All biographical films garner charges of omissions; director Steven Soderbergh's Che actively courts them. The worst way to approach this two-part, four-and-a-half-hour anti-biopic is to see it as a film expressly about Ernesto "Che" Guevara. Those who expect a full portrait of the man will [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Ben Kenigsberg
-
Che the Man, Not the T-shirt
Soderbergh’s Che refuses to typecast the revolutionary.
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
I have never understood the bourgeoisie chic fascination with El Che. The North American children who sport his image have no idea what they are doing. We’re not talking progressive politics here, we’re talking bloody communist revolution. Is that what these products of a capitalist society that educated them really stand for?
I have friends in South America who have pictures of Che on the wall of their living rooms. I can understand that. Crap on my head all day and call it democracy and capitalism and I wouldn’t just be a Che fan, I would become a Marxist revolutionary. When you don’t have equality under the law, free speech, or the ballot box, your options narrow.
Two different worlds…
register a new account »Posting Security