Culture > December 13, 2004

A Dubious Doc

By Eartha Melzer

Just before the election, a film about Iraq hit art house theaters around the country. Voices of Iraq claimed to be a groundbreaking film in which “150 DV cameras [are] distributed across Iraq for the Iraqi people to show the world who they are and what Iraq will be.”

The results? People seem happy that Saddam is gone and optimistic that, if the United States stays in Iraq, democracy will prevail. They seem unafraid of bombs going off nearby. People say Saddam funded al Qaeda. Former Iraqi political prisoners are shown laughing off the stories of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib—what Arab man wouldn’t want a female American soldier to play with his penis?

The film begins with shaky handheld footage but the production values increase dramatically as talk turns to the horrors perpetrated by Saddam Hussein—extended sequences of beatings and dismemberment obviously shot using a tripod not supplied by the producers of this film.

So how was this film made?

Voices of Iraq was promoted as a project in which “thousands of ordinary Iraqis become filmmakers” as the cameras are passed hand to hand and—amazingly—all returned to the filmmakers. But Archie Drury, the Gulf War vet and actor who went to Iraq with the cameras, told me that he actually shot some of the footage himself.

Drury also said that the Iraq Foundation was “extremely helpful” to him as he tried to figure out how to get around and who to give the cameras to. The foundation also supplied the torture footage.

The Iraq Foundation, based in Washington, is funded by the State Department and the National Endowment for Democracy.

Not surprisingly, Drury got uncommon access to Iraqis and Iraqi leaders favored by the U.S. government. Among the notables interviewed, but not identified, is Sharif Ali, the cousin of Iraq’s last king. Drury also interviewed a Sheik Aku Bezei, a man he says was the most powerful tribal leader in Fallujah. On November 6, a Sheik Bezei was killed for collaborating with American forces.

Drury says that his commanding general from Desert Storm put him in touch with General Mattis, fighting in the Sunni Triangle, and General Amos of the Air Wing, and that he exchanged e-mails with these generals as he planned his trip.

In an interview in Movie Maker magazine, another of the film’s producers, Martin Kunnert, said: “Getting a theatrical release for a documentary film is still rare. We lucked out in that our distributor, Magnolia Pictures, [which also put out Control Room and Capturing the Friedmans] was eager to get the film in theaters before the presidential election.”

A call to Magnolia Pictures in New York was answered by a man who, lowering his voice when asked about Voices of Iraq, whispered, “Nobody here wanted to release this and we didn’t do any of the promotion on it. [Mark] Cuban steamrolled us on this.” (Cuban owns Magnolia Pictures, the Dallas Mavericks and much more.)

Jeff Riechert, the Magnolia Pictures contact for Voices of Iraq, said that while his company is technically distributing the film, Manning, Selvage & Lee (MS&L) is coordinating the publicity. MS&L has the public affairs contract for the U.S. Army. The firm’s revamp of the Army’s image with the reality TV-style “Army of One” ad campaign is credited with enabling the Army to meet its recruiting goals after a long slump. According to MS&L Managing Director Joe Gleason, he and his colleagues also deliver key targeted messages about the war in Iraq to specific constituencies.

Was the left-leaning art house crowd one of those constituencies? Is the government hiring documentary filmmakers to propagandize the U.S. population?

Nobody involved with the film is willing to say who initially put up the money for the film or how they ended up represented by the Army’s PR firm.

On November 13, as Marines stormed Fallujah, the Marines’ Birthday Ball in San Francisco honored Drury for his work on Voices of Iraq, for “going back and living up to the standard of a Marine.”

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  This “documentary” has to be at least as objective as Moore’s was, don’t y’all think?

  Posted by anyway on Dec 13, 2004 at 10:19 AM

  Any documentary is subject to intense scrutiny.  What is nice is this film is showing the positive effects (maybe) as opposed to the press’ viewpoint of all the bad that’s happening.  Although I believe that it’s not as bad as the press is making it out to be, I do believe the picture isn’t as rosy as the Bush administration makes it out to be.  Somewhere in the middle lies the truth, hopefully this film can help us achieve this balance.

  Posted by giantsox on Dec 13, 2004 at 11:42 AM

  I somehow fail to see how propaganda from one side of a discussion can “balance out” propaganda from the other.  Lies remain lies, and half-truths remain the worst kind of lies.  Especially if such things are subsidized by my tax dollars.

  Anyone remember when the Kuwaiti princess lied before congress about Iraqi troops removing babies from incubators?  The Pentagon had something to do with that as well.

  But then again, I voted against the fascist junta, so I’m biased against the empire, and my comments should be considered in that context.

  Posted by J Powers on Dec 13, 2004 at 11:57 AM

  All I’m saying is that two people can see the exact same actions and draw two entirely different perception of the events, it doesn’t mean they’re lying it just means they saw them differently.

  Like Bush, I don’t see him as fitting the description of a fascist junta but obviously you do.  Oh and my comments are a little biased to.

  Posted by giantsox on Dec 13, 2004 at 2:03 PM

  I will be very interested to see what kind of documentary films emerge from Iraq once the fighting has passed. When that will be I don’t dare to predict, but eventually, independent filmmakers from around the world will be able to enter the country and gather footage from a broader sampling of Iraqis than at present. As for objectivity, I wonder if such a thing really exists at all, but the added diversity of offerings may give a clearer picture. The challenge will be identifying the few groups that don’t have an obvious axe to grind in advance, as we’re stuck with at present.

  Referring to Michael Moore, when I read the article it occured to me that the film may be aimed at inoculating the public against his book featuring letters from US troops whose tone are said to be critical of the administration. I haven’t yet read the book nor seen the film, it’s just speculation at this point.

  Posted by Kuya on Dec 13, 2004 at 11:27 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 23 posts.

Member Login

Also by Eartha Melzer

• Trafficking in Politics
  Bush's strong rhetoric on sex slavery masks policy failures.
• A Dubious Doc