Page 1 of 1 pages
We can be proud as a Nation that we have the best leaders that money can buy. In addition, unlike some crummy third world despots, our guys stay bought. When you send that person to the White House or Congress, you can rest assured that your dollars will keep working for years to come.
What’s the difference between a working prostitute and someone running for office here? Well there are just some things no self respecting hooker will do for any amount of money, while most of those running for office will do anything for a large enough contribution.
Posted by Paul N. Sidio on Aug 4, 2003 at 4:21 PM
Your story misses the point that
Howard Dean’s money,
while widely reported, is truly
amazing because 93,000 small donors
who are fed up with the DLC, the
whiny self-absorbed Greens, the
turncoat same ole D.C. Democrats,
and most of all, the radical right
Bushites, donated 7.5 million at an
average of $75 per donor.
Posted by Colleen Fowles on Aug 5, 2003 at 2:29 PM
The American political process has become so corrupted and polluted by money, that I see no hope in saving it. The concept of “one man (or woman), one vote” is long gone. Do you think your vote is as important as say, Richard Mellon-Scaife’s or Ken Lay’s? If you said yes, you should have your friggin’ head examined. Wealthy individuals and corporations control the politicians of both parties and most politicians could give a shit about the average American! That is what is so appealing about Howard Dean. He is truly trying to build a grassroots movement, where Big Money does not call all the shots. I should know, my brother-in-law lives in Iowa, is a poor librarian and has Howard Dean call him twice at home, to solicit his viewpoints!
Until we severely restrict the amount individuals can give to candidates, and prohibit PACs, corporations, and other non-individuals from giving one nickel in hard or soft money, we are going to have a corrupt system where vermin like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney get elected.
And don’t let some right-wing Dittohead try to tell you that restricting campaign contributions equates to restricting free speech. That isn’t free speech - It’s bought-and-paid-for speech.
Posted by Stephen Kriz on Aug 6, 2003 at 12:10 PM
To those jumping on the Howard Dean bandwagen, do you really believe that when push comes to shove he’s NOT going to accept the big dollars from corporations and PACS if he should do well in the early primaries?
Dean is not a liberal/progressive by any means, he is only riding a wave of anti-war, anti-Bush sentiment.
Dennis Kucinich at the recent AFL/CIO debate called Dean out on wanting to raise the retirement age for social security and Dean promptly lied and claimed he never said that. Do we really need ANOTHER liar as president?
I suppose that is what our corrupt political system produces, liars as our leaders. Dean went to Yale just like Bush, maybe Yale offers the course Lying 101. I have no influence in regards to the moneyed elections, but I still will look hopefully for an honest politician to vote for, Dean is off my list.
Posted by Jon Barber on Aug 11, 2003 at 6:38 AM
Dean strikes me as basically conservative and not very honest where it counts. In the Dem Party’s own terms, the left’s candidate is Kucinich.
Posted by Charles Jannuzi on Aug 29, 2003 at 6:17 PM
The problem with Kucinich is that he cannot win a general election. Oh, and he’s also a maniac.
Dean’s lie about SS age isn’t a very big lie compared to the deceptions of Dubya. Maybe not even as big as Clinton lying about where his donkey’s been.
Posted by Donkey Show on Sep 4, 2003 at 11:12 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
Reader Comments
We can be proud as a Nation that we have the best leaders that money can buy. In addition, unlike some crummy third world despots, our guys stay bought. When you send that person to the White House or Congress, you can rest assured that your dollars will keep working for years to come.
What’s the difference between a working prostitute and someone running for office here? Well there are just some things no self respecting hooker will do for any amount of money, while most of those running for office will do anything for a large enough contribution.
Your story misses the point that
Howard Dean’s money,
while widely reported, is truly
amazing because 93,000 small donors
who are fed up with the DLC, the
whiny self-absorbed Greens, the
turncoat same ole D.C. Democrats,
and most of all, the radical right
Bushites, donated 7.5 million at an
average of $75 per donor.
The American political process has become so corrupted and polluted by money, that I see no hope in saving it. The concept of “one man (or woman), one vote” is long gone. Do you think your vote is as important as say, Richard Mellon-Scaife’s or Ken Lay’s? If you said yes, you should have your friggin’ head examined. Wealthy individuals and corporations control the politicians of both parties and most politicians could give a shit about the average American! That is what is so appealing about Howard Dean. He is truly trying to build a grassroots movement, where Big Money does not call all the shots. I should know, my brother-in-law lives in Iowa, is a poor librarian and has Howard Dean call him twice at home, to solicit his viewpoints!
Until we severely restrict the amount individuals can give to candidates, and prohibit PACs, corporations, and other non-individuals from giving one nickel in hard or soft money, we are going to have a corrupt system where vermin like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney get elected.
And don’t let some right-wing Dittohead try to tell you that restricting campaign contributions equates to restricting free speech. That isn’t free speech - It’s bought-and-paid-for speech.
To those jumping on the Howard Dean bandwagen, do you really believe that when push comes to shove he’s NOT going to accept the big dollars from corporations and PACS if he should do well in the early primaries?
Dean is not a liberal/progressive by any means, he is only riding a wave of anti-war, anti-Bush sentiment.
Dennis Kucinich at the recent AFL/CIO debate called Dean out on wanting to raise the retirement age for social security and Dean promptly lied and claimed he never said that. Do we really need ANOTHER liar as president?
I suppose that is what our corrupt political system produces, liars as our leaders. Dean went to Yale just like Bush, maybe Yale offers the course Lying 101. I have no influence in regards to the moneyed elections, but I still will look hopefully for an honest politician to vote for, Dean is off my list.
Dean strikes me as basically conservative and not very honest where it counts. In the Dem Party’s own terms, the left’s candidate is Kucinich.
The problem with Kucinich is that he cannot win a general election. Oh, and he’s also a maniac.
Dean’s lie about SS age isn’t a very big lie compared to the deceptions of Dubya. Maybe not even as big as Clinton lying about where his donkey’s been.
register a new account »Posting Security