Without a computer and the knowledge to get online wirelessly, "free Wi-Fi" isn't truly free and accessible. Offering the service to people without computers is like telling a child to pick out anything in the toy store as long as she can pay for it. [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Megan Tady
-
AT&T Wants to Monopolize Everything
If you're one of AT&T's 96 million customers, no doubt you've experienced the frustrations of dropped calls...
MORE » -
What You Need to Know About the Assault on NPR and PBS
Congressional attacks on public media seem to come as regularly as NPR fundraising drives. Every year, as the...
MORE » -
Keeping Up With Community Radio
Commercial broadcasters are less than thrilled that they'll soon have new neighbors on the nation's radio spectrum. They're...
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
It’s worth mentioning that the original plan to provide the service for free was hotly contested in the courts by all the Internet Service Providers in the area. If it hadn’t been for those corporations fighting this service so vehemently, we may very well have seen the free network that we were all originally promised.
My personal belief, I think Earthlink took control of the network in an effort to intentionally bury it. I live in Philadelphia, and attempted to buy into the network last fall. Earthlink basically told me that I couldn’t do it. Some of my friends who had gotten on the network complained of irregular service, complicated set-up, and abysmal customer service. I was not surprised at all when Earthlink pulled out, blaming lack of interest on their failure to provide a service that might have connected thousands, but that would have probably forced the company to run at a loss. It reminds me of the movie “Who Killed the Electric Car?” insofar as a good idea was killed by profit-motivated interest.
The mere fact that the network, despite its less-than-ideal manifestation, is still around should be seen as a victory in and of its self. Keeping the network alive is an important step toward completing its ultimate vision; and at present, I think that’s about the best Nutter will be able to do. Once the network is firmly established as a way of life here, then we might be able to speak realistically about universal provision. In the mean time, I think most of us here are counting our blessings.
register a new account »Posting Security