In These Times

Latest Comments view all 3

• • 12 Jul 06
  • 12:46 pm

  Here is an email sent to Mr. Allen: Interesting article. I think many in the Scholars for 9/11 Truth understand that we need to stay away from the pile theory. Not because what we can prove is not worthy, but because there is always an issue that is not air-tight (and subject to rejection by those in lock-step with our government). Please read the letter sent below addressing this very issue and making a point that is rock solid. It is my contention in this letter that the Truth movement is the defense team and all we have to do is …

  Posted to The 9/11 Faith Movement

• • 12 Jul 06
  • 12:47 pm

  Remember, the proof need not be complicated. I don't need to prove exactly how long it should have taken you to run that distance. Nor do I need to prove how much longer it would have taken if you stopped to place a bet at the dog track. To disprove your story, I only need to show that the story you gave me is not physically possible. The premise on which Dr. Wood begins her paper is the collapse time of WTC2 (the South Tower) as reported on Page 305 of the 9/11 Commission Report. It states that the building collapsed …

  Posted to The 9/11 Faith Movement

• • 12 Jul 06
  • 12:47 pm

  Based solely upon this simple, yet elegant proof, she has proven that the government theory about the collapses is mathematically and physically impossible. She doesn’t need to prove how the buildings came down; she doesn’t need to prove what caused them to come down. She doesn’t need to prove who was on the planes, who was flying them, or whether the planes were the ones noted by the government. She doesn’t need to prove what hit the Pentagon or what happened in Shanksville. She doesn’t even need to prove who orchestrated the plot, how many were involved, and how it is …

  Posted to The 9/11 Faith Movement