Bill Ayers speaks out! An In These Times exclusive.

In These Times

PrintDiscuss
Supplementary » July 6, 2005

Unapologetic Radical

By Laura S. Washington

James Weinstein: The Legacy

Not a Dead Ender
By G. William Domhoff
Old Terrain, New Insights
By Ron Radosh
Muckraker By Studs Terkel
Creative Devotion
By David Moberg
Unapologetic Radical
By Laura Washington
The Historian We Need
By Michael Kazin
Guts and Tenacity
By Scott McLemee
Ambiguious Legacy
By James B. Gilbert
Throw Off the Saddles and Dare to Think By Edward "Buzz" Palmer
Last Request By Melissa Byrne
To a Friend
By Adrian Bleifuss Prados

Jim Weinstein was the lefty’s lefty, an unabashed socialist. But he was no ideologue. He was an intellectual who participated in, observed and dissected most every major twist and turn of the American left.

He was a public intellectual who believed that compromise and winning were possible. He had no truck with blind ideology.

In this Red State New World, moderation can be a curse. Still, Weinstein was an unapologetic radical, yet a radical who embraced the system. In politics, he argued, being effective is more important than being right. In The Long Detour, he wrote, “Choosing the outsider’s route … is to leave the game—or at best, to stand on the sidelines as ultimately feckless kibitzers.”

He held no patience for political poseurs.

He was so right. In the 2000 presidential election, Weinstein unmasked what would become a feckless but fatal folly. His essay, “Nader: Why I’m Not Voting for Ralph,” netted a slew of canceled subscriptions for In These Times. If only more of us had listened.

In the last year of his life, Weinstein was very, very busy: toiling away at the finishing touches of a very mainstream concept—a think tank that would harvest the best ideas of the left. Meanwhile he was deploying chunks of his family’s New York real estate holdings into progressive campaigns around the nation, from Dennis Kucinich to Barack Obama to Melissa Bean, a fresh-faced dragon slayer who knocked off the veteran conservative U.S. Rep. Phil Crane of Wauconda, northwest of Chicago. A Crane minion huffed that Bean was taking a $2,000 contribution from “a communist.”

Weinstein abandoned communism for socialism in 1956. “This is not only not true, but kind of ludicrous after 50 years,” he told the Chicago Tribune.

The prolific author was proudest of his final tome, The Long Detour. But when it came to hardheaded, pragmatism Weinstein never took the shortcut.

Laura S. Washington, an In These Times senior editor, teaches journalism at DePaul University and is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times.

More information about Laura S. Washington
Appeared in the August 1, 2005 Issue
Also by Laura S. Washington
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS

Popularity

In These Times is published in Chicago. We’ve been around since 1976, fighting for workers’ rights, corporate accountability and progressive government. In other words, a better world. more

Copyright © 2008 In These Times