Help In These Times raise $5,000 in two weeks! Donate now!
PrintDiscuss
News » February 24, 2003

Good Government, Green and Simple

By Brett Schaeffer

Matt Gonzalez, president of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller
A few days before President Bush gave his State of Union speech on January 28, Green Party officials asked Matt Gonzalez if he wanted to travel to Washington to give the Greens’ rebuttal.

Gonzalez, the newly elected president of San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors, politely declined. “I think it’s not what my [board] colleagues want me to do, that’s not what the public here wants me to do. They want to see me grounded in local issues and focused on that,” said Gonzalez, speaking the morning before the President’s speech from his spacious office in San Francisco’s City Hall.

In a city of nearly 800,000, Gonzalez’s position as board president makes him, at least for the next two years, the second highest-ranking official in San Francisco’s government, next to the mayor. (Because San Francisco is organized as both a city and county, there is no city council: The Board of Supervisors governs both.)

The position also makes him one of the country’s most prominent Greens. While Gonzalez downplays his broader role for the party, other members hail his ascension as particularly significant. “Matt’s election energized the whole party,” says Susan King, a member of the San Francisco Green Party’s County Council.

Fundamentally, Gonzalez’s election means there is a Green in a high-profile city who is in charge of making committee assignments, pushing legislation and building coalitions to pass laws, and he firmly believes that’s where his focus should be.

Referring to the knock he’s heard from most critics—that Greens can’t govern—he says: “One of the things I’ve been trying to do is re-appropriate the idea of fundamental city services back from the more conservative members of the board, and to try to get away from this notion that the fundamental idea of government serving people is not a progressive value. In fact, serving people is a progressive value. That is what it’s all about, ultimately.”

Gonzalez, 37, understands that there is broader significance to his election for the Greens, and for Latinos. “We were very surprised to learn I was the first Latino board president,” he says, digging through a box of mail. “There have been African-American women who have been board presidents. In fact, five of the last 10 Board of Supervisor presidents have been women. So there had been diversity in other ways. But in a state and a city that has such a large Latino population, we were surprised.”

From the stack of letters, he pulls correspondence informing him that there was some precedent to his election: A member of the Progressive wing of the Republican Party was elected as San Francisco’s board president in the ’30s. This pleases Gonzalez, primarily because the board member was affiliated with former California Governor and Progressive Party founder Hiram Johnson. Gonzalez sees Johnson an example of a leader who promoted the “good government” movement, a service-oriented bent that he admires and continues to follow.

Gonzalez himself worked for nearly a decade as a public defender before winning a four-year term on San Francisco’s board, and it’s that service background Gonzalez hopes to capitalize on as he promotes his top agenda item: putting a citywide minimum wage measure on the ballot in November. He understands it’s a high hurdle to clear, but he has a few things in his favor, including the existence of an already established living wage law. Passed by the board in 2000, the “minimum compensation” law requires city service contractors, including nonprofit agencies and leaseholders at San Francisco International Airport, to pay workers at least $10.25 an hour.

To establish a minimum wage of somewhere between $8.25 and $8.75 per hour for workers in the city, Gonzalez is counting on alliances between progressives and the city’s business organizations—two groups that have not always joined forces in the past. Yet he may be able to build such a coalition, considering that similarly strange allies thrust Gonzalez into his leadership position.

In a town that has long been run by Democrats like Mayor Willie Brown, and on an 11-member board with nine Democrats, his chance to win the presidency against two Democrats seemed slim, at best. But for some of the more independent-minded members of the board, it was precisely Gonzalez’s distance from the Democratic machine that made him an attractive board president. He won January’s election by a 6 to 5 margin.

Gonzalez, a Texas native and Stanford law grad, represents the city’s District 5, a large portion of which covers the Haight-Ashbury neighborhood. Though hardly the counterculture mecca of ’60s legend, Haight-Ashbury remains a wildly diverse neighborhood, home to long-time merchants, older property owners, twenty-something kids from the suburbs and a considerable contingent of homeless teens. Gonzalez has these residents in mind when discussing the minimum wage law and other aspects of his agenda, including improving the city’s homeless assistance programs.

With such plans, gaining national recognition is not high on Gonzalez’s list. That’s perfectly fine with party organizers such as Ross Mirkarimi, a founder of California’s Green Party. “Though these kinds of local offices are considered non-partisan, this is the bread and butter of the Green Party’s progress,” Mirkarimi says. “Sustaining and occupying as many seats as possible, and parlaying those into the partisan arena.”

In addition, he says, gaining those offices provides a challenge for the Greens. “The burden of proof is on us to show we can govern too.”

Gonzalez agrees. “I think the Greens are best served if, after my tenure, people look back and say, ‘He worked on fundamental issues, and he kept his focus.’”
  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Mr Schaeffer unwittingly makes the case that Greens and all liberals, such as San Francisco’s board member Matt Gonzalez,  fail at governing because of an unwillingness to grasp or admit simple tried and true concepts like the law of supply and demand.  Mr Gonzalez’ idea of increasing the minimum wage to 8.25-8.75 throughout the city of San Francisco will drive employers out of the city.  Denver several years ago raised the minimum wage in the city to 7.50 The result now is that the Denver leaders are trying to increase public transportation from the urban core to the suburbs to transport all the service workers   to their jobs as new business have located outside the municipal boundary and existing ones have moved.  San Francisco is in for the same increase in urban to suburban commuting as entrepreneurs choose the cheaper labor costs of the ring over the core.  Those such as Mr Gonzalez and Mr Shaeffer who refuse to accept or recognize such common logic continue to marginalize themselves in increasingly conservative America.

    Posted by Carl Snodgrass on Feb 26, 2003 at 5:50 AM

    Matt is an inspiration to everyone in San Francisco who believes in social justice and integrity.  He is a model for the honest politician.  Contrary to the previous comment, Matt’s point is this: businesses move out of a city after the city has burned all it’s money on tax breaks and perks for big business, leaving the residents with a city they no longer want, or can afford, to live in. The residents leave, and then finding employees becomes too difficult for these companies, so they move on to suck the next city dry.

    Posted by Paul Platt on Feb 26, 2003 at 8:21 PM

    The ascension of Matt Gonzalez to Board President in this city dominated by the Willie Brown Democrat Machine was a miracle, and definitely the best thing to happen to San Francisco in years.  Many people have many opinions on why Matt was chosen for this honor by his colleagues, but one simple fact explains the mystery:  Matt knows how to work with people.  His skills at negotiation and thorough understanding of the issues important to the city made him the natural choice, transcending the partisan bickering, power-mongering, and petty disputes that all too often gum up the workings of city government.

    Posted by Randy Zurcher on Feb 26, 2003 at 9:38 PM

    Hello Brett,
    I recently discovered this article and thought I would clarify something.  I was probably the person who sent Matt Gonzalez the correspondence about the Progressive Republican precedent.  Franck Roberts Havenner was elected to the SF Board of Supervisors in 1925 as a protege of Hiram Johnson.  At the time, he was indeed a member of the progressive wing of the Republican Party.  However, in 1934, Havenner, who had been reelected continually since his initial election, revived the Progressive Party in California and re-registered as a Progressive.  He did this because of the fear that conservative Republicans would run a candidate against Johnson (who was a U.S. Senator then) and defeat Johnson in the primary.  If that had been the case (it wasn’t), Johnson could re-register with the Progressives and still be in the race.  Havenner stayed with the Progressives for the next few years.  In 1935, he ran for president of the Board of Supervisors, and, like Matt, won with a bare majority despite the fact that he belonged to a third party.  I read somewhere that Matt remarked, “This wasn’t supposed to happen,” after his victory, and it was much the same for Havenner.  In 1936 he then ran for Congress as a Roosevelt New Dealer.  He got the endorsement of the Democratic County Central Committee (despite the fact that there was a Democratic candidate running) and defeated the popular incumbent, Republican Florence Kahn.  In 1939, Havenner switched to the Democratic Party.  There’s more, but I wanted you to see the parallels between this third-party fellow and Matt.
    Sue Vaughan

    Posted by susan vaughan on Mar 23, 2003 at 7:58 AM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Help this website survive! Donate to In These Times now!