In These Times

test100 is right about the margin of error being much smaller for poll results at the extremes, but it doesn't take away from Klein's point about Penn's dubious tactic of investing his 1 percenters with disproportionate influence. Actually, I don't know why Klein mentioned the margin of error at all, apart from its (incorrect) use as a gotcha moment. It doesn't add to the piece at all, which is strong enough without it.

Posted to Trending Toward Inanity