I'm so going to love it when we succeed and most of you losers keep on jawing about what could have been - a failed Iraqi state and with it a failed Bush Presidency. You guys are screwed, Al Qaeda is no longer welcome in Iraq to say the least, the Sunni tribes are starting to turn on them en masse. Maliki is turning out to be very non-sectarian in his dealings with irredeemable militias and is beginning to find common ground with the Sunni tribes. The tide is going out and with it the political prospects for you losers. …
All 48 comments by...
Hyjinx22
-
-
Personally, I can't wait until they start having tribunals and executing these people. Then we won't have to worry about their detention.
Posted to 8 Reasons to Close Guantnamo Now
-
Better yet, lets stop taking prisoners. No need for Gitmos then.
Posted to 8 Reasons to Close Guantnamo Now
-
Oh, look at that, it appears that terrorism wasn't a figment of George Bush's imagination afterall! http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061110/ts_nm/security_britain_dc Tolerant old Britain, tracking at least 30 jihadist plots on their own soil, that religion of peace is hard at work indeed. But, but you'll stammer, "George Bush made the terrorists angry!" Well, not only are they angry now, but they're real damn happy that the democrats are in power. http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyid=2006-11-10T140135Z_01_L10266591_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-ELECTIONS-IRAN.xml&src=rss&rpc=22 http://cbs4boston.com/topstories/topstories_story_314120450.html http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52747 So, when will Jimmah Carter head to the ME to negotiate our surrender? When will that tub of traitorous lard Murtha "redeploy" us to Okinawa and give this scum exactly what …
Posted to What Did the Voters Say?
-
Oh, Dems - Muqtada Al Sadr doesn't want you to forget your campaign promises to pull us out of Iraq! "The vote shows the Iraqi and American people are of one mind about withdrawing U.S. troops. ... We hope the Democrats don't forget their campaign promises.'" "If they don't, we will deal with them in a brotherly way once the last American soldier pulls out from Iraq." HELLO?! THIS IS THE SAME PERSON RUNNING SHIA DEATH SQUADS! How did it come to be that the Dem message is also the hope and dream of jihadis everywhere? I think we all know …
Posted to What Did the Voters Say?
-
Harm to the economic interests of most Americans?! What kind of crack is the author of this article smoking? What the hell is 4.4% unemployment?! Doesn't that mean the vast majority of people have jobs?! DOW over 12,000, the "little people's" (your elitist view of individuals) 401ks and S&Ps booming! Corporate profits being re-invested in more job creation. The "workin' man" (only seems to apply to unionites in your parlance) is fat, happy and lazy as ever. I just cannot believe the propaganda you people try to sell everyone else and yourselves. The tax cuts were instrumental in maintaining this level …
Posted to What Did the Voters Say?
-
The only thing scary about this election is the number of high-ranking Jihad leaders that very much want the Democrats in power. This interview piece of Jihadists at the World Net Daily is simply astounding - http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52747 Yes this site might lean conservative, but these are the words of the terrorists themselves. So, answer me this. If Bush's policies were "creating terrorists" and otherwise furthering their cause, why wouldn't the terrorists want to keep with success and endorse Republican policy of staying in Iraq? Why would they want Democrats in power? Having such evil people so clearly endorse one political party …
Posted to Fear and Voting in the USA
-
blondemike - There is a link in my previous post to the article, copy and paste into the address bar of your web browser. Very scary, that is a sad statement indeed.
Posted to Fear and Voting in the USA
-
How the hell are we "creating terrorists?" I think in Afghan and Iraq we are doing what all you libs always carp about, addressing the "root causes." That being rampant injustice, both legal and social in the Arab world by trying to institute representative government and looking forward to a better day. We have to overcome millenia of religious problems in the Arab world, where the teachings of Islam are so intolerant to others it will take a long time. We have win in Iraq and Afghan by all means nessary so we can create the conditions for Arabs to question …
Posted to Fear and Voting in the USA
-
blondemike - Seems I struck a nerve. I'm glad you are honest though, unlike the people that lead your party. At least you admit openly you desire defeat. If we do lose, I hope the Jihadist behead your stupid ass first.
Posted to Fear and Voting in the USA
-
blondemike - Well, it appears you like the number 30 million. So, every witch had a black cat I suppose. You might also suppose that their were plenty of non-black cats that escaped Christian clutches who may have been able to eat all those damn rats. Christianity is not without its sins, and I do not wish to see them repeated. The Reformation (Council of Trent) was instrumental in moving us beyond the Dark Ages and into the Renaissance, I advocate the same for Islam. NOTE: There is no reason to kill everyone in the Middle East, and that is certainly …
Posted to Fear and Voting in the USA
-
The only thing scarey about this election is the number of high-ranking Jihad leaders that very much want the Democrats in power. This interview piece of Jihadists at the World Net Daily is simply astounding - http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52747 Yes this site might lean conservative, but these are the words of the terrorists themselves. So, answer me this. If Bush’s policies were “creating terrorists” and otherwise furthering their cause, why wouldn’t the terrorists want to keep with success and endorse Republican policy of staying in Iraq? Why would they want Democrats in power? Having such evil people so clearly endorse one political party …
Posted to Dueling Democrats
-
The Iranians tried to send a cargo plane full of more C802 radar-guided missiles to Syria for Hezbollah via Iraqi and Turkish airspace shortly after hostilities commenced in July. US intelligence found out 3 days prior, and asked Iraqi and Turkish controllers to deny the cargo plane fly-over rights. This was successful. There is indisputable satellite imagery of the boxes containing the missiles as well as the unpacked launchers. So, who here can explain this in terms of "limited to moral support?" Is this author a complete crackpot, or just a propagandist shill?
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
I'm not too concerned about any of this though. The cease-fire is a joke, France has already surrendered as has the feckless UN force. The IDF will be finishing off these jokers shortly and hopefully coming down hard on their Syrian supply lines. Of course, this would only be treating the symptom of the larger disease and might buy remission for a few years. Until the Arab world has its Council of Trent and decides that certain aspects of the Koran are a little more than incompatible with peaceful co-existance with the rest of the world this war will rage on. …
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
Imran: From what I understand (Zawahiri) Spain is "occupied territory" too. What are the Muslim plans for that? You really think this is all about the Shabaa Farms?! That is just an excuse for the genocide they desire to commit. I agree that the airpower only war was a big mistake on the part of Israel, they needed to go in hard. I'm sure the next round they will be international peace forces will be completely discredited. Go IDF!~
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
Geocopy: Ummm....I have a feeling that the Iranians (regime) declared war on us a long time ago (1979) and that every act of magnamity on our part only makes us seem weaker. Khomeni himself recently told us our "razor is dull" and that we are a "weak horse." Oh ya, geocopy - to your "violence doesn't solve anything" mentality I could cite most of human history to prove you are wrong. Unfortunately, the fact is we are dealing with a regime in Iran that literally believes in a 12th Imam in a well who will emerge at the dawning of the …
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
Geocopy: I take the very long view on these things. I think by sponsoring revolution in Iran we can't lose because there is simply nothing worse than what is there. It is the same as defeating a Hitler because in both cases a deep-seated fascist ideology is at work and once you shatter the illusion (of the "ummah" in this case) you will discredit the ideology. The Japanese were as suicidal as they come during WWII, we literally beat that out of them. We are now very friendly. I prefer that the West not have to go that route. I think …
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
Also, do you know why we didn't "generate enemies" during WWII? It wasn't because people around the world loved us so and wouldn't side with the Nazis, it's because they FEARED us. It is a Machiavellian world, and only when it is clear that resistance is completely useless and will only end in your destruction, humans who are sane will choose not to resist. The West is simply unwilling to instill that kind of fear, which would fill the void of respect. So we suffer perpetual war. I do not believe the people we fight are hydra like and sprout 6 …
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
Spinoza750: Whether those sects of Islamofascists hate each other or not is a moot point. They all work towards the same end: the destruction of Western civilizations beginning with the Jews. That makes them all equally culpable, and don't be so naive to believe they don't cooperate operationally. Wasn't it recently that non-other than UBL's son was "released" from Iran to lead the war for Hizbollah in Lebanon? Wouldn't that be direct Sunni/Shite cooperation? The enemy of my enemy is my friend is always true. Shatter the illusion of the "Ummah" and bury the Nasser ideology of panarabism, that will put …
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
decampe: Thanks for the props. Hang in there man, don't give up the good fight. Someday most of these people will be mugged by reality and hopefully they'll notice!
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
Imran: Oh sure...Hezbollah the big, bad organization to which all powers are impotent. Let me clue you in jackass, if Israel REALLY wanted to get down with them, they would have. Olmert is weak and ineffectual, Bibi would have really "tuned them up." The airpower only approach was a loser from the start against the dug in. What they needed were 30,000 troops, flamethrowers to clear out those little rat holes and many checkpoints south of the Litani. I have absolutely no doubt that it is very doable, especially after cutting off their Syrian supply line. Alas, there will be another …
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
Spinoza750: You are very naive. A Hudna is just a period of false peace for the Arabs to re-arm and regroup after getting smacked around for being reckless. That is completely worthless. Hamas needs to go, there is no room for that organization in any serious Palestinian state. How the hell can you have peace with a group who has it in there charter to EXTERMINATE you?! That is definitely a "tough" negotiating point, wouldn't you say? You can solve the problems of the Palestinians by cutting off all international aide, that way they either have to play ball and build …
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
In general I think the West and Israel have forgotten how to wage war. Who cares how many Shite are involved in Hezbollah? You keep shooting until they stop shooting back, leave it up to them. Whether that results in their entire destruction is then up to them. Again, if the West (which it just did again, today - Europe pledging 500 mil to Hamas) would also just stop sending them aid and force them to reap what they sow, then this whole conflict would have dried up a long time ago. That is the only way, one side simply has …
Posted to Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah
-
I'm sure they'll always be enough money for C4 explosives, AK47s, Katyusha rockets and their homemade Kassams, huh? Who needs food when one can have such joys! Maybe, just maybe the Palis will have to change their spending habits. Could that be the diabolical Zionist plot?! I sure hope so! Peace at last without further bloodshed would be nice.
Posted to The U.S.-Israeli Somalia Plan
-
opeluboy - Hey moonbat, what's up? First off, I'm an American by birth, non-Jewish (Catholic in fact). Actually, the Jews have built themselves quite a sustainable economy, a little too socialistic in some respects for my liking, but not bad non-the-less. We give Israel about $3 bil a year, but their GDP is: $129 bil (CIA fact book). I don't think us withdrawing our funding would exactly break the bank over there. The Palis are far more dependent on the West (which they loathe, but provide approx. 50% of their income) then the Israelis are or will ever be. So, you …
Posted to The U.S.-Israeli Somalia Plan
-
Hey opeluboy - Looks like your buddies in Al Aqsa found enough $$$ for chemical weapons! Duchebag!
Posted to The U.S.-Israeli Somalia Plan
-
Wow, was I right! Props to me! Looks like Hezbollah wanted in on the action too though, left them off my original list (how could I forget the 'A' team?!) Anyone still confused about the intentions of Israel's harmless, powerless (boo-hoo) neighbors? Not anymore! With any luck, Syria and that asshat Ahmadinnerjacket will be next. Go IDF! Free the Lebanese from their Hizbollah hostage situation (too bad Hizbollah won't let the citizens leave the areas where they stage and store their rockets) and bring the long saught after peace to the Middle East. You see people, you cannot negotiate with terrorist …
Posted to The U.S.-Israeli Somalia Plan
-
What is wrong with the Muslim world today and why it is very, very hard to have any respect for them: * Muslims fly commercial airliners into buildings in New York City. No Muslim outrage. * Muslim officials block the exit where school girls are trying to escape a burning building because their faces were exposed. No Muslim outrage. * Muslims cut off the heads of three teenaged girls on their way to school in Indonesia. A Christian school. No Muslim outrage. * Muslims murder teachers trying to teach Muslim children in Iraq. No Muslim outrage. * Muslims murder over 80 …
Posted to The U.S.-Israeli Somalia Plan
-
I have no pity for most recent graduates of our higher ed system (I'm one of them, 2 years out). Most people major in "Literature," "History," pol. science or underwater basket weaving and expect, no DEMAND to find real jobs! You know, when I went to school my life was pretty dull because I majored in Bioinformatics, a very challenging and demanding field with much to learn from computer science & biology. I now have a very good job, amazing! A skill that can be applied! I didn't waste mommy & daddy's money getting a degree in something un-employable, partying with …
Posted to Hey Millennials, Debt Becomes You
-
Unions are unfortunately not a long-term solution either. Just look at how the union has utterly destroyed GM with obligations it simply doesn't have the financial capacity to meet. Or the airlines for that matter. Cradle-to-grave French-like job security and benefits is an insanity, people need to make sure they get paid what they're worth in the now and do their own long-term planning and investing. Unions that over-reach as they inevitably do destroy the very buisnesses that employ them, the greed of the moment offsets the futures of others to come.
Posted to Hey Millennials, Debt Becomes You
-
wedontneedroads - It is an obvious fact that unions are largely responsible for the downfall of GM (the airlines are mis-managed anyway, but the unions def. contribute). How can you operate a business where you pay something on the order of 3X more people full salaries than are actually working at any given time? How can a company compete with non-union shops such as Toyota and Honda when they have that kind of overhead which is inevitably reflected in the price of vehicles? I'm not blaming them for the entire fall of all auto manufacturing, otherwise I would have included Ford …
Posted to Hey Millennials, Debt Becomes You
-
In this article it is mentioned that combined a few red states have 7 more electoral votes than Massachusetts and New York. It goes on to state that these red states have an "unfair" advantage because Mass & NY have a bigger combined population. Do these population counts include non-citizens, i.e. immigrants? The last time I checked, the electoral college must represent citizens, not just gross number of people in some area. I don't see how the electoral college can really be argued against, it is a pretty simple formula. If you have more citizens, you get more votes. Where is …
Posted to Saving Secular Society
-
johnnyincentx I think you miss one of the major aspects of the function the electoral college actually performs. Most people cite the original fear that it wouldn't be a good idea for people to directly elect their executive, but it has a much more pragmatic function. It maintains parity between congressional representation on legislative matters and the power of each state with regard to the executive. Since the number of electoral votes of a state is: # of house reps + 2 (1 for each senator) the number of electoral votes is exactly in sync with what has been decided upon …
Posted to Saving Secular Society
-
txjill - I CHALLENGE you to dispute anything I have written in this thread. I'm sure you don't have the intellectual firepower for that, but try anyway. It might be educational!
Posted to Saving Secular Society
-
johnnyincentx - Awwww....what's a matter Johnny, no direct response to my last post? Talk about someone who is a caricature of themselves, that would be you. I've been nothing but civil here and you nothing but venomous and hateful. I'm sure you are too dim to follow my arguement on the benefits of the electoral college and the design of a Republic. I'm also sure you must recognize the inherent hypocrisy in your positions, but you are a classic ranter and hater - nothing more. Grow up. - Hyjinx22
Posted to Saving Secular Society
-
If the rate of job loss is up as claimed in the article, how is unemployment at an all-time low?
Posted to How Do You Define Security?
-
Ummm...we don't need anymore "labor" protections, we have enough worthless, blood sucking unions for that. Just ask GM.
Posted to How Do You Define Security?
-
brian28 - China is a communist government with a ruthlessly capitalist economy. They have abandoned the idea of state run economy as evidenced by their privatization of their major banks and acceptance of foreign investment into non-state run industries. China is moving towards a hybrid model of communism/capitalism. It is an interesting experiment but the rulers of China are not accounting for something. The development of a middle class that wields real power. When this occurs, the old system will finally collapse and the Maoists who ruthlessly repress large percentages of their own population will finally pay for their crimes. I'm …
Posted to How Do You Define Security?
-
In response to the original article posted about this lawyer allegedly having been visited in the middle of the night by the NSA/FBI/Delta Force/(perhaps the FAB 5?) : You play with international terrorists you run the risk of being burned. I hope the government NEVER have to divulge every single reason that would lead them to investigating someone further, especially if they're dealing with such characters. If we had to lay it all in the open as many of you libs desparately want we will never get anywhere against the extensive Wahhabist organizations that desparately seek our destruction. There is a …
Posted to Undercover Cover-Up
-
Justin - Ummmm... isn't it generally the libs that want us to: 1) Not drill for oil 2) Conserve (I'm sure you can cut back somewhere) 3) Not build refineries because they may be unsightly 4) Endorse tremendous environmental regulations on blends of gasoline and its distribution which makes the refining process much less efficient. 5) Switch to ethanol even though the supply simply wasn't there to meet demand which would inevitably drive up prices. 6) Tax the hell out of oil companies in direct violation of a law of reality: If you want less of something (behavior, product) tax it. …
Posted to Undercover Cover-Up
-
Justin - If you hadn't noticed, I had 2 posts, the 1 prior to yours covered the article, the other responding to your complaint about gas prices. Try READING.
Posted to Undercover Cover-Up
-
Justin - Another thing. I was making the point that your party and the people that usually visit this site (the 'you people') are all for every measure that would curtail our production of gasoline. So, that being the position, you do not have a right to bitch about the price since it is the policies ('you people') support that lead to it.
Posted to Undercover Cover-Up
-
Jon B - Dammit man! READ my original post about THIS article - as usual no attention to detail from the libs... just feeling.
Posted to Undercover Cover-Up
-
Hey all. I'm a conservative for the most part and just stopped in to see how the other side lives. I'm sorry to hear of your constant agony and fret, you live in the greatest country on Earth despite whatever you think about the people in power. I'm sure most of you will have a coniption about that statement, I must be some naive "non-citizen" of the world to think such blasphemy. So cheer up, live life and find some intellectual ground for your arguements beyond "he's a war criminal" or "this is racist" or "I'm oppressed, whoa is me" rhetoric …
Posted to What Ails Us?
-
Epistrophy - I wouldn't be on this site if I were one-dimensional and narrow-minded, I would have just written you people off. I'm trying to understand what makes you people believe the way you do. I always listen to the arguements of others, I'm actually a scientist by trade and that is part and parcel of science. I'm just completely bored with the incessant liberal attacks on the actions of others and the "pie in the sky" unrealism that liberal "solutions" embody. Whatever happened to JFK Democrats, they were so much more reasonable people, but I digress... I'm just as much …
Posted to What Ails Us?
-
Dignitatum - The only thing driving presidential poll numbers is the price of gasoline. The correlation is so strong it is absurd, you can actually translate pennies and dimes into approval percentage points. This has been mostly true since the seventies. It seems that since there is a continuous distribution of marginal utilities for gasoline, price change will inevitable expand the margins and make people feel "squeezed" despite all other economic indicators. This inevitable shifts people between approval and disapproval. I guess the gas shortages of the 70s were that traumatic and became forever tied to an economic indicator of "well-being." …
Posted to What Ails Us?
-
You know, the point is being missed. If Iran acquires nuclear weapons, they will use it as a shield to ramp up conventional terrorist strikes on us all. The grand "international community [pronounced with a French accent]" will not be able to do a damned thing then, we will be at their mercy. I think the very detailed nuclear warhead design contained on a laptop smuggled out by Iranian dissidents to the IAEA is proof enough of their intent. It is not a question of if, just a question of can we hit'em hard enough to decapitate the regime and end …
Posted to Do you think the U.S. will go to war with Iran?
-
Jay Cline - You should balance some of that lib diet with a little National Review and Weekly Standard....
Posted to A Primary Concern
- Joined May 6, 2006
- Last Visit February 15, 2007
Other Profiles
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Ignoring Outrage, Obama Set to Expand Pentagon Presence in Colombia
- 9.
- 10.
RSS Feed