I believe we are at the threshold of a fundamental change in our popular economic thought,” Franklin Roosevelt announced during his 1932 campaign for the presidency. “In the future,” he predicted, “we are going to think less about the producer and more about the consumer.” Why, [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
FOLLOW US
Also by Sandy Zipp
-
Jane Jacobs, Reconsidered
Jane Jacobs transformed urban planning
MORE » -
The Price Isn’t Right
I believe we are at the threshold of a fundamental change in our popular economic thought,” Franklin Roosevelt...
MORE » -
Poetry and Velorution
The Immortal Class: Bike Messengers and the Cult of Human Power By Travis Hugh Culley Villard 324 pages, $19.95 Bike...
MORE »
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA
Invest in the news you need. In These Times is a nonprofit, reader-supported magazine and website.
subscribe today for $19.95!
SAVE 53% OFFTHE NEWSSTAND PRICE!
MOST READ
- Why Conservatives Can’t Fix Poverty
- The Girl’s Guide to Staying Safe Online
- Siri and the High-Tech Gender Gap
- It’s the Stupid Republicans, Stupid
- True Crime Finance Stories
- Is the Federal Government Helping to Bust Unions?
- Anger Sowing Seeds of a New Consumer Movement
- What Can Labor Learn?
- Marching Off the Cliff
- New Eden, Old Devils

Reader Comments
Is consumerism really inherently individualistic? I do think that it is important to analyze the ways in which consumerism genuinely atomizes people. At the same time, however, one has to remember that people do not necessarily always experience consumerism as isolated individuals. Many suburban homeowners who attempt to maximize property value are attempting to do so at least partially for the sake of their children. Gifts are a huge part of consumerism, and advertisements often appeal to buyers on the basis of how a product can be used to help others, though the other people included in the community of potential gift recipients is often quite limited.
register a new account »Posting Security