An Anti-Clinton For VP

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments (2)

  Page 1 of 1 pages

  I would hardly call Clinton’s defeat “resounding,” and the assertion that Obama “faced at least as much racism” as Clinton faced sexism is preposterous.

  Racism has become, almost in a good way (almost!), something in the public sphere that is discussed much more than actually engaged in (which is not to suggest that racism is not rampant, merely that public admission of racism has become somewhat taboo).

  Sexism on the other hand, is so casual as to be practically unnoticed. Consider, for example, this from the Huffington Post:

  “Michelle Obama Vs. Cindy McCain: A Study In Styles

  “Every first lady needs to develop a signature style - a look that goes beyond the vagaries of fashion and trends. Cindy is some way towards achieving this. Her clothing consistency is satisfying: always immaculate, with never a hair out of place. But this striving for perfection is also her un-doing: she doesn’t know how to have fun with fashion.

  “Michelle, however, is showing enormous potential. She’s starting to own the puffed sleeve - it works for her on blouses and even on a red tailored suit that she wore recently. But the most obvious clue that Michelle possesses the first lady X-Factor came last month when she addressed a high school. Is that a belted dress or a trench worn flasher-style? Who knows, but it is in these mysterious details that fashion-forward presidential campaigns are made.”

  Hillary Clinton was subjected to endless nasty snipes about her clothes, her makeup, her voice, and even her cleavage. Obama got lapel pins.

  Having said all that, I think you have a point about “Clintonism.”

  Posted by monkyhead on Jun 13, 2008 at 12:45 PM

  Jim Webb should be the VP. He certainly is an economic populist, he wrote a great op-ed not long after his election discussing the widening gap between the haves and have nots. Beyond that, his military credentials give a boost to the ticket for Obama. And finally, he’s from Virginia, a state that would be a great early election day coop if it went blue.

  Hillary indeed represents the past. This election needs to end the Clinton/Bush era. It’s time to move on. If I were Obama, I would offer Hillary a cabinet post such as Health and Human Services. She could probably get more accomplished in health care in that job than as VP anyway. Whether she would want to vacate the Senate is another question.

  Posted by Jon B on Jun 15, 2008 at 1:18 AM

  Page 1 of 1 pages

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also by David Sirota

• We Are What We Trade and How We Trade It
  
• TARP on Steroids
  
• A Party With No Punch
  Three parables for progressives and the Grand Old (Democratic) Party.
• A Tale of Two Supermen
  
• Say It Ain’t Snowe
  
• The Zombie Zeitgeist