Bill Ayers speaks out! An In These Times exclusive.

In These Times

PrintDiscuss
Views » February 18, 2005

Debtor Nation

By Susan J. Douglas

The financial institutions that issue credit cards are major Washington lobbyists and, thus, virtually unregulated.

As the president and his corporate patrons seek to turn the management of Americans’ retirements—a.k.a., our “golden years”—over to those highly trustworthy, humanitarian types on Wall Street, we should look at another model of how corporate America helps people manage their finances—the credit card companies—to get a glimpse of where we are headed.

Here are some of my recent favorite credit card gambits: The amount of time my credit card company gives me to turn around and pay the bill has shrunk to about two and a half weeks—otherwise, I’m late. The late fee I pay even if the check arrives one day late has, within two years, gone from about $20 to about $40. They have begun posting a payment due date that is a Sunday—when, of course, they don’t do business—and if the check arrives Monday, you are docked the late fee plus all the interest. The interest rates, given what the rest of us get paid on our savings accounts and CDs, would make Shylock blush and certainly revive the word “usurious.” Dare to miss a payment, and the company may raise your interest rate up to an outrageous 25 percent. And let’s not forget that the financial institutions that issue credit cards are major Washington lobbyists and, thus, virtually unregulated.

All of this and more was recently exposed in “The Secret History of the Credit Card,” produced by “Frontline” and the New York Times. Here are some underreported doozies from the show: Through a policy called “universal default,” if you are late with a payment to someone else—say your mortgage company—your credit card company can raise your interest rates automatically because they feel you have become a riskier client. How do they know if you’ve been late on a car payment? They can now monitor, on a daily basis, your financial transactions and your credit rating.

Always, always, they are trolling for and sticking it to the most financially vulnerable; just as in Bush’s budget, those in the most financially precarious positions are the ones made to pay the most. Millions of people already in financial hot water are solicited to accept yet more credit cards. The companies also set the minimum monthly payments so low that consumers could easily be in debt for the rest of their lives.

According to “Frontline,” since there is no federal government regulation of late payment fees, “the amount of revenue the companies generate from fees … has doubled” in the last 10 years. Some predict that late fees will go to $50 within the year. The companies can also change your interest rate at will—they just have to give you 15 days’ notice. And why are so many of these card companies, like Citibank or Bank USA, based in places like South Dakota or Delaware? Because these states (unlike some others) have no caps on interest rates.

Approximately 10 companies control nearly all credit card accounts, and they have their own individual and collective lobbyists working the Hill daily to make sure there is no investigation into the industry. One thing they also want to ensure is their continued ability to violate your privacy by sharing your financial information with telemarketers or other third parties, even if you object. According to U.S. PIRG, they have also been lobbying hard to change the bankruptcy laws so that it would be harder to qualify for Chapter 7 “fresh start” bankruptcy; instead, people would have to go into a Chapter 13 “5-year repayment plan” program, which, not surprisingly, would include unpaid credit cards. Both Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) and John Kerry have proposed legislation that would require greater disclosure about what it really costs to carry this debt and that would prohibit the arbitrary increasing of interest rates. Given who controls Congress, don’t hold your breath.

In part because of these shenanigans, the Kiplinger newsletter reports, “the rate at which people file for bankruptcy has increased 40 percent over the past 10 years and now totals 8.6 out of every 1,000 Americans.” Older Americans, Kiplinger predicts, will lead the way. Burdened by taking care of children and aging parents in middle age, and then confronted by escalating health and medical bills while on a fixed—or, if Bush has his way, declining—income in old age, it will be senior citizens whose bankruptcy rates will soar.

The Bush version of Social Security will be just like this. It will further impoverish the poor, the working classes and women and be filled with hidden scams that benefit the financial institutions at our expense. Given that most Americans hate their credit card companies—the industry has a very high complaint rate—opponents of Bush’s efforts to privatize Social Security might do well to use the industry as a predictor of what is to come.

Just imagine—the same financial interests that gouge you now, have indecipherable rules in their microscopic agreements, enjoy no regulation and can do whatever they want to screw the average American will soon control our retirements. Priceless.

Susan J. Douglas is a professor of communications at the University of Michigan and author of The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How it Has Undermined Women.

More information about Susan J. Douglas

  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    We cannot let Social Security be compromised by the current corrupt administration.

    Posted by pick of the litter on Feb 18, 2005 at 9:46 AM

    The solution is so very simple. Learn to live within your means. Thus spending 90% of your income will lead to wealth building, spending 100%+ will lead to indentured servitude (is cable worth it? A newer car? A better TV?). CHOOSE.

    Blaming others for our own poor financial choices is like the fatties that eat too much and exercise too little. Sure we can blame the tv and advertisers, but why not learn to EAT LESS and EXERCISE MORE? Sure beats all this whining. . .

    Posted by liveWIthinYourMeans on Feb 18, 2005 at 10:32 AM

    liveWIthinYourMeans,

    Responsibility is important, but I think you’re dismissing the effect of outside influence. Most people, it seems to me, are too susceptible to advertising and suggestion. Because people want to have the shiny new car, or the giant TV, etc., and that’s what they think is important. So I agree with you, and I believe you’ve made the same point elsewhere on the site, but you should understand that its a double-sided coin.
    Taking responsibility is only half the solution, the other half is trying to get rid of the insidious advertising that plagues us. My opinion is that business and corporations have taken control, albeit subtly, of the American conscious.  I’m still not sure what to think of the Social Security problem, if in fact there is one, but I do know Bush’s track record for honesty, so my instinct is usually the opposite of a Bush idea is the right way to go.

    Posted by WoolOverTheEyes on Feb 18, 2005 at 1:37 PM

    Actually, there’s an even simpler solution:

    Enforce U.S. immigration law by deporting illegals and fining and/or imprisoning the law-breaking employers who use them for cheap labor.

    Just imagine if every single person working in the U.S. were a legal citizen. That means every single worker would have Social Security taxes taken out of their paycheck, as opposed to so many illegals in the U.S. being paid off the books, which, of course, means their wages aren’t being taxed. There’d me MORE than enough to fund Social Security benefits, and it would also pull so many legal U.S. citizens out of the unemployment ranks, because they’d be filling jobs occupied by illegals.

    So, in a nutshell, by (gosh forbid!) actually enforcing immigration law, the U.S. could fix Social Security and put a heck of a dent in the unemployment figures. But this common-sense solution will never pass, because the unAmerican employers who hire illegals for higher profits and the politicians who bend over for them have got it too good the way it is now.

    Posted by Kevin Collins on Feb 18, 2005 at 1:47 PM

    Learn to live within your means.by liveWIthinYourMeans

    Just like those fiscally responsible, self responsibility touting Repubs in Congress and the White House!!

    And what is with this unrelenting attack against fat people by obviously the same poster?

    Posted by Liberal AND Proud on Feb 18, 2005 at 2:33 PM

  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 40 posts.

Appeared in the March 14, 2005 Issue
Also by Susan J. Douglas
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS

Popularity

In These Times is published in Chicago. We’ve been around since 1976, fighting for workers’ rights, corporate accountability and progressive government. In other words, a better world. more

Copyright © 2008 In These Times