I'm no football fan, but I paid close attention to Saturday's preseason showdown between the Washington Redskins and the Buffalo Bills – not for what was happening in the game, but was happening at the game. The Federal Communications Commission used the stadium to test mobile [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Megan Tady
-
AT&T Wants to Monopolize Everything
If you're one of AT&T's 96 million customers, no doubt you've experienced the frustrations of dropped calls...
MORE » -
What You Need to Know About the Assault on NPR and PBS
Congressional attacks on public media seem to come as regularly as NPR fundraising drives. Every year, as the...
MORE » -
Keeping Up With Community Radio
Commercial broadcasters are less than thrilled that they'll soon have new neighbors on the nation's radio spectrum. They're...
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
How do we inform folks in the country sides that THE WASHINGTON LOBBYISTS BULLDOGS is trying to shut them out of the digital age?
One crucial thing that Ms. Tady doesn’t discuss—in this article nor in last month’s re Philadelphia’s wi-fi—is the issue of potential harmful health effects from ongoing ambient exposure to low-frequency radio frequency radiation such as that posed by wi-fi. There are significant indications that our ever-increasing exposure to wireless transmissions, along with those from cellular communications, may eventually manifest as a public health nightmare on the scale of cigarette smoking. Of course, the industry—along with our federal agencies—proclaims this level of radiation as safe for human health, ignoring the question of cumulative exposure and DNA damage; no extensive, independent longterm studies have ever been done. A good place to begin exploring this issue is by checking out the report released in 2007 by a team of top international scientists, at www.bioinitiative.org.
When wi-fi type signals penetrate walls (e.g.., wi-max), they expose all of us (incl. our children) indiscriminately, and there’s no way to opt out. That, in my estimation, cannot be called “democracy” or “progressive”. What’s needed instead is a civic broadband system using advanced fiber optics to transmit the signal to and from households that want it; of course, that costs a lot more money, but provides the opportunity to also offer competitve cable TV options and receive revenue to help pay for the system. It’s time to take a longer-time horizon, more precautionary, approach to this and other new technologies, so we don’t one day regret our shortsighted decisions.
Alexander Binik, Exec. Director, DE-Toxics Institute, Fairfax, CA
oops! someone seems unaware of the healthdangers of wi-fi.
while it’s being banned or removed in some other countries, especially near schools, our country is trying to impose it . how backward.
i would consider myself lucky to live where there was no wi-fi, but all i could do was throw the router out and plug my laptop in,
register a new account »Posting Security