For six years, with few exceptions, the Washington press corps has been cheerleading for the Iraq War – and the pattern is continuing in Campaign 2008 with the endless demands that Barack Obama apologize for not supporting the troop "surge." On Sunday's "Meet the Press," NBC's Tom [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Robert Parry
-
In Libya, a Bloodbath Looms
NATO’s war in Libya, which began with high-minded declarations about “protecting civilians,” now appears likely to end...
MORE » -
Rep. Ryan’s Free-Market ‘Death Panels’
The consequences of three decades of anti-government Reaganism and free-market extremism are now coming clearly into view, a...
MORE » -
Budget Crisis? Duh, Tax the Rich!
A great tragedy of the United States is that the answer to many of the country's domestic problems...
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
Obama was probably right on the likely ineffectiveness of “The Surge.” By the time Bush got around to canning Rumsfeld and sending an additional 21,000 troops to restore order the 20+million Iraqis were in total disarray.
CENTCOM had three scenarios planned over a ten year period regarding Iraq.
1. No US troops
Interesting Obama article in the New Yorker with the controversial cover of Michelle and Barack.
This guy is just another typical politician with a great sense of how to seize the moment
register a new account »Posting Security