Interesting piece. Somehow, it's more annoying when a company that trades on its fairness to its workers as part of its branding is caught union-busting, using very young girls in its marketing, etc. The marketing message of American Apparel must be backed up with a genuinely progressive approach to their workers if it isn't to be an exercise in hypocrisy.
All 12 comments by...
kingfelix
-
-
"Please let me know if I am missing something." Only the facts have eluded you so far.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
"As for the sexual harassment lawsuits, well, they’re just lawsuits, years away from being disposed of. The fact that AA has not agreed to quietly settle these cases out of court is sort of telling. But so far the only person being transparent is Charney. I wonder how the defendants’ lives are going to hold up to similar public scrutiny. But then again, it seems no one cares - there’s a witch hunt atmosphere in the air and everyone is out for blood. No one is digging deeper and looking at all the facts." okay. well, this passage is misogynistic. your …
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
Ha ha. Big words. Well, I picked up on your paragraph as it was full of wild speculation. I refer you to it again, "As for the sexual harassment lawsuits, well, they’re just lawsuits, years away from being disposed of. The fact that AA has not agreed to quietly settle these cases out of court is sort of telling. But so far the only person being transparent is Charney. I wonder how the defendants’ lives are going to hold up to similar public scrutiny. But then again, it seems no one cares - there’s a witch hunt atmosphere in the air …
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
"big words devoid of meaning" please supply a list of words without meaning, you seem to have made a philosophical breakthrough.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
can't you see the big picture, that your inane speculations show you have a specific angle on the article that casts doubt on the veracity of the few facts you provide. the point is - how much credence can your facts be given when all your speculations and insinuations seek to apologise for AA's behaviour, both in its business and in the specific charges laid against Charney. i am not illiterate or disingenuous, but keep going with your big words.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
it's also quite clear that you are not omniscient. you are almost the polar opposite of such a state, and relax, i don't think anyone will be moved to accuse you of omniscience anytime soon. not on this evidence.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
you do not provide balance by being an apologist. i've brought more to the table than your lamentable efforts. i'm going to put my fingers against my head now and pretend you never happened. i imagine your parents have often tried the same thing.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
accusing me of projecting is childish. i have given your post some analysis. my own thoughts on AA are not powerful enough for me to be projecting. childish.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
i hope your hat comes alive and chokes you to death, slowly.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
you are apologising. it's their in your comments, in your insinuation, see earlier post. you are apologising and explaining away. FACT, remember.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
-
and you just can't stop taking the bait. you are obviously a cretin who needs the last word. have it to yourself, cos i'm gone. good luck with life, you're going to need it.
Posted to Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
- Joined August 5, 2005
- Last Visit August 7, 2005
- URL
Other Profiles
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Ignoring Outrage, Obama Set to Expand Pentagon Presence in Colombia
- 9.
- 10.
RSS Feed