|
The nation's biggest polluter isn't a corporation. It's the Pentagon.
Every year the Department
of Defense churns out more than 750,000 tons of hazardous waste--more
than the top three chemical companies combined.
Yet the military remains largely exempt from compliance with most
federal and state environmental laws. And in 1998 Congress shielded
the Pentagon from having to pay out environmental fines and penalties
when it gets caught violating the few laws that do govern the military's
conduct, such as the Superfund Act. This has led lawyer Jonathan
Turley, director of the Environmental Crimes Project at George
Washington University, to call the Pentagon the nation's "premier
environmental villain."
The EPA estimates that the total
liability for the cleanup of toxic military sites will exceed $350
billion, or five times the Superfund liability of private industry.
The Clinton administration didn't spend nearly enough to begin cleaning
up these sites and didn't keep a very close eye on how the Pentagon
spent the money it got. During the Clinton presidency, the Defense
Department spent only $3.5 billion a year cleaning up toxic military
sites--much of that on studies, not actual work. In 1998, the Defense
Science Review Board, a federal advisory committee set up to provide
independent advice to the secretary of defense, looked at the problem
and concluded that the Pentagon had no clear environmental cleanup
policy, goals or program.
If the Clinton program was chintzy, the Bush plan is downright
penurious. While Bush aims to boost overall Pentagon spending by
$14.2 billion, the administration would slash its environmental
remediation program, overseen by the
Office of Environmental Cleanup and the Defense
Environmental Restoration Program, by more than 7.5 percent.
Moreover, the Bush defense plan calls for "new rounds of base closures"
to "shape the military more efficiently." Efficiency is usually
a code word for sidestepping environmental rules. And that's exactly
what the Bush plan aims to do by slashing the "the rules and regulations
that now govern the process." The problem is that most of the sites
the Bush crowd is anxious to transfer into private or state hands
are old bombing and training grounds.
These sites, which total more than 50 million acres, are among
the most insidious and dangerous legacies left by the military.
They are strewn with toxic bomb fragments, unexploded munitions,
buried hazardous waste, fuel dumps, open pits filled with debris,
and burn piles. An internal EPA memo from 1998 warned of the looming
problem: "As measured by acres, and probably as measured by number
of sites, ranges and buried munitions represent the largest cleanup
program in the United States."
But the Pentagon dragged its feet, earning a stern rebuke in 1999
from the EPA's assistant administrator, Tim Fields. "For many reasons,"
Fields said, "it appears that closed, transferred and transferring
military ranges are not being adequately addressed in a manner consistent
with accepted environmental or explosive safety standards and practices."
A new report released on April 9 by the Government
Accounting Office exposes the problem in stark terms. The GAO
charges that the Pentagon doesn't even have an accurate inventory
of its training sites or the kind and amount of munitions used on
them. Desperate to keep most of its budget set aside for acquisitions,
the Pentagon typically has lied about how much it will cost to clean
up the mess on its training grounds. In its fiscal year 2000 budget
request, the Defense Department estimated the total liability for
dealing with these problems at $14 billion. But the GAO investigators
uncovered another internal Pentagon estimate, which places the figure
at more than $100 billion. The Navy, for example, has failed to
disclose the cost of handling its obsolete nuclear reactors and
mounting radioactive waste, which could alone total more than $13.5
billion.
When a site gets too polluted, the Pentagon has chosen simply to
close it down and turn it over to another federal agency. Over the
past couple of decades, the Pentagon has transferred more than 16
million acres, often with little or no remediation. The former bombing
areas have been turned into wildlife refuges, city and state parks,
golf courses, landfills, airports and shopping malls.
Serious contamination of streams, soil and groundwater is a problem
at nearly every military training ground. The sites are often saturated
with heavy metals and other pollutants as well as unexploded ordnance.
The GAO list of the kinds of unexploded munitions left behind on
many training sites reads like a catalogue for a Middle East arms
show: "hand grenades, rockets, guided missiles, projectiles, mortars,
rifle grenades, and bombs."
Many of these former training grounds are located near growing
communities. In fact, the recently closed Lowry
Bombing Range outside of Denver is adjacent to a site where
the Cherry Creek School District is planning to construct two schools
and a football stadium. The Forest Service has been forced to close
thousands of acres it has acquired from the Army because of the
presence of live ordnance. In 1999, a hiker in a Colorado national
forest stumbled across an unexploded bomb at Camp
Hale, a site used for training mountain troops during World
War II and since transferred to the Forest
Service. The following year, five live rifle grenades were found
near the same site.
A September 1999 EPA report looked at 61 current or former Pentagon
training bases and found that there had been "unexploded ordnance
incidents" on 24 sites, including "five accidental explosions, which
resulted in two injuries and three fatalities."
Confronting the military about its behavior is never an easy task
because it is shielded from most legal challenges. But grassroots
groups such the Rural Alliance
for Military Accountability in Reno, Nevada have reined in some
of the more egregious practices, such as open burning of toxic munitions
dumps. One of their few consistent allies in Congress has been Sen.
Paul Wellstone (D-Minnesota), who has vowed to make the military
reveal the extent of its environmental liability prior to closing
bases and bombing ranges. "When we close our bases and leave behind
environmental contamination," Wellstone says, "the people who suffer
are almost always people already living in poverty and already struggling
to maintain good health. They do not also need to contend with a
toxic legacy left by the U.S. military." 
|