Features » August 25, 2006

SDS, New and Improved

SDS reforms at University of Chicago convention.

By Adam Doster

Pat Korte (at computer) hopes to resurrect SDS. (Credit: Thomas Good)

Over the first weekend of August, more squirrels were scampering through the Quads at the University of Chicago than students or professors. But from Aug. 4 to 7, students adorned with political pins and T-shirts transformed the drab front hall of Cobb Hall into a scene reminiscent of a political rally. For the first time in 37 years, the newly re-formed Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) exchanged ideas and strategies at a national convention, one that contained both contention and hope for the modern student left.

Beginning in 1960 and lasting through the next nine years, SDS pioneered the teach-in as a means to examine and protest the Vietnam War and organized an estimated 100,000 students. The sectarian downfall of SDS at their national convention in Chicago in 1969 led to the disintegration of almost 200 active chapters and created a void on college campuses that many think remains unfilled. “The demise of SDS was so disastrous that it left many suspicious of any form of a national organization,” says Maurice Isserman, a history professor at Hamilton College, former member of SDS and the author of three books about the New Left.

But hope springs eternal. In January, a group of students and SDS veterans, led by Pat Korte, then a senior at Stonington High School in Connecticut, and SDS’s first president Alan Haber, decided to re-establish the group. In just eight months, more than 1,000 students registered as members and 150 local chapters have started up.

The 100 or so students who attended the convention shared war stories from local campaigns. Chapters from various schools, such as Pace University, the University of Central Florida and the New School, also organized diverse workshops on broader topics ranging from “The Student Syndicalist and Unionist Movement” to “White Privilege and Gentrification,” allowing members to exchange tactics and organizing methods. The most passionate exchanges, however, were reserved for the larger brainstorming session on how to develop a provisional national structure for the group, which included discussions on its purpose, voting processes and maintaining both democracy and the decentralization of power.

By practicing participatory democracy, direct action and chapter autonomy, the new generation of SDS organizers has embraced many of the idealistic values expressed in its predecessor’s seminal manifesto, the Port Huron Statement. Members hope to create a viable, multi-issue movement that will effect radical social change and reinvigorate the student left. “SDS is a valuable organization because it gives students an opportunity to define and direct their own movement,” says Korte. “It also allows us to build a movement that will utilize dual power, create alternative institutions and is modeled after a society we collectively envision.”

Why did the new crop of activists choose to revive SDS instead of starting a fresh organization? Despite its complex history, they believe that, as activists fighting for more democracy in the world, the name “Students for a Democratic Society” more precisely expresses their mission than any alternative. The revival of the name also attracted the attention of various SDS veterans who have created a post-graduate division known as the Movement for a Democratic Society (MDS). MDS hopes to develop a concurrent program specializing in legal defense and radical education that will provide knowledge to the new SDSers.

“The original SDS did not have access to elders who made mistakes,” says New York City regional organizer and MDS member Tom Good. “If we are careful not to finger wag but only to advise, that knowledge will be an asset.”

Finally, members think that restarting SDS provides a tacit connection to the important and comparable battles their predecessors waged. “SDS offers a sense of long continuity of the struggle,” says Haber. “Students sometimes don’t have much perspective and SDS allows us to build a sense of how it’s all connected.”

But some are skeptical of SDS’s revitalization. While excited by the group’s desire to “develop a deep analysis of the root causes of the crises and catastrophes we face,” former SDS member and Weatherman dissident (and now University of Illinois at Chicago education professor) Bill Ayers thinks that nostalgia for the first major student movement can be detrimental. “There’s nothing more depressing than longing for a ship that’s already left the shore,” says Ayers.

Isserman is leery as well, arguing that appropriating the name and identity of a group from the past is contradictory for an organization modeling itself after the pioneers of the New Left. “[The first] SDS attempted to re-imagine what it meant to be on the left in America,” he says. “They were not trying to turn back to earlier models.”

To organize a radical social movement today, SDS will also have to overcome its stigma as a white, male-dominated organization. This issue arose at the convention when the People of Color Caucus produced a statement of constructive criticism to the overwhelmingly white attendees, indicating that each of its members had felt alienated at some point during the weekend.

Lehigh University senior Hannah Behrmann thinks that the group will fail if multiple voices are not heard. “Diversity isn’t the greatest at this conference, but it is only the first one,” Behrmann says. “It will be very important in the coming months that the organization pays very close attention to the make-up of its leaders.”

• subscribe to print magazine

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Why not YDS?  isn’t this new SDS pretty much offering the same thing?  why do we need yet another mildly-impactful, progressive youth organization, and especially one with such baggage as this?  i find it unimaginative.  why not breathe life into YDS?

  Posted by n.e.s.t.a. on Aug 25, 2006 at 9:50 AM

  Thanks for the thoughtful post Nesta - the reason is that SDS is a very diverse group.  YDS has some great people (Jason Schulman and Lucas Shapiro come to mind) but many of us in SDS and MDS are not from the Democratic Socialist tradition.  I myself am an
  anarcho-syndicalist (I am a wobbly from the NYC GMB).  We also have a number of anarchists, Greens, PDAs and others.  In short, we have a broader constituency.  That said we are grateful to YDS for getting us space at the University of Chicago! 
  Solidarity,
  Tom Good, SDS New York

  Posted by tmgood on Aug 25, 2006 at 10:56 AM

  thank you, tom.  just the answer i was looking for.  thanks for your work.

  peace.

  Posted by n.e.s.t.a. on Aug 25, 2006 at 12:24 PM

  Interesting news. I left the States for Europe two weeks after the first election of George Bush. Here in Spain almost everyone who is not a large business owner considers him or herself a “worker”. I´ m not a member of a union but my contract as an executive secretary for a large, multinational insurance firm was written according to a “convenio” established for workers in the insurance industry . white and blue collar.

  I´ve learned the difference between intellectual deconstructionism and what really was happening in 1968. When somebody is called a fascist here in Spain it´s because he really is a Fascist with credentials.

  When the Spanish public protested the war spontaneously, the transit workers declared a one-day slow-down to protest against the war, maintaining a few buses on critical routes as a public service. The employess at my bank decided that everything should really stop, at least for ten minutes, and they walked out, locked the door of a branch in the heart of the Barcelona business district and sat down in the middle of the busiest street to stop the limited bus service for ten minutes. Traffic waited ten minutes, drivers and passengers cheering the well-dressed protestors. Nobody was fired or even reprimanded. It was considered a patriotic act and was positively noted in a wide range of local and national newspapers.

  If the SDS does it right this time, the white collar employees and the small business people will see that democracy and solidarity are not phrases ato be thrown around at at a cocktail party only during “liberal” years , will stop begging for tax cuts and start holding the U.S. government responsibile for where their taxes go.

  Don´t let anybody fool you - national health systems work, and collective bargaining is useful even for a mid-level executive. But there is hard work behind social transformation: hard bargaining, the willingness to share benefits and services and giving up some personal benefits for the commonweal.

  These SDS students must dedicate themselves to studying labor law, environmental and international trade issues, health services and educational reform.

  My friends, colleagues and even some of those certified Fascists here, are a bit bewildered by the current U.S. zeitgeist. “What are they so afraid of?” they ask me time and again. So I pass the question along. There are so many transformations needed to guarantee democracy in the U.S. What are you afraid of?

  JL Barcelona

  Posted by barcelona on Aug 25, 2006 at 3:11 PM

  Congratulations JL, you have the nail on the head. US citizens can scarcely imagine what it is like to live in countries that take social solidarity seriously, and who have actually suffered themselves (as opposed to creating suffering solely for others) at the hands of their own elites. Until the US as a whole, not just students, (who by definition, are a relatively privileged minority), are able to confront the truth about their society and the way their elites treat both US citizens and the rest of the world, there will never be any change, notwithstanding the good intentions of those resuccitating SDS.

  A key example is the falling incomes of the US working class (by which I mean the majority of those who must work for wages or salary). Where is the outrage? Where are the campaigns? Where is the sense that US citizens even want to hold their elites to account?  The state of organised labour in the US is absolutely pitiful, the worst in the OECD actually. But no-one seems to care, and the consequences are scarcely remarked upon. IMHO it is yet another reason why it is always bad to be a citiizen of empire, rather than of a nation state.

  Posted by Jane Doe on Aug 27, 2006 at 5:11 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 7 posts.

Also featured The Good War on Terror
The Prairie Populist: Byron Dorgan
Examining Irans ties to Hezbollah

Full contents
Previous issues
Subscribe and save!

Also by Adam Doster

• GOP Dirty Tricks 2.0
  Republican officials continue their campaign against "voter fraud"Posted on October 13, 2008
• Change We All Believe In
  Progressive activists, leaders gather in Denver for convention kick-off eventPosted on August 25, 2008
• The Mess is the Message
  Since Hurricane Katrina ravaged the Gulf Coast in 2005, the president's approval… morePosted on August 15, 2008
• Expand the Vote
  The Obama campaign’s voter registration drive could radically alter the electoral map this fallPosted on June 11, 2008
• Sam’s Club Politics
  On a recent episode of the NBC comedy "30 Rock," the cutthroat… morePosted on May 30, 2008