Along with millions of others around the world, I was appalled by the kidnapping of BBC correspondent Alan Johnston in the Gaza Strip on March 12, 2007. As his disappearance lengthened, I was stricken with the fear that he’d be murdered by his captors—members of a fringe terrorist group known as “The Army of Islam”—but was duly relieved when he emerged… return to article
-
subscribe to print magazine
-
email this article to a friend
-
Reader Comments (2)Page 1 of 1 pagesThere’s that word again, “balance.” You’re hearing it everywhere in the media these days, and it is dutifully repeated when forced to confront or address yet another Israeli atrocity. Even a book review addressing the systematic brutalization of the Palestinians must be “balanced” with at least “one” terrorist attack mentioned at the end, creating the false impression of equality in guilt.
Israeli barbarism, particularly during their recent debacles in Lebanon and Gaza, has opened the eyes of many previously exposed to 50 years of unflinching media support for any and all Israeli positions, a period during which I might add, the words “balance” and “fair-minded” were conspicuously absent.
When considering the “original sin” of Zionism (taking the land of the indigenous population without their consultation or consent), the systematic expansionist policies that followed the creation of Israel (despite the party in power and irrespective of resistance level activities), the horrendous military and economic inequity between the parties, not to mention the nearly 100-1 casualty ratios, the cry for “balance” and “fair-mindedness” in coverage rings hollow indeed.
The desire for peace so eloquently stated by Mohammad Adwan at the end of the piece will require addressing these fundamental realities, not by pretending to be “fair-minded,” or by agreeing to some illusionary “balance.”
Posted by Imran on Apr 3, 2009 at 6:54 PM That word “balance,” is not in the article. It was an editor’s choice in summarizing the article at the top. The book’s author, Alan Johnston, leans toward the Palestinians in his sympathies.
But he is “fair-minded,” a quality we generally want in a journalist. He notes with sadness that both sides are flawed in how they relate to the other. This is not a game to him in which there’s one team that he roots for and the other side that he hates. He understands the complexities of this conflict, which according to Imran is a bad thing.
Posted by rseliger on Apr 27, 2009 at 5:58 PM Page 1 of 1 pages -
register a new account »Posting Security
Also by Ralph Seliger
- Jews on J Street
A new liberal Washington lobby comes of age at its first annual conference. - Should Neve Gordon Be Punished?
An Israeli professor's support for the Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions (BDS) movement sparks controversy. - Einstein and Israel
The great scientist was both a Zionist and bi-nationalist—a fact too complex for the author of a new book to accept. - The Israel Lobbies: Left, Right and Center
A new book helpfully details Jewish-American lobbying organizations spanning the political spectrum. - Israel’s Center Does Not Hold
Netanyahu's coalition begins to govern, as the world awaits a two-state solution. - ‘Kidnapped’ in Gaza
A BBC correspondent's book--now available in the United States--details his Gaza kidnapping and collects balanced reportage from the Middle East and Central Asia.
Popular Discussions
- The 9/11 Faith Movement
Many Americans believe 9/11 was a conspiracy by the U.S. government
1979 posts since Jul 11 06 - What’s the 411 on 9/11?
891 posts since Dec 21 05 - Democrats: It’s the War
659 posts since Nov 1 05 - Was the Presidential Election Stolen?
462 posts since Jun 19 06 - A Fundamental History Lesson
The rise of National Socialism proved politics and religion don't mix
427 posts since Oct 10 05
© 2009 In These Times | Reprint Policy | Privacy Policy | Powered by Expression Engine | RSS Feeds
