Here's a nice set of pictures. See if you can refute these lies. http://www.nuclearpolicy.org/files/nuclear/fahey_jun_14_03.pdf
Member Profile
Pale Rider
Latest Comments view all 32
-
-
Maybe the lies you tell to refute earlier lies can be construed as fear. How about a little more scholarly research to show you how foolish it is to try to trivialize the risks of DU? http://www.nuclearpolicy.org/files/nuclear/fetter_jun_14_03.pdf Oh, and perhaps this has been cited as well: http://www.deploymentlink.osd.mil/du_library/du_ii/index.htm#tabl Funny how non-scientists like myself can come up with these things. Google seems to be the chink in the armor of the apologists. Perhaps Natalie ought to recuse herself from further discussion--it's hard to argue once someone has beaten their pithy arguments into the ground. No, better yet--Natalie: continue posting. Your lies help me …
Posted to Radioactive Wounds of War
-
How would you like to help with the recovery of DU, Natalie? Here, see if this sounds like it is up your alley. If you were following the links listed above, you would have found this little ditty from the US military which shows that DU is perfectly harmless. Go ahead, Natalie, go to MOPP-4 and get to work! If DU is safe, why does the military recommend going to Mission Oriented Protection Posture 4, the highest possible level, to handle DU? Soldiers go to MOPP-4 when directly attacked by chemical weapons such as blister agents, nerve gas and radiological devices. …
Posted to Radioactive Wounds of War
-
"None of the locations that you cited are in any way considered to be radiological materials waste dumps." Roger Ramjet, shame on you! Shame on you, LTC Helbig for lying and for trying to scare off good people who have proved you wrong time and time again! See the following: The use of DU weapons by the U.S., the U.K., and NATO in Kuwait, Iraq, Bosnia, Croatia, Kosova, and possibly Afghanistan over the past decade led to investigation and opposition in several countries. In 1999, MTP, the Laka Foundation (Netherlands), and the Campaign Against Depleted Uranium (UK) began the first attempt …
Posted to Radioactive Wounds of War
-
More on the use of DU in the Balkans: According to his statements, official precise data on the relationship between the rapid increase of, above all, malignant illnesses in Republika Srpska and the type of weaponry that NATO used during the bombing, is not yet available. Unofficially, however, we learned that the report by the Yugoslav Expert committee confirmed that the Allied aviation used radioactive projectiles; and due to the strictly confidential nature of this information, that document is unavailable to the public. When asked why official Belgrade sources and the ruling heads of Republika Srpska are silent about this, Stankovic …
Posted to Radioactive Wounds of War
- Joined September 23, 2005
- Last Visit October 27, 2005
RSS Feed