Protesting Too Little?

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments (7)

  Page 1 of 1 pages

  Protesting too little?
  Damn right it is!
  Screw protests! They are a waste of time and energy that could be used in REAL opposition efforts. Nobody bothers doing any real work for “opposing the Bush agenda.” All that gets accomplished is a big picnic with a bunch of badly hand painted signs that no one can even read. It’s a pep rally with no game. Protests don’t effect political action. They just make the protesters feel better about themselves.
  “Mister President! We have a serious situation! A bunch of idiots are out in the August sun with effigies of you painted on their underwear! They’ve succeeded in memorizing a slogan, and they’re CHANTING it!”
  “We may as well admit defeat, Dick. HOW can we possibly execute our diabolical schemes now? It’s been nice working with you.”

  Dick Gregory had this point figured out forty years ago. He asked an audience if they wanted to make some changes. He told them not to be going out marching in the streets “singing them old tunes.”
  You want to make a difference? All you got to do is organize.
  He gave an example.
  (I’m paraphrasing because my vinyl is back home.)
  You want to get the right to vote at 18? You can do that. All you got to do is organize. You get all the people you can to organize a boycott. You write the meat packing industries, and you tell them you represent the young people of America who want the right to vote at 18, and until the meat companies go to congress and lobby, and you get the right to vote at 18, you’re going to stop eating meat for five days out of the week.
  What do you think would happen? Stop eating meat for five days out of the week? What do you think these ol cattle rustlers in Texas would do? They’d blow the doors off of Congress “C’mere, boy, we wanna talk to you!”

  It’s just an example. Use your imagination. Who has the power? Who can you make work for you?

  Here’s an idea. Soda. It’s a multi-billion dollar industry. Pepsi can build a space shuttle? They can do it thanks to you and your support through all of those ubiquitous vending machines and convenience store shelves of cans and bottles of stuff your body doesn’t even need. Tell Pepsi and Coca Cola that it’s time for them to speak for you, and until they lobby on your behalf, you’ll be drinking anything BUT Cocoa Cola and Pepsi products. If you’re organized, it will show up on their bottom line. And that will make them listen.

  You’ll need a list of demands, though. “oppose the Bush agenda” is a good start, but it’s nowhere near ready to come out of the oven. Personally I’d suggest an environmental angle, because that’s me. I think that while we are fighting all these other battles, the most serious threat to us all is quietly gathering around us in the form of global warming, poisoned air and water and disrupted ecosystems. I’d tell ‘em to take a bold stance on global warming, mercury emissions, pesticide addiction, renewable energy sources, that kind of thing. That’s just me.

  One thing’s for sure. Protesting won’t do a damn bit of good, except maybe satisfy the egos of the protesters. While you’re rehearsing your little politico follies or painting your underwear, electronic voting machines are being installed to take you out of the equation altogether. Then you can burn to a crisp in the August sun and sing “We Shall Overcome” until you’re blue in the face. The tanks and the toxins and the tax cuts for the rich will be rolling along smoothly.

  Posted by mrandmrsjohnqsmith on Jul 7, 2004 at 4:27 PM

  This last person is defiantly right.  I agree that hand painted signs are worthless.  Chanting against these politicians is worthless and not to mention laughed at by the other people who could possibly be convinced. Walking around in underwear to make a point about governmental issues.  What’s the connection? 
  However, there is a point to public gatherings.  Meeting people who are for or against the same issues you are.  Also getting more information that main stream media is never going to give you. 
  Imagine if the million people who don’t have health care or pay out there ass in heath care decided they weren’t going to work until they got affordable or free health care.  How long would that strike last?

  Posted by Jonny on Jul 7, 2004 at 8:50 PM

  Although I’d love to see massive anti-Bush demonstrations during the Republican convention, I can’t help but agree with everything that Mr. and Mrs. John Q Smith said.

  Protest demonstrations are a waste of time. They merely attract a fringe of left-wing dysfunctionals whose antics either frighten or alienate the very people whose support we need.
  Worse, none of these weirdos vote, or if they do, they throw their vote away on people who couldn’t get elected as the county dog catcher.

  Sorry, Greenies, and Naderites, this message is specifically directed to you. Have you ever figured out why conservative Republicans are working so hard to help Nader out? Do you honestly believe, like Ralph Nader or the Greens do, that you are drawing votes away from Bush and the Republicans? If so, you’re either too deluded or to naive to govern effectively.

  Instead of the idiotic free-for-alls, so dear to the hearts of so many leftist radicals, I’d rather the Democrats and their progressive allies stage pro-Kerry,  pro-Democratic and pro-democratic rallies throughout the country accompanied by massive voter registration campaigns. In this election, protests have meaning only if they translate into anti-Bush, anti-Republican, pro-democratic votes.

  P.S. The pro-democratic is NOT a typographicalerror. Are you familiar with the ideas of Porter Goss, Bush’s nominee as the new director of the CIA or of the new Superintelligence agence designed to supersede the CIA? Goss has proposed that the CIA, with the consent of the president, have powers to arrest American citizens whom the CIA and the president deem a threat to American security. Does that register in your minds? This election is not a contest between so-called red states or blue states, Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives (or whether liberals want to call themselves progressives or leftists or Greens.)It is an election to save American democracy from those who would turn the CIA into the KGB. Maybe Porter Goss and his desire to suspend habeas corpus in the name of national security isn’t an issue yet - but believe me, it should be.

  Posted by William Joseph Miller on Aug 20, 2004 at 3:43 PM

  i completly dissagree wit all of you guys if we are given our 1st amendment, which is freedom of speech then why not take advantage of that..POWER TO THE PROTESTORS ATLEAST THEY R TRYING TO MAKE A DIFFRENCEN SOMEWAY SOMEHOW…ATLEAST THEY SHOW COURAGE AND NOT JUST SETTLE FOR ANYTHING THAT COMES THERE WAY…THEY LET THE NATION KNOW THAT THEY WILL FIGHT UNTIL THEY GET WHAT THEY WANT… WE CAN ORGANIZE AS MUCH AS WE CAN..BUT WHILE WE DO THAT ..IT WILL WAIST OUR TIME…BECAUSE IN THE PROCESS OF THAT THE CHANGES WILL BEGIN TO HAPPEN..AND IF YOU GUYS HAVE GR8 IDEAS WHY DONT YOU GUYS GO OUT AND BE LEADERS OF THESE ASSOCIATIONS AND MAKE A DIFFERENCE INSTEAD OF INSULTING THOSE WHO ATLEAST TRY TO DO SOMTHING FOR THEMSELVES AND THERE COUNTRY.

  Posted by angie on Aug 29, 2004 at 4:24 AM

  well i agree with angie alot because its tru that they are making there voices be heard and they are trying to make a diffrence in this world. i also beleive that us people do need to speek louder and if we have and idea speek it out to the world not keep it to are slefs that way we can make a diffrense in this world

  Posted by lucy on Aug 29, 2004 at 4:35 AM

  I ugree wif lusy an anjie! Yew peepul aut 2 fait fer yer cuntree steda bad-moufin awl thu tym! Git a ejikashin!

  Posted by maik yer diffrence herd! on Aug 29, 2004 at 5:55 AM

  Street demonstrations are mostly cultural events.  They sometimes encourage participants to join in political events. 
    Political events include resistance to law- and rule-making of the congressional majority and the legal/ownership moves of the big corporations.  More importantly they include the organizing and running of alternative institutions, however tentative. 
    Every little progressive civic group, grassroots group, is a challenge to established institutions.  When they get together and start defending or rebuilding local water works, family farms, and locally-owned radio stations, they foster an alternative system which Middle America will embrace when corporate businesses go too far.  Then we come full circle to where a new/old culture of community is thriving.  Goodbye, corporate domination.  Hello, regulated businesses.  Hello, normal living.

  Posted by Dave Lewit on Sep 5, 2004 at 1:23 PM

  Page 1 of 1 pages

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Also by Dave Lindorff

• Radioactive Wounds of War
  Tests on returning troops suggest serious health consequences of depleted uranium use in Iraq
• Before Sunset
  A broad coalition is pushing Congress to rein in the Patriot Act
• GMs Healthcare Double Standard
  Bad ideology trumps good business
• Beating the Boomers
  Why Bush and Co. are racing to cut Social Security
• A Milli Vanilli President
  
• Protesting Too Little?
  Homeland Security wants to cage dissent at this summer’s political conventions