In These Times is not immune to the Great Recession. Please donate now!
PrintDiscuss
Features » April 13, 2005

The Blogosphere: Insiders vs. Outsiders

By Digby

What most journalists and others who observe the new phenomenon of political blogging fail to understand is that the “blogosphere” is actually two rather sharply distinct spheres.
Tags   

It shouldn’t have come as too much of a surprise when Time named the right-wing blog PowerLine “Blog of the Year” in December 2004. After all, PowerLine had been widely read by the mainstream media because of its role in a big journalism story—the Dan Rather “Memogate” affair.

In the days after the infamous September 8, 2004 broadcast, PowerLine was among the first to point out the anomalies in the alleged National Guard memos. The notoriety stuck, although a later investigation by the Columbia Journalism Review revealed that the PowerLine bloggers—as well as others who gained national media attention, like Buckhead from Free Republic and Charles Johnson of LittleGreenFootballs—were uniformly wrong as to the details, and only right in the larger sense that the memos could not be authenticated.

Nonetheless, from that point on, the right-wing blogosphere became the go-to place for nifty blog stories, leaving the less-celebrated lefty blogs largely ignored by the mainstream media.

What most journalists and others who observe the new phenomenon of political blogging fail to understand is that the “blogosphere” is actually two rather sharply distinct spheres. These roughly mirror the country’s political divide and are organized in very different ways.

The right blogosphere operates largely as part of the greater Republican message machine. Many of its bloggers are already part of that infrastructure, working as journalists for conservative publications, writing books and lecturing. Independent bloggers on the right hail from all walks of life, but the leading voices are either part of the political machine itself, like Mike Krempasky of RedState, or closely connected to the conservative media and think tank infrastructure, like Hugh Hewitt, Michelle Malkin and the PowerLine bloggers. The right blogosphere is a reflection of successful top-down Republican message control, and as such these bloggers are welcomed warmly into the fold.

As Garance Franke-Ruta writes in the April issue of The American Prospect, the right-wing blogosphere has also recently become useful to long-established political operatives such as Morton Blackwell, mentor to iconic GOP campaign strategists Karl Rove and Lee Atwater. In the recent Eason Jordan affair, the right blogosphere was credited with forcing the former chief news executive of CNN to resign over a controversial off-the-record comment. It turned out that many conservative blogs were part of this larger concerted effort. In the wake of this success, conservatives are now running what Franke-Ruta describes as “Internet Activist Schools, designed to teach conservatives how to engage in guerilla Internet activism,” or what some people used to call “dirty tricks.”

By contrast, the left blogosphere is populated by “citizen bloggers,” who work in non-political occupations for a living and blog for reasons of personal interest. This sphere actually operates as a unique and potentially powerful political constituency rather than a part of the Democratic Party apparatus. Unlike their counterparts on the right, the lefty blogs have had to crash the party, but because they did it with energy, votes and money, they are making themselves a power in their own right.

In the last election cycle the “netroots” exerted their influence through prodigious fundraising, contributing greatly to the Democrats’ fundraising efforts. Howard Dean’s primary campaign also demonstrated that the Internet was a rich source of small individual donations that collectively added up to many millions. But throughout the campaign, blogs such as Daily Kos and Eschaton were able to raise the six figure sums that normally only fat cats like Bush “Pioneers” could generate. And along with that money came a large group of engaged and informed netroot activists who were able, in the weeks leading up to the election, to marshal a boycott of national advertisers virtually overnight to protest Sinclair Broadcasting’s plan to air a blatantly partisan documentary about John Kerry. That action led to a precipitous downgrading of Sinclair stock, enough to cause the company to abandon its plans.

Lefty blogs also spend a lot of time discussing various ways for the party to hone its political message in the hopes that these ideas will percolate up from the blogosphere and gain the attention of the powers that be. They have found that through the amplification of many blogs linking to certain themes and concepts over time, good ideas rise to the attention of those who have the power to put them to work in the mainstream media.

Because of these sucesses, some progressives believed that the recent efforts by Republican members of the Federal Election Commission’s (FEC) to regulate blogs as paid political speech may have been motivated by partisanship. As it turns out, the new proposed FEC rule changes, still subject to public comment, continue to exempt blogs from regulation.

With all of the potential for fundraising, “guerilla activism” and massaging, perhaps neither party wants to unduly inhibit their sector of the blogosphere.

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Digby is a pseudonym used by the blogger who writes at “Hullabaloo,”.

More information about Digby
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Propaganda needs to have no traceable source for it to be truly effective.It would appear the far-right has found another way to spread deceit and further their politics of avarice.Thanks for perverting another medium.

    Posted by wwoods on Apr 13, 2005 at 12:33 PM

    Digby, thanks for rewriting the Prospect piece. Unfortunately, the only bit you actually added was completely, utterly, bass-ackwards wrong. Cheers.

    Posted by Mike Krempasky on Apr 13, 2005 at 6:05 PM

    I think you really have to try hard to miss the difference between the right and left blogs.

    The blogs of the right are largly looking out from the Republican party message to expand that message.  The blogs of the left are largely looking in at changing the Democrat party message.  As a result, conclusions such as this article are missing the obvious.

    Consider also the party in power.  Blogs of the right can largely act in comfort due to the Republican control of the Executive, Senate and House.  Blogs of the left are inclined to make amends to change that Republican control.

    This observation isn’t complex.  It is not like searching for a tree that provides no shade.

    Posted by Brennan Stout on Apr 13, 2005 at 6:27 PM

    The big left blogs are screwed up too.  There is no room whatsoever for real discussion outside the range of really liberal to moderately liberal.  ON Daily Kos for example they completely cut off anyone who is not a liberal.  Anyone who challenges capitalism, or is anti-statist or seems too far left is literally blocked from posting comments and diaries on Kos.  I was blocked from Kos for my view that every country on earth is ruled by a tiny ruling class and that winning elections can’t change that fact.  I also said I was neither a liberal nor a Democrat.  For that I was banned.  This is a screwed up mindset.

    Posted by Maximillian Al Dakari on Apr 13, 2005 at 6:30 PM

    Indeed, Digby, bravo on mastering the art of the paraphrase in mere weeks.  I’m sure Garance didn’t mind doing the heavy lifting here, such as it was.

    Posted by Tacitus on Apr 13, 2005 at 7:05 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 159 posts.

Appeared in the July 2009 Issue
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS