At least at first glance, Andrew Bacevich might seem an unlikely candidate to have become one of the Iraq War's fiercest critics. A graduate of West Point and a Vietnam War veteran, Bacevich spent 23 years in the military before retiring as a colonel. In the [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by David Barsamian
-
The Radical Conservative
Vietnam veteran and author Andrew Bacevich on American decadence and the failure of the Iraq War.
MORE » -
Citizen Gore Vidal
Elections won't reverse the decline of American democracy, the prolific literary legend says
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
If all the US was looking for was a place to make a template, why not Yemen? Or even Syria? All that Mr. Bacevich has shown is that even an intelligent and broad-minded knee jerk apologist is still a knee jerk apologist.
Didn’t you read the interview? Bacevich didn’t say he agreed with the Bush “template” (in fact he disagreed with the Iraq War at the beginning), he was simply explaining what the Bush mindset was.
To explain others actions is not being an apologist, that’s analysis. He even described that “template” as bizarre. And that’s an apologist?
So I again wonder, did you bother to actually read the interview with full attention or did you just scan for highlights as you multitasked other things? I ask this because that is how Americans read and take in information these days, thereby usually not even understanding what they read.
register a new account »Posting Security