e) Hillary won NH because the vote was erroneous or fraudulent. Yeah ... I am leaning towards 'e' for my answer. Voting clerks making errors and machines eating ballots. Anomalies when the machine count is compared to the hand count. Machines and people being susceptible to error and fraud. Given that most politicians are professional liars and/or pigs at the trough. And that there is little difference between either of your political parties ... it's a wonder Americans bother to vote at all. Maybe it's time to start from scratch because the current system is fixed and broken …
All 307 comments by...
David in Canuckistan
-
-
You are what you eat. Dis-moi ce que tu manges, je te dirai ce que tu es. (Tell me what you eat and I will tell you what you are.) - Anthelme Brillat-Savarin Der Mensch ist, was er isst. (The man is what he eats) - Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach And truer words, metaphorically speaking, were never spoken. Genetically modified? Cloned? Bad enough that they make these frankenfoods and worse yet that they won't tell if you are eating them. Simple foods. Raw foods. Whole foods. Good foods! If possible - eat food you have grown or raised …
Posted to Recipe For Disaster
-
Don’t eat so much. - Good advice, Kuya. Anyone who wants to try it might consider fasting for 2 or 3 days and then start eating again (hopefully good food) . They will find that the food tastes incredible and their stomach simply can't hold as much as it used to.
Posted to Recipe For Disaster
-
Way Past, I am considering the possibility that you are a troll who is pretending to be a blood thirsty gun owner because with your statements like "I may need my handguns to kill "LIberals" some day. That is all I care about. " you are doing an excellent smear job making gun owners (and conservatives) look bad.
Posted to Let's Pry Open Those Cold, Dead Hands
-
Way Past, I took some time to read some of your essays on your website and had a few good laughs (with you - not at you). And I agree with much of what you have to say regarding natural rights. But when you start talking about hunting and killing liberals I feel that you are detracting from what could be a good message. So you shouldn't be surprised if people dismiss you as a blood thirsty gun nut (with an unhealthy obsession with liberals) considering some of the statements you make. I might be willing to …
Posted to Let's Pry Open Those Cold, Dead Hands
-
Nah, it's not blasphemous. God likes a good laugh too.
Posted to Holy Toyland
-
Wolf, America is becoming a fascist state. That is scarier than specious allegations of Iran having or seeking to aquire nuclear weapons. And what about the crazies that rule your country who are wreaking havoc in Iraq with nuclear wepaons in the form of depleted uranium weapons? And the same crazies are threatening Iran with nuclear attack. Incredible hubris and a fine example of the pot calling the kettle black. How sad it is that your self perception of cultural superiority seems to prevent you from appreciating the wealth and knowledge of other countries and cultures. I …
Posted to Another War We Can't Afford
-
Whattheheck, what about America's attempt to gain empire ? Are you really that blind that you can't see that the enemy is us (you)? What about the radicals in your own government who seem to be hell bent on attacking Iran just as Iraq was attacked without legitimate cause? Why is your solution dependant on a military threat ? Isn't there a better way?
Posted to Another War We Can't Afford
-
As for the article ... "Another War We Can’t Afford" That's for sure. Economically and more importantly morally. Unless being both economically and morally bankrupt is the intention. Army Gen. David Petraeus - “you can’t win in Iraq … just in Iraq.” A victory in Iraq necessitates “greater involvement with respect to some of the neighboring countries, some of the source countries for foreign fighters. … And it certainly involves Iran.” Senator Joe Lieberman - “the Iranian government by its actions has declared war on us,” President Bush - accusing Iran of putting the Middle East “under …
Posted to Another War We Can't Afford
-
Wolf, type "fascism america" into your favorite search engine and do some reading. Here are a couple examples: 14 points of fascism The Dawning of Fascism in America It's a reality and brushing it off as simply rhetoric with little substance is cowardly or ignorant. You say Iran has made it clear they want nukes . Assuming you mean nuclear weapons ... do you have any evidence for this assertion? Currently Iran insists they are pursuing peaceful nuclear technology and the IAEA backs this up. Any allegations from the United States about Iran attempting to develop …
Posted to Another War We Can't Afford
-
Whattheheck, sorry that I overlooked your reply and please forgive the lateness of my counter-reply. "Love your enemies? Turn the other cheek?" Yes ... and do unto others as you would have them do unto you. "Would you do away with the RCMP?" No. The RCMP did not invade and occupy Iraq and is not threatening Iran with the same. "Check out history - without enforcement civilization would disintegrate. Who, how and to what degree is debatable, but not IF. " I am watching civilization in Iraq disintegrate and the USA is primarily responsible for it. Who will enforce …
Posted to Another War We Can't Afford
-
Aunty, you state " Nuclear weapons are the only ones we respect, and since President Bushllit's invasion of Iraq the Iranians have been trying to build one. Note: since the invasion of Iraq the Iranians have been trying to build one. " I will ask you the same question I asked Wolf when he made a similar statement that alleged the Iranians are building nuclear weapons. Where is the evidence for your allegation? Did President Bush say so? Here is an example of evidence that refutes your allegation:
"A recent House of Representatives committee report on Iran's nuclear capability …
Posted to Another War We Can't Afford
-
Whattheheck, That's good to know because it's always better if two people at odds reason together rather than one reaching for a weapon to settle the argument regardless of the merit of their position. As for your hypothetical situation I can't provide an absolute answer but I would do everything I could to avoid violence simply because I feel it is more harmful to myself to inflict harm on others regardless of their actions. Hard to grasp but it's the way I feel. Planes crash - no detonation. Yes, but radioactive materials scattered over land is not something to brush …
Posted to Another War We Can't Afford
-
Recursive Prophet, good to see you too. Not many leaves or olives left on the branch but I persevere.
Posted to Another War We Can't Afford
-
I am pro-life (but am pro-choice for much the same reasons Aunty mentioned). I am a believer (I will believe what I will to believe) too and the Bible does not specifically forbid abortion and does not treat the loss of a fetus the same as the death of a living person (ie. tooth for tooth and eye for eye).
If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the …
Posted to Not By Spin Alone
-
Aunty, you said The far- right uses abortion to create division and I agree but isn't it also true that the far-left uses similar tactics? And isn't the whole left versus right mindset that so many people subscribe to creating division as well? As well you say right-wingers love to punish. Especially, they love to punish those who can't defend themselves and once again I would agree but with the caveat that unborn children can't defend themselves (as many people on the pro-life side of the abortion debate are so fond of pointing …
Posted to Not By Spin Alone
-
NAFTA, et al sucks. The Green Party, up here in Canada, is for withdrawing from (or possibly renegotiating) NAFTA. They would (and do) get my vote on that policy alone (as well as for many other worthy ideas).
Posted to Making Trade Work for Everyone
-
Whattheheck, what do you think of Congressman (and possible presidential candidate) Ron Paul ?
Posted to Making Trade Work for Everyone
-
Nothing to say anyone? Nuclear boogeyman got your tongues? Scary stuff, eh?
Posted to How worried are you about current nuclear developments?
-
Cosby, welcome. Great posts! I have been saying much the same for years. It's good to see someone else willing to speak out about the American saber rattling at Iran. You said "Osama Bin Laden would love to have Bush's body count ." and in a way he does. Or at least gains some advantage from it. It's a win win situtation for anyone who believes that violence solves problems. Whattheheck, when you say ..."I can't refute the idea that a lot of countries have a low opinion of the U.S. and not totally without cause. However, I don't agree that …
Posted to Duck and Cover
-
Iams712, your last two posts here show a lack of respect. Please remember that we are all guests of ITT at their forums and they have asked us to be respectful in our comments.
Posted to Abuses Alleged During Immigration Raid
-
I don't think it is so much a loaded question as it is loaded answers. And certainly getting more humorous! But the answers we choose are no less true.
Posted to What do you think of the U.S. attorney scandal?
-
Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt. Thank you Mr. Vonnegut.
Posted to Thank You Mr. Vonnegut
-
Whattheheck, gardens are beautiful. I hope you don't mind me thanking Luminous Beauty for the gift Posted by luminous beauty on Apr 18, 2007 at 6:25 AM . Luminous Beauty, thanks. It was bitter and sweet. But mostly sweet!
Posted to Global Warming: Dim Bulbs, Bright Lights
-
The use of depleted uranium is a war crime. Plain and simple. Tex, your callous attitude towards people in the Middle East, exemplified by your derogatory use of the word Haji which in proper usage is a term of respect, is LOATHSOME. Remember ... blessed are the peacemakers.
Posted to Uncle Sam Wants Sustainability
-
Mike - Major was simply quoting from the text of the article to answer Cabbie's question "What does that have to do with the Israeli refusniks?" Major - that's a lot of light bulbs!
Posted to An Israeli Refuseniks Good Fight
-
"... peak oil ... haven't found a reason not to believe ..." Healthy skepticism. I am not saying "peak oil" is a scam. But it could be. And, real or not, it could be used to manipulate us ... to war, to conservation or to development of alternative energy sources. If I were a betting man my money would be on the (red) horse of war. Sadly. Keep in mind that scarcity, even a manipulated artificial scarcity , means higher prices and higher profits. The consequences of "peak oil", such as resource wars, may be in our future but it may …
Posted to Resisting the War on Science
-
Exactly what is "quite unlikely" ? The oil sands up here are a booming business. They extract more now than they used to and are making plans to extract more in the future. bitumen reserve largely untapped (pdf file) -- "Bitumen production in Alberta has increased by 59 per cent (143 million barrels) annually since 2000." trillion barrel tar pit -- "Alberta sits atop the biggest petroleum deposit outside the Arabian peninsula - as many as 300 billion recoverable barrels and another trillion-plus barrels that could one day be within reach using new retrieval methods." "(unless you think …
Posted to Resisting the War on Science
-
Sceneshistoriques, I think I see the problem you have with that portion of my statement. My apologies for the misunderstanding. I wrote "... deposits of oil sands that are recoverable at prices quite a bit lower than current oil prices." Oops - that could sound like I am saying it costs less to recover and my correction is ... deposits of oil sands that are recoverable and profitable at prices quite a bit lower than current oil prices. Still clumsy so let me explain what I mean. When oil was selling for under $ 30 per barrel it …
Posted to Resisting the War on Science
-
Scenehistoriques, I clarified my statement at Posted by David in Canuckistan on Apr 19, 2007 at 9:19 PM . It was not my intention to say that the costs of recovering oil from sands is less than drilling to conventional oilfields. Again my apologies for the confusion. Canada is in the top 10 of oil producing countries and including the oil sands has the second largest reserves. The development of the oil sands production has only begun fairly recently and is gaining momentum. Jon B, lots of industries in Canada get tax breaks for a variety of reasons and the …
Posted to Resisting the War on Science
-
Kuya, lots of room up here in Canuckistan. There is an vacant igloo just beyond the big snowdrift that you could move into. It would be great to have you as a neighbour and we could use your help when we start clearing the snow and planting the orange tree groves.
Posted to Resisting the War on Science
-
You bet! My grandpa told stories of how when he was young he was the best gopher catcher in his village back in the Ukraine. His family would eat the meat and save the skins to make winter coats. Seriously.
Posted to Resisting the War on Science
-
Hi Natalie! How are you? Still selling (or buying?) snake oil? "kidnapped British soldiers that were clearly NOT in their waters, and are now proceeding to parade them for the cameras " They were detained, not kidnapped. Otherwise Guantanamo is full of kidnapping victims. Yes? I would also remind you that CNN (and others) have shown video of 'detainees' on parade as well. And whose water it is has NOT been proven to my satisfaction. For instance ...
"The Iran/Iraq maritime boundary shown on the British government map does not exist. It has been drawn up by the British …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
"they kidnapped British soldiers that were clearly NOT in their waters" So ... we agree that they have detained the British soldiers that were clearly in waters whose boundaries are disputed ? Yes? Much better, Natalie, thanks for the clarification. I did not say that they were violating the treaty. And I did not say "you" did ... I ... (that's me) ... stated that they were not violating the treaty. Come on, Natalie, you can do better than that! And your attempts to make it appear my words supported the actions of the Iranian …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Natalie, please don't support the warmongering of your nation. Please ... for the good of your soul! What's your opinion on the Iraq war these days, Natalie? Is there a war you don't like? Do the good guys always win? Will they have stars on their bellies or no? Are you a Yook or a Zook? Do you butter your bread butter-side up or butter it butter-side down?
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Hi Natalie, I am happy to see you agree that whose water it is does not seem to be so clear as you first asserted. And yes I would agree that it is possible that the Iranian government's detention of these British soldiers is a violation of international law. (Now the US/UK invasion of Iraq ... that was a violation of international law. Yes? Was it a wise war? And in retrospect?) I did not reproduce your sentence out of context, Natalie. Perhaps I added to the context by pointing out a point …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Consider the treatment the British sailors and marines are receiving. Note the smiling faces and relaxed atmosphere with food and flowers and compare it to the way detainees are treated at Abu Ghraib Prison and Guantanamo Detainment Camp.
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
I guess that would make sense if ... Treating people with respect and dignity always makes sense. But the point was really just how unbiased and independent ... I agree that the Iranian media is biased but I see the same bias from the media of any country. For example, if CNN (or BBC) was less biased perhaps instead of repeating ad nauseum Tony Blair's assertion that "they were in Iraqi waters" perhaps they could report that the waters are disputed. Instead of repeating ad nauseum that the soldiers were "under a UN mandate" they could report that the mandate does …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
I retract the word same and extend the word different . So my words should read "a different bias" . Thanks for the correction, Natalie.
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
What is fabricated and state dictated , Natalie? What is sufficiently descriptive ? What is context ? The smiles (and smirks) on their faces? Do you think after the photo opportunity that the evil Iranians took that bowl of fruit (I saw the bananas!) on the table and tortured the detainees in horrible and terrible ways?
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
This morning I was watching CNN (it does suck) and they announced that the 15 British sailors and marines are being released.
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Arpie, although I respect your opinion I must disagree. Natalie has as much right to participate in these discussions as anyone. If nothing else her commentary provides a contrast by which we develop and improve our own commentary. So, you see, having a discussion with Natalie does help me attain new insights and ideas. Beyond that ... Natalie and I are old friends. If I ignored her I am afraid her feelings might be hurt. And out of my concern for her, and others like her, I feel compelled to encourage them to overcome a lifetime of patriotically pathologic …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
"I never said or insinuated that Natalie didn't have the right to participate here." "Show me where I said she shouldn't be allowed or didnt have the right to post here?" Arpie, maybe its just semantics then; "This will be my last reply on this or other topics to you [Nat], and I would strongly recommend other users here follow suit." Sounds to me like you are trying to deny her participation by boycotting any dialogue with her and encouraging others to the same (much the same way that the USA treats Iran). Technically not denying the right to comment here …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
“I have made a ceaseless effort not to ridicule, not to bewail, not to scorn human actions, but to understand them” -- Baruch de Spinoza
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
"Thanks David, you are truly a nice guy, although I don't think the leadership in Iran deserves as much benefit of the doubt as you think they do." Thank you, Natalie. I think that everyone deserves the benfit of the doubt until all doubt is removed. And even then there is mercy for mistakes and forgiveness for faults. "confronting them; as I said before-go for it. Not me. I will engage you and LB on issues of faith, but I am no longer willing to give Jehovah's Witnesses any of my limited time. Get the connection?-Arpie" Arpie, that's funny because I …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
My way of joking is to tell the truth. That's the funniest joke in the world. -- Muhammad Ali
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
I know David has since realized it was all nonsense, and I suspect others have as well. I also hope David has realized that the treatment the British hostages recieved was anything but accurately portrayed by state-run Iranian TV. Yes, Natalie. The official government approved story of what happened on 9/11 is quite likely nonsense. No, Natalie. The treatment of the British detainees as portrayed on Iranian television was mostly accurate.
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Yes, Natalie, you did misinterpret my statement. As I said ... a healthy touch of paranoia - defined as a suspicion of the motives of others. Well deserved skepticism. "And on exactly what basis do you come to your conclusion that the British hostages were somehow telling the truth while in captivity, and lying after they got safely home???" Detainees. But this question isn't exactly what you mentioned earlier ... "... the treatment the British hostages recieved ..." ... was what I was responding to in your previous post. Not the so called confessions the British soldiers were coerced …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Natalie, enough games. I still harbor doubts about all of the theories presented for what happened on 9/11 and have made no absolute judgements or claims of knowing the truth of the matter is. I have answered the same in different ways to your similar questions on previous occasions. My previous statement shouldn't have read "was" but should correctly read "is" . Thanks for the correction. We should put this topic away now, Natalie, as I think you have become obsessed with it. Here is a story for you ...
Obsessed Two traveling monks reached a river where …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
"Your continued confusion on the matter reflects extremely poorly on you, and I would urge you to wise up ... " Awww, Natalie, your ridicule has hurt my feelings =( But remembering this old saying ... "Bring me into the company of those who seek the truth, and deliver me from those who have found it." ... has cheered me up =) "You still don't seem to grasp the difference between the behavior of for instance, the Iranian govt. and the American govt." I do, Natalie. We have discussed it at length. They have differences and similarities. That we judge some …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Natalie, it is difficult! I wish the good guys wore white hats and the bad guys wore black ones but that's not the case. And most of the civilized world agrees that the USA is a bigger threat to peace, which one hopes would include human rights, individual freedom and opportunity , than any other nation. Didn't I offer a link further up page that said the same? It would be nice to visit Iran and meet some Iranian people. I am certain that they are no different than you or I. Except they are the ones who …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Natalie, thank you. You are amazing too. Just about everything you said about Iran in your first paragraph can be said about the USA (govt.) as well. For example; "crackdowns by the govt. on people's freedoms" Many Americans are worried about effects the USA Patriot Acts and the recent suspension of habeas corpus have on their freedoms. I think it was Ben Franklin who said "those who would trade liberty for security deserve neither." "completely innocent men DID get tortured BOTH physically and psychologically." Yes. And the prisons at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo are full of people who are being tortured …
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Rabbit, good to see you back at the old stomping grounds.
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Waddup, gizoogle is the shiznit ... mostly. I am all for alternatives to google as I almost always root for the underdog. For anyone interested in other search engines please try ... Clusty the clustering search engine. Mamma the mother of all search engines. I use Clusty. It is nice because it provides regular results and "clusters" of results too.
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Aunty, I thought you looked familiar. I was around for the DU discussion (Radioactive Wounds of War) back in the day too. I like a good mystery but I like solving them better. Any hints as to what that different name then was?
Posted to Why Does CNN Suck?
-
Forgetting ones purpose is the most common form of stupidity. -- Nietzsche Posted by recursive prophet on Mar 28, 2007 at 1:58 PM Arpie, your best post ever! (... mostly.) " ... digital barfight " really cracked me up ! Thanks for the laughs and all the rest. I hope you stick around here at ITT and go on to even better than best !
Posted to Productivity: Is The Boom Over?
-
To Tell the Truth ... I am Bostonblackie (my fingers are crossed). Will the real Bostonblackie please stand up?
Posted to Preaching Revolution
-
"joyless Christian" "thank god I'm an atheist" I met a joyless atheist recently. Thank God I'm a believer. All the joyless people Where do they all come from ? All the joyless people Where do they all belong ?
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
No, Mike, God is.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Light blue is good but I like a dirty green. God is what? Exactly!
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
God is exactly what God will be. Sure, I like a dirty color. Clean colors are fine but dirty colors need love too.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Mike, I already answered that God question. If you want to see the answers again please start reading at Posted by David in Canuckistan on Mar 14, 2007 at 1:22 PM on this thread. If an Abbot and Costello "Who's On First?" effect was what we were attempting with that line of discussion then I think we have succeeded. But I think you looped back to soon. Your next question should have been "What will God be?" and then my answer would be "God will be what God wills to be." "wooly headed liberal" While I do have a …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Yes, I did answer the question. If you don't like my answer that is your problem, not mine. But, as always, I am ready to help you. "no one defies definition and classification" Except maybe God. (and that is answer enough for the rest of your thoughtful questions) Upon further consideration I will rephrase my statement; I resist definition and classification. "Your narcissism is getting a little extreme." Coming from you, Mike, that is the dull old pot calling the shiny new kettle black. But that's okay. I forgive you. Eventually I may be as you are but I will continue …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Mike, I never claimed to shine intellectually but thank you for the input. As I have mentioned before, I neither desire nor require proof of God. Faith is enough. Just as the last shall be first, and the first last: to lose is to win.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Mike, thanks for the victory. I know I am not playing fair , sometimes, but it was fun. Next time I will let you win but I wish you had asked me how the last can be first. Arpie, we have the ability to laugh and being created in God's image I think that God enjoys a good laugh too. Hmmm ... a bible passage with a reference to people laughing. I seem to remember Sarah laughing but here are 3 verses and there are more. If a wise man contendeth with a foolish man, whether he …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Is a candle brought to be put under a bushel, or under a bed? and not to be set on a candlestick? Mark 4:21 Funny and appropriate to this discussion, I think. Arpie, that your understanding of the story of the Canaanite woman is different than mine does not surprise (or discourage) me. You are not alone in your belief and you have every right to it. You asked about humor in the bible and I pointed to a story that made me laugh (and you laugh at me). If it does not work for you, that's okay. I …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
spokesmutants for your faith They are not speaking for my faith. They are blind guides who strain at a gnat and yet swallow a camel. (that's more biblical humor - Matthew 23:24). Only I speak for my faith.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
I know, everybody funny, now you funny too. (George Thorogood - One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer) Funny and appropriate to this discussion. (I think George and Will Rogers would have gotten along.) Luminous Beauty, It's YHVH (not 'yhwh') ... you die now, infidel !!! Just kidding! I like the V because there is a vav in my name ... DVD. And thanks for my new word of the day; supervenience. Tricky! It's the doing that is the main thing, not explaining it. Exactly ... doing is being and that is what matters ... mostly. Arpie, you said …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
As I said "There IS laughter in the good book " (emphasis added). The story of Elisha and the children and the bears made us all laugh, by our own admissions. It is funny and ironic. Not necessarily literally true but perhaps having a lesson that is figuratively true. The story of the Tree Of Knowledge of Good and Evil is an interesting story. "Don't ask too many questions. You wouldn't understand anyway" But ask and understand they did. And YHWH killed them for it. We are asking the questions right now and trying to understand. …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Not exactly my type but she's hot ! Just so long as she is a Woman aged 18 - 99 you are happy, eh, Mike?
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
It helps if you think of priesthoods, scriptures, and all that stuff as steps in the effort to understand, rather than as literal truths with any kind of permanence. Exactly ... good post, Kuya. When love is implemented, the perennial law of the jungle is surpassed, and miracles take place in the lives of people. Thanks, Kuya, for proof once again that "all we need is LOVE". (and a basic understanding of "how many angels can dance on the point of a needle") Tell me if you have understanding. Thanks Tex. I will let you know ;)
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
The origin of the world "... joy!" (full frontal nudity usually is - and the 'fig leaf' door was a nice touch) I do declare!
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
to know good and evil Knowing good and evil is easy. Knowing which is which can be harder.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
"outnumbered" Naaah ... you are one of us, Arpie. Devout atheist, indeed! I think you are backsliding on your faith. "Sad is the atheist who must seek sanctuary among believers" One of us! One of us! One of us! Sanctuary you shall have, if you are one of us or not. And you should be happy! Remember ... I won't excommunicate or kill you!
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
"noticed your reference to Mydixadril. I just got it. 5 groans." That was a good one, Arpie! Thanks for noticing, Luminous Beauty, it went right by me and I never gave it a second glance. And I saw mention of Mydixadril today on another thread so I guess 5 groans is a good score. I am looking for inspiration here too. I want to elaborate on In the Garden and the tree of knowledge of good and evil and may have a few questions for Tex, but I have to get dinner started now. So long, …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Sat Sri Akaal Blessed Be Who says Truth is God. Today I was in town for a celebration at the old, but new and improved, Gur Sikh Temple (despite sadly being reported as a road closure) for a reopening ceremony today. May it stand for another 90 some years. Good friends, good people and a good time! Luminous Beauty, good questions for Tex. I would also ask Tex's opinion as to why the tree of knowledge of good and evil, and subsequently the tree of life, was forbidden fruit?
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Hi Tex, thanks for your response to my question. Your answer the fruit was forbidden because knowledge of good and evil implies a choice man is ill equipped to make reminded me of what I wrote earlier upthread; ... to know good and evil ... Knowing good and evil is easy. Knowing which is which can be harder. You gave a fair answer but I would like to clarify a couple things and ask you another question or two about your understanding of this amazing story In the Garden. My original question, why the tree of knowledge …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Nature? The world? or some state of being? Because it is our nature to?
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Hi Tex, thanks again for responding. I am not a very good Christian either. Sometimes I worry about a lightning bolt from the heavens to strike me down for my heresies. And that this doesn't happen is further proof of a loving and forgiving God. It seems you get what I am driving at when you ask Was it forbidden as the first test of man's obedience or was it forbidden out of love? Is God a cold remote dictator or a benevolent creator? I believe God loves us and forbid the fruit of the tree of knowledge of …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Well, Mike, your last was better than your previous comments. It is nice to see you try to be friendly (and funny). That was a good effort (I laughed). What makes you human, Mike? Seriouslyositly.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Mike, not all , just better than your recent previous comments here on this thread. I think so at least but understand if you disagree. Some of your previous comments lack the respect that I feel they should show for others and their beliefs. But I digress ... you already know how I feel about respect.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Yes, Mike. Low. Have a good weekend, everyone.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Tex, both or neither.
... for God maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust. -- Matthew 5: 45
Job is a great example of faith. The story of Job also has a parallel with the story we see in the Garden of Eden. Just as Adam and Eve were "good" and walked with God - so Job was a godly man. But as Adam and Eve were tempted and failed to overcome the temptation with faith and were changed by it conversely we see Job …Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Tex, indeed, Satan may have God's dispensation to go to and fro on the earth but ...
The earth is the LORD's, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein. -- Psalm 24:1
Thus saith the LORD, The heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me? and where is the place of my rest? -- Isaiah 66:1
... the world belongs to God, not Satan. When Satan tempted Jesus and offered the kingdoms of the world in return for worship from Jesus it was …Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Sandalwood, welcome! ... seeing for oneself ... I like it and live it. I am a congregation of one. Some people see the same yet be differently. Some people be differently yet see the same. I don't know how it could be otherwise either.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
"But it is interesting to be reminded that there are far more intellectual approaches to spirituality than are on offer in Christianity and Islam." Arpie, the intellect and spirituality rests within the individual. (I+you=we) is who (I+you=we) are and (I+you=we) will be who (I+you=we) will to be. Adding + him or + her is what makes it more complicated than a broad stroke with a paint brush. I was born into a Mennonite family yet I can make a claim to being a yogi too (not a master by any definition). And I study, meditate, chant and pray too. All of …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Kuya, how your life is lived is very important. For me, Yeshua is a subject to follow as much as he is an object for veneration. Mike, yes, I am still a Mennonite but as I grow from day to day I become new things too.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Mike, don't be so hard on yourself. You have grown on me and it wouldn't be the same without you. I have learned so much from you and am forever thankful ... and either hand works for me. Luminous Beauty, excellent ... you can be didactive anytime you want to. Praxis makes perfect! And, indeed, if one never tries something new, and begins it anew, how will perfection be made better? I hope you find the time to ask some evocative questions (you know how I like questionnaires). Arpie, distinguishing between eupraxia and dyspraxia …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
And so it goes ... Kurt Vonnegut was promoted to glory today.
Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
The irony is delicious but I have the appetite for the explanation as well.
"I am, incidentally, Honorary President of the American Humanist Association, having succeeded the late, great science fiction writer Isaac Asimov in that totally functionless capacity. We had a memorial service for Isaac a few years back, and I spoke and said at one point, 'Isaac is up in heaven now.' It was the funniest thing I could have said to an audience of humanists. I rolled them in the aisles. It was several minutes before order could be restored. And if I should ever die, God forbid, …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Truly scrumptious.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Even David hates you now Not true, Mike. he's just too polite to say so. But you, Mike, are stretching the limits of my politeness. PS - to Kuya - Posted by Kuya on Apr 16, 2007 at 1:29 AM - great post.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
You know what I wrote is true. Mike, what you wrote is not true. And I say Luminous Beauty is lovable - so there. Even you are lovable, Mike, though it is not as easy to love you. Mike, were you trying to reference something from Romans? It only has 16 chapters. If those numbers are verses they may be backwards and you will have to let us in on which chapter you are referring to.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Mike, I am not lying. You are lovable despite your efforts to be unlovable. I love you, so does Jesus and I suspect that Luminous Beauty loves you too (the way a cat loves a mouse). PS - still waiting for the clarification of your bible reference and if I have made any errors in my references I would appreciate specific instances so I may correct the record.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Okay, Mike, the joke is up. You gave it away when you questioned my sanity (knowing that you do not believe in mental illness). But your effort to be complimentary almost brought a tear to my eye (I laughed so hard). Seriously!
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
"Just keep on flaming. I've got lots of wieners and marshmallows. Plenty for everybody." I got chocolate and graham crackers. With your marshmallows we can make s'mores.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Aunty, hi there! It's all very interesting. Our friend Mike has apparently played with various sock puppets named Hawaii Jack, Bart (probably) and now Boston Blackie. It would be entertaining except he can't seem to make a believable and variable puppet ... it's always the same old same old. I am expecting Boston Blackie to start going on about Ayn Rand any minute now. And if the pattern holds true then Mike will be back soon and thank Boston Blackie for taking care of his "light work". Unless the "blondemike" username has been banned? But not too likely as ITT seems …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Hi Bostonblackie ... welcome! After digging in the archives I have reached the conclusion that Mike (aka blondemike and the legion of other aliases which sadly includes yourself) and Jack Barnes (aka et al) are one and the same. So I have to disagree with you here as the evidence does not support your assertion. If you would like to see the evidence that I have based my judgement upon I would be happy to share it here. Oh, I tried to read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand but didn't get past the first dozen or so pages ... it just …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Mike, my friend, I am getting tired of the puppet show. I have seen better. If the show must go on, that's fine. I can play along, cheering and clapping, booing and hissing, as I think appropriate because I think there is some value in it. But if you want me to pull back the curtain and end this farce then all you have to do is ask. I have enjoyed your participation here and want you to know that I support your right to be here. But, as your friend, I must tell you that I do not think it …
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Arpie, I think old dogs learn new tricks all the time. And puppies can learn old tricks too. Doing them with style is what counts and is sadly lacking all too often.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
So the show goes on then? Okay. But it seems we have to finish this scene. Bostonblackie, you did step in something and it smells. Regarding the use of pseudonyms here ... I disagree. Do you have any evidence for your assertions or do you assert them on faith? I assert that my friend Mike is a long time resident under the bridge here at ITT albeit under many different names (your's included). Would you like to see the evidence? Or do you concede my assertion?
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
"Obviously several of the regulars here are posting under multiple aliases. Frankly, I don’t care. I’m more interested in the content of what they write." Sounds like a concession of the point I was making? There is evidence to support my assertion and it is a selection of quotes and content posted here at this site over the last few years (it has nothing to do with addresses or anything illegal). Thanks for your help with Natalie. And, as always, I hope you stick around here.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Eric, not at all. I was suspicious and have been proven correct. While it is rare, Mike has apologized before. And he never gives up. He'll be back.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
When you wish upon a star Makes no difference who you are Anything your heart desires Will come to you If your heart is in your dream No request is too extreme When you wish upon a star As dreamers do Ahhh - Jiminy sure has a way with words ;) Cats should apologize to mice and vice versa. And sometimes they do. Even Itchy and Scratchy got along sometimes. Resisting temptation (forbidden fruit) is what it's all about. "I can resist anything except temptation" -- Oscar Wilde
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Hey, an alter-ego is fun! Jiminy Cricket is a perfect alter-ego for me and if a Canuck flag gives it away ... so much the better.
Posted to Reclaiming What Makes Us Human
-
Capitalism Saved America and if you don't believe me I'll kill you. No ... God Bless America ! And if you don't believe me I will kill you! And excommunicate you too! (just kidding!)
Posted to Which Side Are We On?
-
"... I'm not a pacifist and regard that as an immoral position." (Posted by blondemike on Mar 13, 2007 at 9:34 AM ) Mike, I am a pacifist ... mostly. Please tell me more about your supposition on that position.
Posted to Which Side Are We On?
-
Mike, we will have to agree to disagree about God. Maybe we could agree that God (if he existed for you) would certainly not bless America. Thanks for the pacifism question response. Obviously we disagree. ChristCult nuts , is that really necessary, Mike.? Can't you at leastqualify it with a word like "most" or "some"? Tiger, not all people who believe in God are bible thumpers, whatever that means, or expect submission from everyone. God doesn't expect anyone's unwilling submission and neither do I.
Posted to Which Side Are We On?
-
Mike, don't be disingenuous, damnit ;-) Yes, I suppose I know what bible thumpers are and I am sure there are more than a few in Canada. I was making the point that not everyone who has read the bible, and found it profitable , is a bible thumper and again I ask; whatever that is (seriously- are there buddha thumpers? or others thumpers?).? And thanks for your admission that there are religious people who are reasonable. Please continue to prove that there are some atheist people who are reasonable as well ... or not. I defend pacifism …
Posted to Which Side Are We On?
-
People who need serious surgery in Canada come here. That's true as I know someone who, against her doctor's advice, went to the USA for medical treatment, paid thousands and thousands of dollars for treatment and died regardless of the treatment but at least she died satisfied that she had tried everything. I have another friend who is a dual citizen and when he got sick while down in the USA he hustled back up here to Canada for medical treatment. What would of cost him a fortune for treatment in the USA didn't cost him a penny here in Canada …
Posted to The Health Care Monster Returns
-
I have heard that in Canada one cannot get heart bypass surgery after a certain age (60 i think). Is this true? Wolf, not true. Sounds like a campfire story meant to scare people away from a universal healthcare system.
Posted to The Health Care Monster Returns
-
David, I've been told by Canadians that that IS true and not only for bypass surgery. Mike, I had never heard of such a practice and would expect an uproar of public disapproval if it was so. I did some quick research and found nothing to substantiate it. I did find some information on the prioritization of patients on waiting lists for some surgeries like organ transplants and bypass surgeries but nothing to indicate that people over a certain age are being prevented from bypass surgery or any other medical treatment. The Canada Health Act mandates that all residents of Canada …
Posted to The Health Care Monster Returns
-
Canada has a good healthcare system by any standards and Canada does boast one of the highest life expectancies (about 80 years) and lowest infant morality rates of industrialized countries. Do some research if you have the time, that's fine. Just keep in mind there is a difference between prioritization of waiting lists and denying people treatment. Someone who dies while waiting on a list in Canada is just as dead as the guy who died because he couldn't afford the treatment in the USA.
Posted to The Health Care Monster Returns
-
Here are some links that everyone interested in comparisons between the Canadian and American healthcare systems could take a look at. The Health of Nations: Oh, Canada! (this one was a good read) Policy: Oh Canada! Physicians who have practiced in both the United States and Canada compare the systems. Canada's Single Payer Health Care System - It's Worth a Look I am blessed with good health and the intervals between visits to my doctor is measured in years and even decades so I don't have much in the way of personal experience with being a …
Posted to The Health Care Monster Returns
-
Mike, none taken. I read them and found them to be fair and impartial assessments ... mostly. Read them and tell me if you think they are unbiased and address any items you feel were biased. But try to keep in mind that you are biased to start with and so am I.
Posted to The Health Care Monster Returns
-
Everything may be a commodity. But not all commodities are measured in dollars and cents (or sense). Some are measured in love.
Posted to The Health Care Monster Returns
-
"I’m so going to love it when we succeed ..." And when will that be, Hyjinx? Another 4 years and thousands more dead people later?
Posted to Counterinsurgency 101
-
Kuya, good to see you around here again. And good to see you getting along with Mike. Come on everyone, let's all join hands and sing ...
C'mon people, now smile on your brother, ev'ry-body get together, try to love one another right now. -- Get Together - Chet Powers
You mentioned sunsets and sunrises and I pointed the same thing out not too long ago ... "but the sun doesn't rise and fall ... it is we who rise and fall." (Posted by David in Canuckistan on Dec 20, 2006 at 7:07 PM ) ... and Mike advised me …Posted to A Politically Correct Lexicon
-
Peace ... right back at you, Kuya. Exchanging ideas and learning from others is why I come here too. I'm glad to hear that you are enjoying your conversations with Mike. I enjoy talking with him too and while he has sometimes slipped into unnecessary incivility during our conversations, and since I refused to respond in kind, we have been able to get past it and get along quite nicely. Right, Mike?
Posted to A Politically Correct Lexicon
-
I can feel the love ;-)
Posted to A Politically Correct Lexicon
-
"I did not mean disrespect," said Rep. Joseph Krawczyk, who sat with his hands on his lap during the applause. The bearded and craggy Republican was a career soldier and is a Vietnam War veteran with a daughter on her third tour in Iraq. "I know from personal experience the effect of a message like this [can have] on our armed forces ... The words say, 'We can't win.' "
You can't win 'em all. This Rep. Krawczyk sounds like a sore loser who can't admit defeat when it is evident the war is lost. I suppose he supports the war …Posted to Vermont Legislature: Bring Them Home Now
-
Mike, is that another ironic rhetorical question? Please forgive me for asking but ... I quoted a portion of the article and commented on it. Please explain exactly what don't you understand and I will be happy to enlighten you.
Posted to Vermont Legislature: Bring Them Home Now
-
By refering me to your previous answer you are repeating yourself. Thank you for the clarification and my apology for my misunderstanding.
Posted to Vermont Legislature: Bring Them Home Now
-
Heck, good post. yellow journalism Scandal and sensationalism does make for good , and I use the term loosely, copy but that doesn't mean it isn't true. I would like to be more sure about many things but sometimes supposition is all you have to work with. I guess at least it keeps them off the street. hehehe
Posted to Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
-
Mike, what I liked best about Heck's post (Feb 15, 2007 at 6:36 PM) was that he was civilized and respectful in his response. And he managed to add some humour to make me laugh when some of the hateful dialogue (Redhorse vs. Mike) on this thread has made me so sad that I feel like weeping. Not only that but he did make some valid points as well. For instance ... Facts are better than supposition. But, as I noted, in the absence of cold, hard facts sometimes supposition is what we are left with and, as I noted, simply …
Posted to Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
-
Arpie, thanks. Maybe I am dreaming ... Redhorse, good to see you too (and the horse you rode in on.) Peace! Mike, I read through this thread again and can't find where Heck mentioned Chomsky at all. Could you pinpoint it for me please? Maybe you are referring to his remarks about Rush Limbo and the cheerleaders on either side? "So those of us who have opposed this mass murdering crew are as bad as those who supported them." I think you are making a rash inference here and I hope Heck is back soon to clarify …
Posted to Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
-
"I never wrote that he mentioned Chomsky" Then what's this, Mike .... "WTH's trick of comparing people like Chomsky with the Limbaughs" Heck, do you blame the critics of Bush as well as the supporters? And for what specifically? Is this your answer here re: witnessing illegal behavior; "I maintain they are as guilty as anyone for not bringing it to an end.? Isn't speaking out about it the first step to doing just that? Furthermore, Heck, you say that "what could have been an improvement the Middle East has been terribly botched" . I assume you are referring …
Posted to Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
-
I am just trying to understand, Mike. Thank you for the clarification. And thanks for your kind words (more irony). "I have made a ceaseless effort not to ridicule, not to bewail, not to scorn human actions, but to understand them." -- Baruch Spinoza
Posted to Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
-
Heck, thanks for taking the time to answer my questions. You asked a few yourself and I hope that my answer to the following question will suffice as an answer for all. Would you ever favor overthrowing a dictatorship by force? Only if I lived in one and only if it was time to say "enough". And, personally, likely not even then.
Posted to Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
-
Posted by blondemike on Feb 18, 2007 at 2:31 PM Good post, Mike.
Posted to Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
-
Guys, knock it off, please.
Posted to Interrogations Behind Barbed Wire
-
Posted by Eric Blair on Jan 31, 2007 at 12:20 AM Great post, Eric. I laughed too. But what about me? Who am I? Probably just another sucker for articulate histrionics as well as the inarticulate. Thanks for lightening the mood.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Thanks Luminous Beauty. I am living the dream. Remind me ... are you a spanker or spankee?
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Eric, your BEST POST EVER !!! Luminous Beauty, catholic guilt , one of your best posts too! (the irony was so gentle I thought an angel was tapping me on the shoulder) Mike, the last time I was spanked it was voluntary too.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
... and it gets better. Surreal and phantasmagorical even. Well done, Eric! You live up to your namesake.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
At the vortex of this one, my best guess would be you, Davie. You have the imagination and sense of humor for it. But not the time! Time is chasing after all of us.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Of course there is a Canuckistan but to find it you will need directions; It's past the second star on the right and straight on 'til morning.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Ahhh ... time ... to dream ... I have a place where dreams are born And time is never planned. It's not on any chart; You must find it with your heart, Never Never Land. -- Peter Pan
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Arpie, I am back from Never Never Land and will be very happy to hear any stories you have tell. I hope it's a story about pirates!
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Ahoy ye scurvy an' scabrous dogs! If ye be wantin' t' talk like a pirate 'ere be help for land lubbers an' bilge rats alike. O' course a bit o' grog in yer belly is first an' foremost t' talk, an' walk, like a pirate. Avast me maties! Raise the missen mast an' make ready t' set sail! "our sweet 'n' somewhat girlish cabin boy, Davey (Jones, is 't?), t' entertain." Aye, a pretty boy I be but have ye ever met a cabin boy with a real yardarm? Aye, be he am I, says I. Yo Ho! …
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Mike, it's not ebonics, it is pirate parley. Hmmm ... a translation? I recommend grog - rum cut with water. In the good old days the pirates used rum to cut stinky drinking water stored in barrels tied to the masts of their ships so in our modern world the water could be optional but, once again, is recommended. Drinking grog not only helps one to walk and talk like a pirate, if a pirate they be, but it also helps landlubbers understand what pirates are talking about. So ... drink up, me hearties! Brave Dave (Cabin Boy and Pirate in …
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Be interested to learn if we all agree most people misrepresent themselves online but not us. Ain't no flies on us! I think that it is possible that some people online represent themselves as they wish to be. A technical misrepresentation it may be but wishing can make it so and doing is being. After all ... how could anyone make this shit up? And the answer is that we do. You will be who you will to be.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Yeah, it's not so bad here. There are lower levels of hell to be sure. How do you "save to cache"? I could have used it a couple minutes ago. The edit button is nice.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
I am back too.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
cavorting with the natives. I went native a long time ago. I shouldn't tell you this ... but we are restless.
Posted to In You More Than Yourself
-
Well said, Maria.
Posted to Love the Warrior, Hate the War
-
Ahhh ... the War of 1812.
War of 1812 - Worms Arrogant (sung to the tune, sort of, of the Battle of New Orleans by Johnny Horton) Oh, come back, proud Canadians To before you had TV, No hockey night in Canada, There was no CBC (Oh, my God!). In 1812, Madison was mad, He was the president, you know He thought he'd tell the British where they ought to go He thought he'd invade Canada, He thought that he was tough Instead we went to Washington.... And burned down all his stuff! And the White House burned, burned, burned, And …
Posted to Love the Warrior, Hate the War
-
All war is ill conceived. At the time, Canadians were Britons (in a colonial sense). Canada did not begin to achieve it's independence from Britain until some decades (and centuries) later. Tex, curling is incomprehensible to some Canadians too but I am glad you like the beer and hockey.
Posted to Love the Warrior, Hate the War
-
Any logical "empire" would have already consolidated Mexico and Canada into its fold ... Tex, they have. It's called free trade. When 'tar sands' are included Canada has the second largest oil reserves in the world. Middle Eastern oil is "heavy crude" ... Hmm ... they have (or had) light sweet crude too. But it may be that most of the good stuff has already been pumped and they are left with mostly heavy crude now. Except maybe in Iraq? But it's all oil. If oil was the only reason to have a presence in SouthWest Asia as the article …
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Once again Israel gets smacked around for no real reason......Strange. Tex, I hardly smacked Israel around. You brought up the countries you said the USA benefits by it’s protection in the Middle East and I named another country that receives the benefits of the protection you mentioned. And I supplied quotes from President Bush to support my statement. Congressman Ron Paul sees an Escalation in the Middle East and he mentions Israel. What’s so strange?
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Whattheheck, lobbyists are thick on the ground here too but don't wield quite as much power as they do in the USA. Recently Canada has introduced legislation on the federal and provincial level to keep the lobby groups on a short leash. It's important to make sure that lobbying and the influence the various groups have doesn't become influence peddling which is a crime under Canada's Criminal Code.
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Tex, we were talking about the Middle East until you mentioned Europe and Japan. Israel is in the Middle East and relevant to the discussion in my opinion. I wasn't aware I presented a thesis. Perhaps you would be so kind as to explain what it was? I never said defense of Israel was the primary reason for war. But it is one of the reasons as the rhetoric makes clear. A hunt for weapons of mass destruction and a liberation in the name of Iraqi freedom were a few other reasons put forward to justify the war. Neither has …
Posted to Spoils of War
-
"Spoils of War" aside. A good article. Informative and well written. Rip off reconstruction contracts and spOILs of war. The invasion of the corporations as well as the miltary. -------------------- (Mike, I am pleased you seem to agree with what I said ... except as noted by your statement about first priority. Exactly how do you think I was being naive if this is what you were referring to? Or maybe everything I said was naive? Clarification please.) Talking about the why of an ongoing war is fine but right now I am concerned about the why and when of …
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Spoils of War Oil, the U.S.-Middle East Free Trade Area and the Bush Agenda Title and subtitle. Middle East. Tex, other than that I could agree with some of what you just said but disagree with your statement ... As none of these countries have oil reserves in any great quanitity and none are located in the Persian Gulf, they play no real part in this discussion. ... when it is quite obvious they are relevant to this discussion as they are all close neighbours. How would you like a war next door to you? Please give me your knee …
Posted to Spoils of War
-
German chemicals, French factories, Russian munitions, and Saddam were not an acceptable combination. Tex, you forgot the United States of America and the blood on it's hands.
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Being civil to the uncivil is how you civilize them.
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Mike, the advice works regardless of extremes. I practice what I preach and speak from experience. Try it and you will be pleasantly surprised. Consider that when one is uncivilized to the uncivilized that it becomes difficult to tell who used to be civilized (if either really were in the first place). Tex, please and thank you (with a glimmer of wit even!) are a good start. You took a step foward by following my advice but your rant about arabs and muslims was so many steps backwards that you may never catch up. Most muslims are no different than people …
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Recursive Prophet, sorry to hear you missed the "train" link. Rest assured I am saving you a seat, my friend, because I know you would be onboard (online) if it were not for your modem. Let me tell you about it ... The peace train link is a picture slide show with Cat Stevens singing his "peace train" song. The pictures are from Iran and show a beautiful country and beautiful people that are no different than you, me or the rest of the human race. People who, for the most part, want to live in peace. Too many …
Posted to Spoils of War
-
I would bet that you have never spent a substantial amount of time living amongst those mostly from a different culture/ethnicity. Recursive Prophet, I grew up in a rural area with a substantial Native American population and counted many as my friends. We played cowboys and indians (not very politically correct, I know, but we didn't care) with real horses (and real indians) and since the cowboys were outnumbered by indians they always won our games. Now I am grown and living in a different part of the country with a large Sikh population. So now I have …
Posted to Spoils of War
-
Of course in this retarded country 70% don’t believe in evolution but in Jeezez. Mike, some people, myself included, can believe in Jesus and accept evolution as well.
Posted to Spoils of War
-
exposed to different cultures. Did you truly find the two to be the same? Recursive Prophet, the same but different. What I did find consistently the same is some people's hateful (fearful?) disposition towards others simply because they have different colored skin, live differently, talk differently or believe differently. When I was younger the intolerance baffled me and I was always asking my parents "why?". They explained but I was sceptical. As I grew up I noticed the bigotry more and more but have never been able to fully understand it.
Posted to Spoils of War
-
It appears the attempt at a cease fire is over?
Posted to Spoils of War
-
I am not in favor of death under any circumstances. If a human being is deemed unfit for life within a society because of a terrible act against humanity, we cannot find justice by committing the same act ourselves. Rabo, sehr gut. Ich stimme zu. I am 'firmly opposed' to a death penalty too. If a human being is deemed fit for life within a society because of a good act for humanity we can find justice by committing the same act ourselves.
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Hi Rabo. I liked what you said so much it was only natural to echo it back to you. Thank you. Don't worry about the German flag. There is another guy named Frog who comments here at ITT and he is from France and sometimes he waves a French flag and sometimes a German flag. It's globalization. I believe (hope) my German was good too. It's too late at night here to check with my Oma (grandmother), or my Dad, but that's a good thing because when I try to speak German to either of them I get silence and I …
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Recursive Prophet, I don't think the answers to crimes and illness is more prisons or more doctors. Instead of building more prisons our focus should be creating fewer criminals. Rather than more doctors we need less sickness. And no executions and executioners. But your suggestion to deny any possibility of the death penalty for more heinous crimes, while making it available upon request for all others is interesting. A 'voluntary death penalty'. But it should be offered to all criminals. To deny the most heinous the right to die wouldn't be right.
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Thanks Heck, you honor me. Neither do I condemn thee; go, and sin no more. Which brings me to a favorite story of mine. I shared this story not too long ago on the Godless Fundamentalist thread but it is very appropriate for this discusssion so I happily share it again.
(There is a more familiar version of this story, but a friend of mine has told me of other rabbis that faced the same situation. This is their story.) A great rabbi stands teaching in the marketplace. It happens that a husband finds proof that morning of his wife's adultery, …
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Eric asks "why?" I wouldn't presume to answer for Luminous Beauty but perhaps the answer is ...
Hope springs eternal in the human breast: Man never is, but always to be, blest. -- Alexander Pope (click for link)
An excellent poem that may also answer the 'death penalty' question posed in this thread.Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Whattheheck, in answer to your hypothetical question ... something else; Recite poetry while I step in between them and get stabbed. Do I get flowers then too? (In lieu of flowers please send donations to a charity of your choice.)
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Heck, I was being a little cheeky in my answer which was (d) something else ... expressed as a combination of answers (c) poetry and (b) intervention and (a) flowers. Sorry for any confusion. My answer to your question was and is (d) something else ... like, avoiding the use of violence to solve a problem to such an extent as suffering violence myself. Pacifism and altruism, hand in hand, holding flowers.
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Luminous Beauty, you have asked a good question. And provided good answers. Given the situation my answers to your question would be 3 + 5 or maybe 4 + 5.
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Heck, I still have a couple questions about your hypothetical. If you wouldn't mind answering that would be great because I do want to try to understand the 'why' of your position. Do you really think that intervening using words and wits is a waste? Of what? Time ... effort ... a life, if it came to it ... or something else. And why? You said "Your slogan, "If it feels good, don't do it" Nope. My slogan is "If it feels good, be sure it's good, then do it." Sincerely, David in Canuckistan Chief Executive Officer Good Intentions Paving …
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Hmmm, maybe it's a two way at heaven's discretions. But maybe on third thought ... it is. If the road to heaven is paved with evil intentions, And too the road to hell ... it is. Then best be good our good intentions, And the best way ... it is.
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
My belief is that you would be throwing your life away since after he attacked you there would be nothing changed. He would then continue his attack on the woman. Possibly others as well. Maybe not, Heck. Maybe my poetry would soothe the savage beast in him ... or not. Maybe after he has killed me with his trusty screwdriver his bloodlust would be filled ... or not. That's the great thing about hypothetical questions ... the answers are hypothetical too. But regardless, I don't think it would be a waste, no matter what the outcome, so long as I tried …
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
why not have hanging or gas chambers or electric chairs or firing squads ? Indeed, Mike, why not get really old school and draw and quarter the criminals?
draw and quarter; To execute (a prisoner) by tying each limb to a horse and driving the horses in different directions.
Now that's therapeutic.Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Mike, once again, it seems that I find it necessary to apologize for the lack of clarity in my irony. Please forgive me.
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Good post, gglodoe.
Posted to How do you feel about the death penalty?
-
Maybe much or Iraq is in bad shape now, but it was in bad shape before the invasion. At one time, before the 1991 Gulf War and the sanctions that followed, Iraq was in good shape. Iraq had a reasonable standard of living. Healthcare, schools and infrastucture were the envy of many of Iraq's neighbours in the region. After the 1991 conflict and the sanctions imposed it all went down the toilet. And now, after the recent invasion and occupation, the standards in Iraq are at their worst.
Posted to Iraqi Health Care: Hostage to War
-
Wolf, I see that Jack already reminded you why the aggressive US attacked the peaceful Iraqi’s in ‘91. Consider that many Iraqis, and Americans, are peacful and desire to live in peace. They just get dragged along to the war by their leaders.
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the …
Posted to Iraqi Health Care: Hostage to War
-
Hey Frog, how goes it? Long time no see but good to see you again. Thanks for reminding me of Wolf's statement ... ... we have provided primitive cultures with modern weapons ... Wolf, feeling culturally superior, eh? I would say that any culture that still uses violence as a means of problem solving is woefully primitive. But is good to see you admit that it is we that provided some of these weapons and cause more problems than we fix. As for the oil ... America buys lots of oil from closer to home than …
Posted to Iraqi Health Care: Hostage to War
-
The average cost of winning a House race was just shy of $1 million. A Senate seat comes closer to $7.8 million. This should be a national scandal.
It is scandalous! What price would be a reasonable price to allow a candidate to let their potential constituants know what they stand for and against? Wolf, maybe this formula is worthy of consideration ... the price of a postage stamp multiplied by the number of constituents. a lottery. Jack, good idea. I have always thought that a lottery would be an excellent method of selecting politicians. Worth a try at least. And …Posted to Outlawing Legal Bribery
-
Hmmm ... we could cut that back even more, Wolf. There might be 300 million constituents but how many households are there? We don't need a stamp costed for each member of the same household, just one stamp per household per candidate. I wonder, how do we acess the value of people making phone calls or doing other political work for free (like MoveOn volunteers)? We don't. No value at all. There is a new circle of hell (circle 5.5) being constructed for telemarketers of all stripes.
Posted to Outlawing Legal Bribery
-
Yes, it is scandalous. Both the dollar amount and where it comes from Our elected leaders are supposed to be indebted to the people that elected them. That means you and me. Even if we voted for the other guy. Not some corporation or special interest group. Limitations on the money in elections would be good for free speech because instead of the money they spend it would be the words they speak that matters.
Posted to Outlawing Legal Bribery
-
His [Jack's] reiterant use of the words 'psychobabble' and 'wordsalad' ... Don't forget pot, scrub thyself and Ayn Rand. And the occasional slip with the right hand margin. Mike, you and Jack sure have a lot in common. Reminds me of Sifl and Olly. I like Mike and Jack. Double the fun!
Posted to A View on Pelosi from a World Away
-
Okay, Mike. If you say so ...
Posted to A View on Pelosi from a World Away
-
I care. Thanks for the information, Major. Jack, what's with the anal fixation in your comments of late?
Posted to A View on Pelosi from a World Away
-
Yeah ... more Sneetches on the Beaches.
Posted to A View on Pelosi from a World Away
-
If you are so fucking smart, why didn't YOU discover that blondemike was Michael P. Hardesty? Scorp, maybe Major didn't read the thread where blondemike was bragging about submitting a 5000 word article to Z Mag. That was the first clue that got me looking for the Z Mag article but I don't think it was actually published. A search did find mention of the same Z Mag brag posted by Michael Hardesty in 2004 right here at In These Times. Like you say, it wasn't too hard to figure out if you happened to read the first clue and then …
Posted to Chávez Consolidates Power
-
Luminous Beauty, I remember your verse. I have always maintained that my old friend Jay is not a troll. Here is my drunken poet impersonation (winkwinknudgenudge) for tonight .... I went out there, the places I have been and things I have seen. Throngs of trolls, thick in the thicket, missing the mark, snarl and snark, snarl, snarl, snark. I came back here, after things I had been and places I have seen. But there is fruit in the thicket, tonight ...
Posted to Chávez Consolidates Power
-
Hello Arpie (aka. Recursive Prophet), Does that mean you swear a lot or have nice handwriting? Just kidding! I have wondered if this Jay Cline is that Jay Cline. Jay ? Sorry if it seems like prying. I believe those like Jay that have any reasonable case to make should be not just welcome but prized on this site. Yea, speak on brother [or sister]. Be gracious. And heap coals on their heads. Forever and ever, Amen ... (Forgive me Lord, for I have sinned. Again, just kidding! Mostly!?)
Posted to Chávez Consolidates Power
-
Fortunately I am blessed with angels ... Luminous Beauty, thanks, you are too kind. Halo or horns ... I try to do my best. Yes, I have seen the discussion with Scorpy. It is nice to see a more personal side of him and hear his story. Barky, it is always entertaining. Not to sure about the quality sometimes.
Posted to Chávez Consolidates Power
-
all of you are crazy as mad hatters ... How about a nice cup of tea?
Posted to Chávez Consolidates Power
-
And we got to get ourselves back to the garden ... A late planting for the garden. Or maybe it's an early planting for the next season. That's another word for your list, Barky. Season. And plant. Don't forget to plant .
Posted to Seeds of Hope: Gardening in Barren Times
-
Harvest too. I read the same and that Saddam fed bread to birds during his imprisonment.
Posted to Seeds of Hope: Gardening in Barren Times
-
All this talk of gardens and weeds reminds me of Matthew chapter 13 with the various parables about seeds and the kingdom of heaven. Here is one of them:
Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also. So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou …
Posted to Seeds of Hope: Gardening in Barren Times
-
And as it regards Saddam and his masters of the harvest; He was a weed deliberately planted amongst the wheat and burned up with the field when the time was right. Just to clarify who the enemy sowing the tares really is.
Posted to Seeds of Hope: Gardening in Barren Times
-
Seed. I saved some seeds from last years pepper plants and tomatoes. I have always simply bought new seeds every year when I plant the garden but decided to try my hand at seed saving for a few plants. Don't tell the 'seed police'. Defiant garden, indeed! Hunt. Fish. That reminds me. I have to get a new fishing license soon. The old one expires at the end of March. Last year I forgot until the middle of the summer when I was camping and fishing and a friendly park ranger caught me without a license. He let me off …
Posted to Seeds of Hope: Gardening in Barren Times
-
Sooner as opposed to later. Soon enough to convince most people that anything has really changed, I guess. And for all of us Canucks. I would really like to see a Green Party candidate take a seat. If we have to put a good face on the corruption that we call politics I wouldn't mind a green tinge to that face.
Posted to Seeds of Hope: Gardening in Barren Times
-
"They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience every time." Eric, you are a breath of fresh air. Thanks. Especially for the quote. Who said that? A search turns up results that seem like it is a gamer phrase? The link was good too. Very well summed up. You should post more often. Ignore him!! Eric, easy to say. More difficult to do. Since I seem to find it therapeutic to try to help others get well. But ... that's probably a 'messiah complex' I suffer from.
Posted to The Caracas Consensus
-
... that you endorse the shit that Kamm spewed out makes me even wonder about your lefty credentials ... Perhaps I should clarify. I did not endorse Mr. Kamm's historical veracity but did enjoy his characterization of Mr. Hardesty as being deranged and a lunatic. Not that there is anything wrong with being a little crazy. Sorry for the confusion. My lefty credentials? I didn't know I had any. But then I didn't get my Lefty Decoder Ring either. That pissed me off. I sent in 1000 box tops from my favorite breakfast cereal, Chocolate Frosted Sugar …
Posted to The Caracas Consensus
-
You are contradicting yourself here, David. Not at all. Mr. Kamm derived his characterization of Mr. Hardesty from their discussion. I agree with Mr. Kamm's characterization but base that on my discussions with Mr. Hardesty (blondemike) here at this forum. Do you see the logic? Even if you don't, please remember that I defy logic and that contradictions and conundrums don't bother me in the least. Perhaps I should repeat myself and clarify some more; I did not endorse Mr. Kamm's historical veracity, or lack of it, but did enjoy his characterization of Mr. Hardesty as being deranged and …
Posted to The Caracas Consensus
-
as two mutual friends of Hardesty's have told me. Jack, so you and Mr. Hardesty (aka blondemike) have mutual friends? Are you and Mr. Hardesty friends too? Tell us more about the lengthier response from Hardesty please. (Jack, given your taste for scatological humor and identity mysteries ... Luminous Beauty, I too noticed that Jack's humour relies heavily on scatological themes. Have you seen A View on Pelosi from a World Away thread lately. Major found some more interesting research on our friend Mr. Hardesty.
Posted to The Caracas Consensus
-
Yeah. Yeah. Whoosh or subtle!? Who knows? Kant would be proud?
Posted to The Caracas Consensus
-
Thanks for the details, Mike (and Jack). The better I know you the better I like you. Both.
Posted to The Caracas Consensus
-
getting ridiculous No shit, eh !? Some people might reconsider some of the fertilizer they are spreading, try thinking before they put their foot in their mouth (after all ... it's covered in shit) and make use of the edit function.
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Mike, I am saddened to point out that you are guilty of ad hominem attacks. For example You're a rightwing weasel. and low IQ, rightwing pinhead like yourself ... So I will borrow one of your favorites ... pot, scrub thyself.
Ad hominem abusive or ad personam Ad hominem abusive (also called argumentum ad personam) usually and most notoriously involves insulting one's opponent, but can also involve pointing out factual but damning character flaws or actions. ad hominem
And maybe I am guilty now too for pointing it out. Oh well.Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
But it is very nice to see Mike and Redhorse getting along. Now play nice with Whattheheck.
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Redhorse, Yes, there is none so blind as he who will not see but I don't think Mike is blind, maybe just a little nearsighted (satirical humor, not argumentum ad personam). As for ad hominem and insults I can safely say we are all guilty of it to some degree at one time or another. Whattheheck, Thank you. Glad to be back. I went on a walkabout of the web for awhile but eventually came back to these old stomping grounds. Old friends are the best. Even if we disagree. Mike, There are subtypes of ad hominem for which I provided …
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
If you think his responses are in way adequate to address the points I made ... Adequate, not at all. But you still insulted him and that is an ad hominem by definition. Look Mike, I have gone round and round on showing respect for one another in these discussions with many people, Redhorse included, and once having made my point I am more than willing to let it go and let you carve each other up with words but I fail to see how insulting weasels and making derogatory comments about someone's IQ facilitate a meaningful and productive discussion. I …
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Mike, In the interests of peace, may I suggest we try to get along? When I initially met you at this thread, Fear and Voting in the USA, at Posted by David in Canada on Nov 8, 2006 at 3:48 PM, we seemed to get along so well. I think we have much in common and although we seem to disagree about a few things such as at this thread,The Godless Fundamentalist, I would like it if we could agree to disagree without resorting to taunts and insults. "Tis the season; Peace on earth to men of good will. …
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
David...I appreciate your point...and concerning you , I do refrain from the personal attacks... Redhorse, Thanks, I appreciate your consideration, hopefully I am not guilty of an egregious viewpoint and thereby worthy of a personal attack. I can appreciate your point as well, sometimes these discussions are very frustrating. We can't see each other smile when we do use some satirical humour without resorting to smiley faces =) and somehow the lack of personal face to face contact tends to make all of us more susceptible to using personal attacks. A conundrum. It's just that I feel that sometimes …
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Whattheheck, Peace and good will to you too. We have had our disagreements in the past and will probably have more in the future. Nonetheless I want to wish you a Merry Christmas (agnostic too if memory serves me correctly) and all the best in the New Year.
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Thanks Mike. I am glad we are not enemies. As for the defintion of ad hominem, my reasoning is not daft as you so charitably characterize it. My reasoning is based on the definition I provided, see the link several posts up, which clearly states ad hominem can also involve pointing out factual but damning character flaws or actions.
Ad hominem abusive (also called argumentum ad personam) usually and most notoriously involves insulting one's opponent, but can also involve pointing out factual but damning character flaws or actions. The reason that this is fallacious is that - usually, …
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Mike, if you felt it was necessary that's fine. As I previously mentioned to Redhorse you are free to conduct yourself as you see fit and the same goes for you. Carry on but please consider my advice to try to be respectful as much as is possible. It's worth the effort. You might concentrate on yourself and the virtue of conciseness ... Please elaborate. I am open to criticism, constructive or otherwise. Excuse me but why I would begin to care what Christmas would be like in a millenium ?????????? Just an observation as you mentioned it's pagan …
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
conciseness would be nice Mike, Thanks for your advice. I will take it under consideration. Clear, concise and (hopefully) correct are qualities I value and strive for. And I always try to remember that conciseness and clarity, or lack of them, in no way take away from the correctness, or lack of it, of an argument.
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Another computer, another ISP and you're good to go. Right, Mike? Er, Jack? Whoever you happen to be at any given moment. Major, I have noticed the similarities between Mike and Jack too. One doesn't even need another computer and ISP to create a second username. I think all one needs is another email address. If Jack and Mike are the same person I can't say I blame him for creating a second username as everyone wants to have a friend. Having offended everyone else at this forum Mike and Jack are truly made for each other.
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Please ... one Redhorse is enough = ) The reason your search shows this thread as a result is because on the first page Mike made a post referencing Z Mag. I wrote a lengthy piece for Z Magazine in April, 1990 - Posted by blondemike on Dec 19, 2006 at 5:25 PM Happy New Year!
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
How about HoarseWhisperer? I think other than a few book reviews that Mike didn't actualy get much published. Submitted an article in 1990 but maybe not published. Or so it would seem for an online copy at least See this link and look for Posted by Michael Hardesty on Dec 23, 2004 at 11:03 AM Anyways, enough Sherlocking. Mike (aka. Jack) was interesting and quite a character but I won't miss him too much. And like a bad cold we may yet see him again in some new incarnation.
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Mike, There was nothing inadequate about my research because I got the results I was looking for. That result simply being an affirmation that you weren't making it up. I enjoyed the pieces I did find, by the way, and thanks for sharing the rest of your publishing history. You're right that this is the only major board I know of, left or right, that is fair to dissent. I certainly wouldn't consider it slumming. In These Times is very fair and a better forum for discussion with a variety of interesting people I have yet to find. Mike, I'm …
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Amen! clap clap clap Angry since 1963, eh? That's a long time to be angry. I wasn't even born yet.
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Barky, excellent point. Jack, I think Whattheheck's joke might have gone over your head. You suggested some might practise brevity in regards to what they write whereas he is suggesting you practise abstinence. Whattheheck, good one!
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Hi whiny Jack, Whattheheck, I thought that was clever too. Ahh ... levity! David, bad one ! My estimation of you’re [sic] IQ level just went down thirty points. Jack, my estimation of your sense of humour has fallen as well.
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
you had posted under "Eric Blair" there yeserday. Cute but no cigar. Jack, please clarify. Do you think I am Eric Blair? Or just mentioning the location of my post in response to Eric's comment? you are a big disappointment, boy. So sad. I am sorry you are feeling so sad, Jack. I am disappointed in you too, but it doesn't make me sad.
I was disappointed, but very agreeably. --Macaulay
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Frankly, I thought maybe you were Eric Blair but are you denying it ? Jack, Yes. I deny it. I did not make a post under the name of Eric Blair. Eric, you will notice by the little flag icons, is from the USA and I am from Canada. I am a computer illiterate and would not be able to make my posts appear to come from the USA even if I wanted to. And I stopped playing with sock puppets when I was 5 years old. How could you be disappointed in me ? I'm practically the only here that …
Posted to White Progressives Don't Get It
-
Socialism requires the disarming of the populace, supression of free speech, supression of religious freedom, and the destruction of private property rights. Ahh ... the S word: Socialism. Canada is regarded as a socialist country by many people but perhaps not by a strict, or die hard Marxist, definition of socialism. While we enjoy many social programs, such as universal healthcare, that our American friends do not, we do not have a state planned economy which some would insist is a necessary condition to fit a strict definition of socialism. But we do have guns, free speech, religious freedom and private …
Posted to In Praise of Impeachment
-
Oh yeah ... impeach away. Justice requires it. My encouragement to people who work towards it.
Posted to In Praise of Impeachment
-
Bush is the bottom of any barrel and the rotten apple spoiling the whole barrel.
Posted to In Praise of Impeachment
-
Ban Cluster Bombs!!! I would like to ban war altogether but sadly believe that is unlikely in this world. Maybe in the next world ... but I digress. It's good to see the Mennonite Central Committee mentioned in this article. My church, through it's centralized organization, MCC, is doing what it can by opposing cluster bombs specifically and violence in general. Mennonite Central Committee - Cluster Bombs - The Case for A Ban Mennonite Central Committee Letter to Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice
Posted to What We Leave Behind
-
David, is it hard writing from that straitjacket ? Excuse me? Are you implying something I wrote is crazy? Or just being rude? If something I wrote is crazy you will have to be more specific and kindly correct me in the error of my way.
Posted to What We Leave Behind
-
Mike, you should take your own advice that you gave to Whattheheck at White Progressives Don't Get It. Your response is ad hominem attacks and an utter failure to either present a coherent response ... Posted by blondemike on Dec 18, 2006 at 10:48 AM I look forward to your coherent response. I hope that it will not include an abusive ad hominem.
Posted to What We Leave Behind
-
Mike, My request for a coherent response was not pertaining to your comments about the topic of cluster bombs and associated tangents. I have read your comments and found them to be coherent and accurate. My request for a coherent response was for clarification of exactly what you think I said that was so crazy as to require a straitjacket and a subsequent request for your proof for this craziness you allege I suffer from. Or, conversely, my request was for an acknowledgement and apology for your insult to my mental health. How does one "correct" craziness ? Since …
Posted to What We Leave Behind
-
Thanks Mike. I can appreciate irony and humour too but know it is does get lost in the translation sometimes. Please understand that I knew you were having fun with me, I laughed too, but our recent discussion over on the God thread, thanks to my esoteric mind and your exoteric mind, was becoming frustrating for me as well, so I called you on the straitjacket comment here. I think the result has been good. We have blown off a little steam and reached a better understanding of one another and maybe I won't seem …
Posted to What We Leave Behind
-
Hi Viki, doesn’t this counter the lessons I think it does. Seems like never again was just words.
Posted to What We Leave Behind
-
It's a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart. Ulysses Everett McGill
At the beginning of this discussion Wisceptic stated What does amaze me is that rationale people who would expect proof of any other extraordinary claims accept the existence of God with no proof whatsoever. That made me laugh! And cry. Proof !? We ain't got no proof. We don't need no proof ! I don't have to show you any stinking proof !! (Or stinking badges.) Has everyone forgotten what faith is? Faith: Confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of …Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
what should we try to become? Less judgemental and confrontational? More sympathetic and understanding? Yeah ... that would be a start.
I have made a ceaseless effort not to ridicule, not to bewail, not to scorn human actions, but to understand them. Baruch Spinoza
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
A son wouldn't be telling his father he believed in him unless he had good reason to. Don't you think?
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
the son was saying it to encourage his dad to reform Excellent reasoning, Luminous Beauty! Someone is thinking.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Agnostic: One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God. Agnostic: One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism. Whomever asserts the positive, god exists or this holocaust happened, bears the total onus of proof, I don't have to disprove a thing, they have to PROVE their positive assertion. Mike, Who is asking you to disprove anything? I can't prove that God exists. That's why I have faith God exists. What don't you understand about that? I don't know how to make it any plainer.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Barkless1, I would like to better understand the definitions of the terms in your formula for good and decent people. Please don't be offended when I ask you these questions as they originate from a sincere desire to understand what you are trying to say. Was it applied social science you were practicing further up this thread? @ Posted by barkless1 on Dec 16, 2006 at 12:55 PM Or was it that your imagination was running away along with your manners?
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Thank you for your thoughtful response.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Luminous Beauty and our new friend Barky, Click. Click. (Barkless1, I hope you don't mind me calling you Barky and counting you as a friend as I don't believe we are enemies. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong)
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Mike, Defying all reason and logic and making absolutely no sense is nothing new to me but it's good to hear that I make sense to someone. (Thanks Luminous Beauty!) I'm sorry that the definition of faith is beyond your understanding, Mike, but don't worry too much about it as you do have some good people for company. As for my sanity, I appreciate your concern, but rest assured that I do quite well judging with my heart first and my reason second. Sometimes I try to be more sane and reverse the …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Religion must be rejected (NOT outlawed) on all philosophic grounds. Mike, I think Kierkegaard might disagree with you. And several other philosophers and existentialists as well. But religion aside, what about God, Mike? Should God be rejected even if one rejects religion?
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Story Time, indeed. This one is about knowing and What Fish Enjoy. I hope you enjoy it as much as I enjoyed it.
Zhuangzi and Huizi were strolling along the dam of the Hao Waterfall when Zhuangzi said, "See how the minnows come out and dart around where they please! That's what fish really enjoy!" Huizi said, "You're not a fish — how do you know what fish enjoy?" Zhuangzi said, "You're not I, so how do you know I don't know what fish enjoy?" Huizi said, "I'm not you, so I certainly don't know what you …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Very much so ... thanks for sharing! I find myself an instant fan of Jalal ad-Din Muhammad Rumi.
As salt resolved in the ocean I was swallowed in God's sea, Past faith, past unbelieving, Past doubt, past certainty. Suddenly in my bosom A star shone clear and bright; All the suns of heaven Vanished in that star's light. ... Rumi
Thanks again. I will spend the rest of the evening reading Rumi's poetry and drinking a couple beers, after all ...What a loss, loss, loss, loss it is to remain sober among the intoxicated and …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
My reading of Rumi also brought me to the tale of the Blind Men and the Elephant and I thought I would link to it as I see it as being relevant to the tangent this discussion has found it's way to. There are several versions of the story and while Rumi had his take on it I particularly enjoyed this version below;
It was six men of Indostan To learning much inclined, Who went to see the Elephant (Though all of them were blind), That each by observation Might satisfy his mind The First approached the Elephant, And …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
David, you have given no intelligible arguments why I or anyone else should be believe in god. Mike, I see no reason to do so as I have seen no intelligible arguments as to why I or anyone else should not believe in God. If you or anyone else doesn't believe in God it's fine with me. I am here to have a discussion and try to understand other people's opinions and share mine. Take what you want and reject the rest. That's what I am doing. During this discussion I have clarified the definitions of terms, like ... …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
NO one ever claimed to know it all. How could anyone ? Mike, That's it exactly. How could anyone know for certain there is no God? I will be back later with more thoughts on this as you have provided me the very argument I was looking for that might satisfy your request for an intelligible argument that you can understand.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
NO one ever claimed to know it all. How could anyone ? Mike, That's it exactly. How could anyone know for certain there is no God? ... continued ... Conversely, you might ask; How could anyone know for certain there is a God? And my answer as I mentioned previously is; I cannot prove God exists. Therefore my belief in God is faith in God. (Luminous Beauty, I read the NPR This I Believe - Utterly Humbled by Mystery essay you linked and I agree it was spot on. Thanks for sharing it.)
Paradoxes don't scare …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
I wonder if we are talking about the same thing and how many of these math axioms are really postulates. Mike, Read and learn. If you can provide sources that contradict these Wikipedia entries I would be very interested in seeing them. Postulate
The term postulate, or axiom, indicates a statement or assumption that is agreed by everyone to be so obvious or self-evident that no proof is necessary ... Postulate vs. Axiom The terms "postulate" and "axiom" are frequently used interchangeably as synonyms for each other ... The term "axiom" has been applied historically to those statements that are …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
The people who assert belief in a supernatural force never come up with anything close to proof of same. It's not my job to disprove a negative, it's the believer's job to prove a positive assertion. To assign equal blame to fools and thinkers is absurd. Posted by blondemike on Dec 18, 2006 at 12:22 PM Mike, you are repeating yourself. See Posted by blondemike on Dec 16, 2006 at 4:43 PM So I will repeat my response; Who is asking you to disprove anything? Believers have faith (remember what faith is?) because they cannot prove God exists. To assign …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Every man is a fool in some man's opinion. A wise man changes his mind, a fool never. Spanish Proverbs Only a fool tests the depth of the water with both feet. African Proverb
I've probably forgotten more about philosophy than you'll ever know so I found your "read and learn" condescension obnoxious. Mike, I sincerely apologize. It was not my intention to be condescending. You had asked a question about axioms and postulates and I hoped to help further everyone's understanding on the matter. Please consider it a reminder of what you may have forgotten. Again, my apologies. David, you …Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
David, as usual your still evading the crucial distinction between the assertion of a proposition with failure to prove same and ... Mike, As usual you are still evading the definition of faith as I have repeatedly asserted that the crucial distinction is to be found in the definition of faith. Faith, by it's very definition, is a belief that is not based on proof. the nonbeliever's refusal to grant credence to an unproved proposition as if they were intellectual equals. I have not disallowed your refusal to grant credence to anything. When did I ever say …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
it is a lifeboat ... Barkless, Excellent metaphor. Any solutions? Throw them to the sharks? Sink and swim? Resign yourself to drowning with the satisfaction of knowing you did what you could to help? religion, "the opiate of the masses" I wish it were for me. When I occasionally attend my church some, not all but some, people get their torches and pitchforks out in preparation for my next heresy. Ahh ... Ignorance would be bliss.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Thanks Major, I know the koan. I was being sarcastic too. Again, my thanks. In fact, God cannot be killed, and I can prove it ... Major, I like your logic ... I wonder if Mike will.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Thanks Mike. Apology happily accepted. The warmth of mutual respect for one another, even if you can't respect faith, is so much nicer than cold contempt. I know you were trying to make a little joke but it is funny only at my expense. Just as you take some issues seriously so do I.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Dave, I was being sarcastic myself. But you probably knew that, too. I didn't know ... but I suspected. With you it's difficult to tell sometimes. But I wasn't being sarcastic when I said I liked your logic. the moral legitimacy of the scientific project. The atrocities of the past several centuries should have disabused all of us of that fatuous fantasy Yeah ... Seems the only thing we, the collective we, have done is get better at killing one another. I don't necessarily blame science but it has certainly given us the means to kill one another more efficiently …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
I'm glad you see through Kant's major premise Mike, I wouldn't say by seeing through it that I disregard it. I do see the contradiction in we know that certain things are unknowable but it certainly doesn't bother me. Another conundrum ... big deal. Probably our serious disagreement is that you come across as thinking that people motivated by reason should have respect for faith and I do not ... Why does reason disallow you from having respect for faith, Mike? Of course the actual people who committed these crimes do have total responsibility for their actions. I'm …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Damn! Am I letting my sense of gentle irony, get stampeded into cruel sarcasm again? ... Maybe. I don't know if Mike was being ironic. But try harder anyways. I will too. Push or pull ... whatever it takes to avoid the fall. Or whatever it takes to get back up after the fall. Like Barky says Might as well help out. I hope it's helpful too, otherwise I wouldn't be making the effort. Apologize and forgive and forget. I'm sorry if I have been hard on you too, Mike. Love ... right back at you, Luminous Beauty, good night …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
David, "unknowable" is no big deal ? I don't think so. Mike, so tell me what's the big deal then? I would like to know. Frankly, it was fun goosing the old bastard. Though we do also agree on many things. And that's part of what these discussions should be, Mike. Fun for everyone and a chance to explore their differences and similarities. If it's not fun anymore then why are we doing it? ******* You [Mike] are making an unfounded assumption that the physical universe, and our observation and analysis of it, constitutes the entirety of ultimate reality. It …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
natural expectation (the sun will rise) Null, but the sun doesn't rise and fall ... it is we who rise and fall. ( a favourite line of mine)
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Soup is simmering. Bread and cheese ready for broiling. The girl has called and is on her way after a stop at the grog shop for our libation. And I have time for another couple thoughts that came to mind while I sliced onions. Sadly, each of these has failed time and time again and, each time they do, they add a little more support to the conclusion that gods do not exist. One can't prove a negative, but it doesn't look good for the gods. Null, God doesn't mind being the underdog in the odds and there are still miracles …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Take a science course ... Now that is funny. (You're being deliberately obtuse for comedic effect, right?) David, I just saw your response to Null, how do you keep out of the insane asylum ?[redundant question marks redacted ]? I retract my earlier apology, you ARE nuts. Will Luminous Beauty be there too? Will you come visit? See you there ...
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
... here we are. Thanks for visiting. Come again! ... or are you a patient here now too?
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
So you weren't being obtuse on purpose? My apologies. but the sun doesn’t rise and fall ... it is we who rise and fall. You won't gain an understanding of this line in a science course. I guess comedy is a lost art. But tragedy ... now that's funny. They are letting you out, Mike? I have enjoyed your visit and will miss you. See you next time then. I'll save your seat in the group therapy room.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
David, that posting of yours yesterday sounded like a plan for date rape. Mike, To a mind like yours maybe ... I'm not surprised you would think so. Sorry to disillusion you of your sick fantasies but it was a simple evening. Good company, good wine, good food, good entheogen, good night kiss and a good night's sleep.
Ah! Sweet mystery of life, At last I've found thee; Ah! I know at last the secret of it all!
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
The Parting Kiss ... Tenderest pledge of future bliss ...
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
I like Mike too. There I go ... defying logic again. (Just kidding!) Barkless, thanks for the link. Luminous Beauty, thanks for the other link. Peace Everyone!
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
You too, David. Me too what ??? asshole or peace? or you like me too? All of the above ??? =) Sorry Mike, but at this point in our friendship I have to ask. Lumnous Beauty, the Mirror Neurons essay was great! It touched on so many of the ideas we have discussed over the past several days and even mentioned Richard Dawkins (the original topic here on this thread).
- excerpted from MIRROR NEURONS AND THE BRAIN IN THE VAT The possibility of multiple "minds" in a single brain is not as bizarre as it sounds. It …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
It will be a pleasure to read Sirens of Titan and Stranger in a Strange Land once again. I like them both because of the religious themes they have. Hopefully I can find my copies. My best books always seem to get loaned out to a friend, and that friend loans it to another and I never see them again. Vonnegut was what brought me here to In These Times years ago and Heinlein is a favorite too. John Cleese (Basil Fawlty) is brilliant. I have the Fawlty Towers series on DVD and know the episode well. …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Wasn’t that said here already?
Luminous Beauty said ... Time passes you say. Ah, no! Time stays, We go.
I think something like that was said here too.I said ... The sun doesn’t rise and fall ... it is we who rise and fall.
Very much like.Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
In Sirens of Titan I remember a spaceship powered by the Universal Will to Become (prime mover) which rang bells in my head and brought to mind I AM THAT I AM of Exodus 3:14 which can also be translated as I WILL BE WHAT I WILL BE. I will be what I will to be.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
" ... doesn't even believe in hell!" "... show him how wrong he really is." So true ... I like stories. I like true stories the best. But will settle for good stories. Or good lies. = )
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Good one, Major!
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Another!
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Learning is finding out what you already know. Doing is demonstrating that you know it. Teaching is reminding others that they know it just as well as you. You are all learners, doers, teachers. - Richard Bach
heavy, eh ... Jack, It might be heavy but if a simple country boy like me can lift it, so can you. Regardless of what universe you may find yourself in.Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Jack, It's clear to me. Where's the mud? Please be specific.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Thanks Jack. Much better. Now you are participating by sharing your opinion rather than just slinging mud at the opinions of others and we can make a mud pie together. It will be fun. And if the water is muddy, I don't think that anyone is really trying to muddy it with the intention of making it less clear or to seem deep. Sometimes playing in a mud puddle is just fun. Since you are so wise, in the matters of mud and otherwise, perhaps you would care to offer some more instruction as I do have a few questions. a …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
... that there is no evidence of a god. where has that been refuted on this thread or elsewhere ? Well ... I think there is evidence of God but you probably won't like it because it is circumstantial and subjective. The words rebutted and refute might not be the best terms to describe the points that have been made. The premise of there is no evidence of a god has been addressed at least. Having read the thread you will be familiar with this statement of mine; I have faith, faith being defined as …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Thanks Jack. I respect your opinion too, here on this thread at least. i think the one asserting the positive proposition has the burden of proof, not the "denier." Sure, but if I acknowledge that my proposition doesn't require a burden of proof to be true, for it to be true to me at least, and that leaves at an epistemological impasse that doesn't mean we can't be friends. I hope. And pray. So Jack ... given our epistemological differences but mutual respect ... I am curious and have to ask you why you are acting the way you are …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Your tone is much different hence my much different tone with you. That's nice. That you say shame on me when I'm presenting the best arguments and giving sources while not uttering a peep about redhorse or shitcago tells me more than I care to know about you. Read carefully, Jack. I said that my only possible comment on that Caracas thread, not to be confused with the Chavez thread, would be shame on you all. Keyword being ALL. All of you are treating it like it is a showcase for who can say the most incredibly rude thing to …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Auld Lang Syne Should auld acquaintance be forgot, And never brought to mind? Should auld acquaintance be forgot, And auld lang syne! For auld lang syne, my dear, For auld lang syne. We'll tak a cup o' kindness yet, For auld lang syne. - Robert Burns
All the Best in the New Year!Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Believe, while unbelieving, Behold, without perceiving! ... beautiful. How about changing it up a bit ... Believe, without perceiving, Behold, while unbelieving! Barky, I enjoyed the poem, thanks for sharing it. Where is here? There? When is now? Then? What is it? What was that? Why is it? Why is it that? Great questions. Thanks for reminding me. I too wish you were a little more explicit and a little less cryptic . And I do enjoy your questions. I have many myself. But ... Any answers? They don't even have to be great. I will settle for wild guesses. …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
poetasters -- A writer of insignificant, meretricious, or shoddy poetry. Thank you, Luminous Beauty, that will be my new word for the rest of the day. And tomorrow too. And meretricious for the day after that. The Suzuki quote made me laugh. I am a contrarian sometimes too. What rhymes with circle ?
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
There are no theists in Tierra. Artificial Life and Cellular Automata. This Tierra? Who made who? We're watching Blade Runner here tonight. Do androids dream of electric sheep? I think everyone imagines killing God at one time or another. Some do and others don't. malignant viruses ... virulent and contagious 'issues.' ... scientific charge against all such superstition. Strong words, Arpie. But you're a friendly atheist, right? You don't want me 'cured' of this virus against my will? Or a more 'final solution'? Do you?
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. -- Roy Gatty
All those moments ...Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
The many myths of religion once served a useful purpose to that 'selfish gene' that demand's solely its own propagation. You sure your name isn't really Recursive Professor? My religion , such as it is, encourages me to deny the 'selfish gene' . I haven't propogated yet either. How are you going to tax my thoughts? I like camping. Do we get to go fishing?
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
I don't grok it, Arpie. End the suspense. What is BASMAQPNx3 ? I am reminded of Every Good Boy Deserves Fudge . (hehehe) Arpie, I liked your poem and thanks for reminding me of The Last Answer . I know I have read it and will look for it in my collection and read it again. I will look for the stories you mention too, Luminous Beauty. ... David's heroic denial of biologic tyranny ... Me? (Who is Morris?) I think I know what you mean but it just might be a whooshing sound. Anyways, Luminous …
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Hope you get my point, and keep the faith. Said to LB but ... I do and will. Ah David-I'm a tad disappointed. Weren't you sent here to live up to my expectations? Sorry. Maybe. I have great expectations. But don't get your hopes up.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Quality entertainment ! Mr. Fey, Mr. Manganese and Mr. Mustard ! (Posted by blondemike on Jan 16, 2007 at 6:45 PM Mike, your best post ever !!!)
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Thank you, Mike. Ahhh .. the subtlies of irony and delectable wordsalads.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Hi Mark, where was that quote from?
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Mike, we can now buy liquor from privately owned and operated stores as well as from the govenrment operated stores. It could be the swamp you saw is Burns Bog.
Burns Bog is a raised peat bog located in Delta, British Columbia, Canada. It is the largest undeveloped urban landmass in North America. It is also the only known raised peat bog in a Mediterranean climate. Burns Bog is a treasure of a special kind, in part due to its sheer size, making it home to many beautiful and rare plants, animals and insects.
British Columbia is a beautiful …Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Anytime, Mike. Sorry to hear about Nina's medical problems. Flights of fancy are unlimited by your imagination. Have a good weekend.
Posted to The Godless Fundamentalist
-
Et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis. Peace on earth to men of good will.
Posted to Danger: A Policy With No Brains
-
Was that a joke, Mike? HA !!! That's Mister Manners to you, buddy! I appointed myself I guess. It's a dirty job but someone has to do it. I hope I do a fairly good job of it. When I first started taking part in these forums and discussions, here and at a several other sites a few years ago, I was more than a little shocked at the disrespect some people showed for one another for simply disagreeing with one another. So I don't put up with disrespect from anyone, whether I agree with their opinions or not. Most of …
Posted to Danger: A Policy With No Brains
-
the Left Mike, I don't like terms like right and left very much. I think they serve to divide us when we need to be united and trying to find things we have in common rather than differences. However, back a couple years ago Luminous Beauty found the Political Compass and several of the regulars here took the test. The reactions were something to see. A couple people who envisioned themselves as hardcore right wingers found themselves in the center and even, horror of horrors, leaning to the left. Some people were infuriated …
Posted to Danger: A Policy With No Brains
-
David, I don’t particularly have a problem with it but I won’t turn the other cheek to people like Scorp, to use the worst case example. Ahh yes ... Scorp. He is a long time regular here too. I ignore him for the most part. Luminous Beauty (and Rabbit when he was here) used to make the effort with him but it was like bashing their heads against a brick wall. Counterproductive. You got your work cut out for you ! Indeed. *************** My thanks to Mike, Redhorse and Chessfrog for taking part in the Political Compass test and sharing …
Posted to Danger: A Policy With No Brains
-
Beyonce’; Another sign of the end times. Tina Turner and Madonna sing, and dance, circles around her.
Posted to Beyonce's Bootyful B'Day
-
People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along?
Posted to Farrakhan Steps Back
-
I'm sure David is proud of you I am, mostly. Indeed, I am sure that David, sweet and gentle soul that he is, is sometimes horrified at the viciousness of the ridicule that I have heaped upon you. Horrified? Not at all. Thank you for your kind words, Luminous Beauty. After all, the path is long and our legs are short. And I am so tired.
Posted to The Neocons Lexicon
-
Before I go anywhere with "Canuckistan", I must ask: Is "Canuck" a self-deprecating pejorative to our good friends to the north, or is it a term of endearment? Can't it be both, Jay? Just like Yankee Doodle Dandee. ... some of my best friends are Canadian. Me included ... I hope!?
Posted to The Neocons Lexicon
-
Ahh ... Hobbes and his Warre of All Against All. Leviathan is a permanent fixture in my washroom and sits atop the toilet tank. No disrepect intended.
It is an old saying, That all lawes are silent in the time of warre, and it is a true one, not onely if we speak of the civill, but also of the naturall lawes, provided they be referr'd not to the mind, but to the actions of men, by the third Chapter, Art. 29. And we mean such a war as is of all men against all men; such as is …
Posted to The Neocons Lexicon
-
Thanks for the Canuckistan link. It's brilliant! My philosophy professor always recommended Hobbes as excellent reading material for toilet time. Fortunately I am blessed with an excellent digestion and excrete quickly so I don't read too much Hobbes. The reactions I get from visitors who dared to read Hobbes during their toilet are the best part. Some have no idea what it is they just read while others do but don't want to read Hobbes ever again.
Posted to The Neocons Lexicon
-
Wow ... great words, Luminous Beauty. I have written them on my heart. And printed them on a piece of paper to put on the 'fridge. Kernels like that are the reason I come here to weed through the tares. I hope my interruption doesn't dissuade Jay from answering or taint his answer if he does but I had to say something.
Posted to The Neocons Lexicon
-
I don't know why they haven't closed this thread; I wish they would. Begging for mercy ... eh, Natalie?
Posted to The 9/11 Faith Movement
-
I am very well, thank you, Natalie, and hope you are the same. It's likely the bug was a healthy touch of paranoia.
Posted to The 9/11 Faith Movement
Return to David in Canuckistan's profile
- Joined November 16, 2006
- Last Visit February 19, 2008
Other Profiles
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Ignoring Outrage, Obama Set to Expand Pentagon Presence in Colombia
- 9.
- 10.
RSS Feed