|
"Witness 3" and her children and grandchildren were nervous as
they started heating food on their stove at around 6 a.m. on December
13, 1998. Planes and helicopters had been circling for most of the
previous day over their small village of Santo Domingo in the northeastern
Arauca region of Colombia. The helicopters were battling with leftist
guerrillas in the brush about half a mile from the village, shooting
machine guns as they swooped low.
At about 10 a.m., as she walked across the room to put more wood
on the stove,
 |
|
A drawing of the massacre by
a child from Santo Domingo.
|
everything went black. Seconds later her children and grandchildren
were screaming and bleeding. Her two daughters, ages 5 and 7, were
dead. Her son and grandson died soon after. "He was saying 'Help me,
mom, help me,' " the middle-aged woman, who did not want to reveal
her name, told an international human rights tribunal at Northwestern
University Law School in Chicago on September 22 and 23.
In all, 19 people, including seven children, were killed that morning
in Santo Domingo. At least 25 more were seriously injured. Witness
3 and other residents say they have no doubt the attack on their
town came from Colombian military helicopters dropping bombs. But
the Colombian government maintains that the town was demolished
by a powerful homemade car bomb placed in an abandoned truck by
guerrillas with the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia).
The tribunal, convened by Northwestern's Center for International
Human Rights, aims to determine whether the government was in fact
responsible for the massacre and whether it violated five international
human rights treaties in the process. While it is not judicially
binding in any way, human rights workers hope the publicity the
tribunal garners will show the Colombian government that its brutality
and impunity is not going unnoticed.
There is an average of more than one massacre--defined as the killing
of three or more people at one time in one area--a day in Colombia.
There is a 98 percent impunity rate for the perpetrators of this
brutality, with not a single person brought to trial last year for
any of the almost 400 massacres that occurred.
Colombia was represented by two Chicago attorneys at the tribunal,
since the government refused to send a representative. But the government
did send a sensational video called "La Gran Verdad en Santo Domingo"
("The Great Truth in Santo Domingo"). The video features B-movie,
horror-style music and footage of actors dressed as guerrillas negotiating
a transfer of 1,300 kilos of cocaine, as an English voice-over describes
the government's efforts to "keep the dangerous drugs from reaching
the U.S."
The prosecution asserted that U.S.-made helicopters and munitions
were used in the massacre, a point that is particularly relevant
given the recent approval of the $1.3 billion Plan Colombia aid
package to the Colombian military despite its rampant human rights
violations. This allegation was backed up by the FBI, which issued
a report in May confirming that specimens recovered after the massacre
came from "a United States designed AN-M41 fragmentation bomb and
fuse."
In early December the tribunal will announce its verdict. This
is part of a growing movement of international tribunals for crimes
that aren't being brought to justice in their own countries. There
have been three other international tribunals regarding Colombian
atrocities in the past few years--two in Canada and one in the Colombian
town of Barranca.
"The massacre in Santo Domingo is one among thousands of serious
crimes committed in Colombia every year," says Father Javier Girardo,
a Jesuit priest who heads the International Commission for Justice
and Peace. "International tribunals like this are necessary because
even if they don't affect the judiciary, they bring injustice to
light in the international community. It shows the government and
the paramilitaries that in other parts of the world there are people
watching." 
|