However, the NDP’s chance in winner take all member of parliament (MP) elections, means he has the same chance as Ralph Nader to lead his country, and politically comes from the same place. The NDP would do better with proportional seating of MPs, where the percentages of the popular vote throughout the whole country, so that if they garnered 15% of the national vote, they would get 15% of the MP seats. This would also reduce the Parti Quebecois number of MPs in Parliament.
That being said, I think more people worldwide are looking at these trade policies as being for the benefit of the moneyed elites, not the nation or the general populace. I think Jeff Faux’s book The Global Class War covers this topic very well, and I recommend it highly.
Posted by chaoslegs on May 16, 2008 at 11:09 PM Yes, there is a populist uprising, and many of Obama’s followers seem to be part of it. I’m amazed, though, that Sirota included Obama himself. Since when is he “NAFTA -bashing”? He had to be dragged, kicking and screaming, to even mumble something about renegotiating the trade agreements. Remember his unfortunate remark about Pennsylvanian blue-collar voters? He seems temperamentally incapable of recognizing the validity of a populist upsurge even when it hits him in the head.
What I found most eye-opening is the list of Obama’s economics and domestic advisors that was published in the Chicago Tribune, Monday:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/services/newspaper/printedition/monday/chi-obama_m mon_nusep17,0,3844054.story?page=3
Michael Froman - Citigroup bank exec., pro-free trade & “business-friendly”, former Pres. Clinton advisor
Austan Goolsbee - professor of business at U. of Chicago
David Cutler - Pres. Clinton health economist, opposes single-payer
David Blumenthal - Director, Institute for Health Policy, Harvard Medical School
Jeffrey Liebman - Economist, Harvard professor and member of Clinton White House Council of Economic Advisers. Research has focused on role of earned income tax credit in moving people from welfare to work
Dan Tarullo - International trade expert, Georgetown law professor and former Bill Clinton economic adviser i.e. GATT & NAFTA proponent
Eric Holder - Clinton deputy attorney general
Cass Sunstein - University of Chicago law professor
Laurence Tribe - Harvard law professor
Cassandra Butts - Senior policy adviser to House Democratic leader Richard Gephardt
Note the total dearth of labor economists, economic development experts, experts in “green” economics, environmental advisors, anyone to educate him on the opposition viewpoint to the current trade agreements or a single populist. Thanks to Bush & Co. we’re facing possible economic meltdown (and all the suffering that would accompany it) if the next administration doesn’t implement creative means to grow the U.S. economy, and restore some manufacturing (preferably green) in order to boost the demand side (purchasing power). It’s what voters are looking for.
Posted by ClearEye on May 22, 2008 at 7:32 PM Cleareye,
Obama’s dismal list of econ advisors is typical of how presidents deal with the US economy. The only thing worse has been putting “successful” business leaders in charge of military operations.
We’ve had Wall Street and university “experts” in the Fed (Greenspan and Bernake) Treasury (Paulson) while the mortgage fraud built, busted and now is bailed.
If we can’t get someone willing to personally understands the problems we could probably do far better with the average housewife advising him on how get a dollar’s worth of anything.
This list from the Trib is packed with the usual theoretical bozos (Think Long Term Capital) who never shop and are personally protected with tenure.
Posted by whattheheck on May 25, 2008 at 7:16 AM Page 1 of 1 pages -
register a new account »Posting Security
Also by David Sirota
Popular Discussions
- The 9/11 Faith Movement
Many Americans believe 9/11 was a conspiracy by the U.S. government
1968 posts since Jul 11 06 - What’s the 411 on 9/11?
891 posts since Dec 21 05 - Democrats: It’s the War
659 posts since Nov 1 05 - Was the Presidential Election Stolen?
459 posts since Jun 19 06 - A Fundamental History Lesson
The rise of National Socialism proved politics and religion don't mix
426 posts since Oct 10 05
© 2008 In These Times | Reprint Policy | Privacy Policy | Powered by Expression Engine | RSS Feeds






