Donations cover 70% of our operating costs and keep In These Times in print. Please join our community of donors today.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > September 24, 2004

The Promise Keeper

By Brian Cook

It’s no revelation that the “perception managers” giving our reporters their daily bread from the White House and Pentagon are old hands at the art of euphemism, having long ago taken to heart Humpty Dumpty’s dictum that when “masters” use a word, it means exactly what they choose it to mean—“neither more nor less.”

Yet language remains a fickle mistress, whose in-built ambiguities and tendency toward multiple meanings make it a slave to no man. So it’s instructive to examine those instances when language’s eccentricities send the spin masters—themselves subservient to state secrecy—stumbling and spilling the beans.

In the lead-up to the Iraq war, Pentagon planners managed to catch themselves before dubbing the mission “Operation Iraqi Liberation,” presumably when some officer noted that the mission’s acronym (OIL) might suggest an ulterior motive. They’d obviously learned from the post-9/11 mission-naming debacle, when the Pentagon code-named the plan to bomb Afghanistan “Operation Infinite Justice.” The American Muslim community cried out that only Allah was capable of this task. (Ever reluctant to offend the sensibilities of those they are about to target with cruise missiles, the Pentagon changed the name to “Operation Enduring Freedom.”)

But in his latest book, Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle, In These Times Contributing Editor Slavoj Zizek argues that the name “Infinite Justice” holds a disconcerting truth, one fitting for a war waged against an abstract noun. As Bush himself recently blurted out to the chagrin of his handlers, there is no way to win the war on terror, so the battle will continue to move from front to front, stretching from here to eternity. (A similar ambiguity exists in the replacement of “Infinite Justice,” it being apparent that John Ashcroft has found the task of “Enduring Freedom” far too taxing for his imprisoned mind.)

Such thoughts arise when listening to President Bush’s stump speech, now playing in a swing state near you. Having been reeducated by his handlers, the president is back on message regarding America’s “war on terror.” The emotional climax occurs when Bush regales the faithful with his remembrances from Ground Zero, in particular the moment of male bonding he shared with a group of hard-hatted workers who chanted at him: “Whatever it takes.”

The gruff manliness of the phrase obviously appeals to Bush, so much so that he repeats it later in the speech, telling the crowd, “I will never relent in defending America, whatever it takes.” This repetition elicits the loudest cheers of approval from his backers—terrifying, when you consider we are not six months past an uncensored glimpse of the logic of “whatever it takes” at work in Abu Ghraib.

Of all the dangerous beliefs held by this White House, the most damaging has been its steadfast insistence that noble ends are justified by any means. Thus, to achieve the admirable goal of bringing Saddam Hussein to justice, the Bush administration lied to and misled its citizens, spied on members of the United Nations and breached the U.N. Charter that had been the bedrock of international law for over half a century. In its attempts to capture and interrogate terrorists, the administration has laid waste to the Bill of Rights, tacitly approved the use of torture and established an illegal concentration camp at Guantánamo Bay.

Americans have grown accustomed to cynically dismissing campaign promises peddled by politicians on the stump as pure pablum. But take Bush at his word. He’s a promise keeper. If reelected, he won’t relent in pursing this never-ending war on terror by any means necessary. More draconian legislation, more unlawful, unilateral action, more electrodes attached to the genitals of prisoners of war. Whatever it takes.

Brian Cook is an associate editor at In These Times.

More information about Brian Cook
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    American citizens have always been somewhat wary of those with power, and have long recognized an official habit of bending the truth.  When people start to accept egregious lies involving their lives and their well-being and even come to expect that sort of thing from elected officials it can only mean that the death of “democracy” is nigh. 

    I know that I am one of many who wishes that George Orwell were alive today.

    Posted by a kullar on Sep 24, 2004 at 11:58 PM

    I am almost hopeless.  Millions and millions of Americans cannot tell the difference between right and wrong when the evidence is so clear.  What gives me some hope is that articles like this are not yet censored. 
    I wonder when Nazi Germany started to censor opinions against their state.  Might that be the next step for Bush?  What about just nuking the whole world?  Then no “evil-doers and terrorists” will be alive.  Of course, then Bush would not exist, but I doubt he and his cabal can make that logical connection.  Colin Powell could, but he would have to follow orders, so it wouldn’t matter anyway. 

    Thanks, inthesetimes.com!

    Posted by Tom on Sep 25, 2004 at 9:36 PM

    FUHRER MORE YEARS!!!

    My guess is that the spin doctors infecting the White House studied the ways to manipulate the populace by the master Josef Goebbels.

    i see no real difference between what happened in Germany in the mid-1930’s and what is taking place today in America.

    When the large majority of Americans know more about their local sports team than what is going on in their government at the local, state and espeically the federal level, then they receive the
    type of administration they deserve.

    Unfortunately, the rest of us receive the same screwing.

    Posted by Greg Bacon on Sep 28, 2004 at 5:00 AM

    Republi-Con Artist (def.) Someone in a particular political party who believes they can fool all the people all of the time...especially if a cowed news media aids and abets.

    Neo-Con Artist (def.) A master-level Republi-Con Artist who seeks to “fool all the people all of the time” and pass it off as somehow helping the people...while at the same time the people are having their pockets and brains picked. (see Serial Spinner, Master Magician, Karl Rove, Moriarty, every Neo-Con Artist mentioned in Brian Cook’s “The Promise Keeper,” entire list of Who’s Who in the Republicon Party).

    Republi-cancer (def) an often fatal disease associated with falling for the the Republi-Con Artist and Neo-Con Artist spin. Causes Brain Rot, medically speaking. Only known cure is “The Truth.” WARNING: Republi-cancer is contagious and spreads rapidly if anti-toxin not administered immediately following exposure. Often leads to death and destruction. (see “Iran: Another Ground Zero?”, 9/11 report, Iraq War, AID’s funding, Medicare, Halliburton, Oil Cartels, etc., etc.) (Note: a comprehensive list is available in 666-page appendix). WARNING: If you spot a Neo-Con Artist, cover your ears and immediately contact your local “Truth” officials so the Republi-cancer contagion can be contained. Quarantine protocols will be stringently observed. Do not, repeat, do not try to converse with a Neo-Con Artist or your head might spin completely off.

    Posted by Paul Sorrells on Sep 29, 2004 at 1:29 AM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Brian Cook
Popular Discussions