Your donations make In These Times affordable for all readers, including students and readers with low incomes. Please donate today.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Culture > March 30, 2007

Boomsday: Bankrupt Satire

By Jessica Clark

Tags   

Libertarians are a strange lot. Their targets often seem reasonable; their solutions myopic and partial. So it goes with Christopher Buckley’s Boomsday, a sub-Swiftian sendup of the looming threat of an overwhelming federal deficit, set in the carnivorous confines of D.C.’s wonkscape.

Cassandra Devine is a heroine for our spin-crazy times—or actually, for five years from now, when the first wave of Baby Boomers will be eligible to retire, an event dubbed “Boomsday.” A “strategic communicator” for excessive executives, pesticide manufacturers and mink-farmers, by night, the twenty-something blogger imbibes Red Bulls and Ayn Rand in equal measure and sets her sights on the greed of those determined to make her “Generation Whatever”—Gen W—peers foot the bill for their golden years. Her modest proposal? Offer senior citizens a reprieve from estate taxes in return for their voluntary suicide at retirement—a publicity ploy that she terms a “meta-political device.”

Cassandra’s stunt, supposedly meant to prompt discussion of responsible government spending, spins out of control when it hits the whirling fan of media attention. Her cause is helped along by the ministrations of her P.R. flak boss, support from an ambitious senator, and the high-profile disapproval of an unctuous pro-life minister who heads up the Society for the Protection of Every Ribonucleic Molecule (SPERM). Cassandra’s excitable blog followers stage riots at gated communities, laud her call for a tax revolt, and cheer on her campaign for resource-hogging “wrinklies” to “voluntarily transition.” Elaborate hijinks ensue, and she ends up on the lam, a refashioned rebel with a cause, and a Blackberry.

Buckley—son of the Buckley of National Review fame—favors a reductively Freudian brand of character development. Cassandra’s fury stems from her Beemer-driving father’s decision to invest her college fund into his tanking dot-com. Both the self-indulgent liberal senator, Randolph K. Jepperson, and his nemesis, the rotund and foppish evangelist, Gideon Payne, seek power as a response to the disapproval of their overbearing mothers. Such devices allow Buckley to generate sympathy for even his most unlikable characters.

When not following psychological compulsions, Boomsday’s dramatis personae are driven by generational dictates. Born in 1952, Buckley slags his own generation as unrepentant hypocrites, hooked on perks and entitled to the point of narcissism. As Cassandra’s boss, Terry Tucker, explains, “Everyone sells out. Boomers just figured out how to make it an entire industry.” But this doesn’t let the Gen W crowd off the hook. Borrowing from the theories of psychologist Jean Twenge, author of Generation Me, Buckley sketches the rising cohort as cynical yet strangely easy to manipulate. Late in the novel, as Jepperson launches a run for president based on his appeal to the twenty-somethings, Cass advises him to adopt “Why Not?” as his campaign slogan. Soon after, bolstered by focus groups, she tells him the best way to court the youth vote is to tell the president to “shut the fuck up” in the midst of a campaign debate. Are readers supposed to swallow the idea that all it takes to woo the iPod crowd is a shrug and the staged authenticity of an expletive?

Still, while his characters’ motivations might be simplistic—as befits a writer convinced that each of us operates primarily from self-interest—Buckley can’t be faulted for lack of inventiveness. His baroque plotting largely manages to entertain while indicting the usual suspects: insatiable businessmen, corrupt priests, spineless politicians, amoral lobbyists and strong-arming pimps. A former speechwriter for George Bush Sr., and editor of Forbes FYI, Buckley is a whiz with snarky acronyms, and has an insider’s understanding of media’s levers and buttons.

Buckley’s publishers share his interest in the well-chosen publicity op. Boomsday is the first product of a boutique imprint at Hachette Book Group called Twelve. The conceit is that it will publish only one book a month, devoting extraordinary resources to promoting each title. “We strive to publish the singular book, by authors who have a unique perspective and compelling authority,” says Twelve’s mission statement, “Works that explain our culture; that illuminate, inspire, provoke, and entertain. We seek to establish communities of conversation surrounding our books.” And who will be speaking to whom to what end? A look at the first few authors tells the story: along with Buckley, there’s Christopher Hitchens holding forth on the poison that is religion, and John McCain on “great decisions and the extraordinary people who made them.” In other words, Twelve is home to the self-styled maverick, the blowhard contrarian beloved by the corporate media. Bloggers will have a field day.

Which brings us to the crux of the matter: Boomsday is not just another hard-working satire, struggling to keep up with the absurdity of the era. It’s a stunt within a stunt, a book about making a splash that itself is a cannonball into the deep end. You could even call it a “meta-political device,” designed to re-prime the pump for a debate over Social Security privatization—a gambit that failed spectacularly despite Bush Jr.’s best efforts. Seen from that perspective, it just becomes tiresome.

Buckley depends on the most dire prognostications for Social Security, which, according to moderate and progressive economists, is not “in crisis” at all. Of course, he is exaggerating for effect: his vision of a bankrupt administration is an expression of his own disappointment with conservatives’ current direction. In October, he expressed as much in a Washington Monthly article titled “Let’s Quit While We’re Behind”:

Who knew, in 2000, that “compassionate conservatism” meant bigger government, unrestricted government spending, government intrusion in personal matters, government ineptitude, and cronyism in disaster relief? Who knew, in 2000, that the only bill the president would veto, six years later, would be one on funding stem-cell research? A more accurate term for Mr. Bush’s political philosophy might be incontinent conservatism.

According to Buckley, then, the solution is some mixture of financial rectitude and parental responsibility: the government shouldn’t promise benefits it can’t afford to deliver, and the older generation should realize they’re depending on a smaller generation of youngsters to foot the bill for a bulge of retirees. Sounds nice, but it’s an outlook shaped (excuse the reductive character assessment) by Buckley’s up-market milieu.

Simply cutting federal spending won’t help the bulk of Americans, including many Boomers, who aren’t worried that they may have to pay estate taxes, or whining—like Cassandra—that they couldn’t afford to go to Yale. Instead, policy priorities need to be shifted to support those citizens who are caring for their own aging parents, struggling to pay for education, maxing out their credit cards to pay doctor’s bills, sitting on depreciating property and wondering about the stability of their jobs. They are the ones smacked around by the invisible hand, not lifted by it.

The publisher’s PR materials and Boomsday itself make references to Miami Herald columnist and comic novelist Carl Hiaasen as a model satirist—the kind of conversation-starter that they hope to emulate. But Hiaasen is not just a humorist, he’s a humanist. While his heroes and villains are caricatures, his protagonists are real people, dealing with issues like job loss and child support.

Like Buckley, Hiaassen might well target egotistical yuppies who expect government handouts without thought for the next generation. But he’d be equally hard on high-handed D.C. pundits who don’t feel like paying taxes and can’t see why they should be forced to.

Chris Buckley, I’m from Miami. Carl Hiaassen is a hero of mine. And you, sir, are no Carl Hiaasen.

Jessica Clark is the editor-at-large at In These Times and the director of the Future of Public Media project at the Center for Social Media.

More information about Jessica Clark
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Jessica, Carl’s overrated and overhyped and NONE of the Buckleys have EVER been “libertarians.” Ever. Read Master Booeyfuckley’s many attacks on Ayn Rand and Murray Rothbard. The Master who likes to inhale his own gas and was always a Big Government Conservative going back to his Commonweal artice in 1952. ALWAYS.
    I do have to admit that the paragraph you directly quote from Junior
    is entirely accurate. And I will concede that many libertarians and Objectivists ARE boring, just like many lefties. Don’t quit your day job yet.

    Posted by blondemike on Mar 30, 2007 at 12:46 PM

    BIll Buckley is becoming more of a libertarian with his advocacy of legalized drugs and his opposition to war as a government racket. Still like most libertarians he is way on the right. The lib in libertarian is an illusion. To enforce a libertarian social order would require massive state repression. Scratch a Libertarian find a fascist. Such an irony!! But look at fascist sympathizer BM who claims to be a “libertarian/objectivist” whatever that means. I suspect there are many other such individuals as well.

    Posted by cabdriverinchicago on Mar 30, 2007 at 10:36 PM

    Booeyfuckley is NOT for decriminalized drugs, he SUPPORTED the draconian Rockefeller Drug Laws in NY and has never recanted that
    support. His opposition is NOT to the mass murder we call war but only jumping ship because it’s going badly. Unlike YOU, i’ve never advocated the fascist form of socialism and actively supported states
    founded on legal racism like Israel. A libertarian social order means the total absense of initiated force where people are put in jail for opposing
    some official dogma. Even Chomsky wrote me in 89 that laws in Canada trying Zundel were fascist to the core, and you COLOSTOMY
    BAG HEMORRHOIDS FACE Chicago ADVOCATE SUCH LAWS. That
    makes you a HARDCORE FASCIST.

    Posted by blondemike on Mar 31, 2007 at 2:54 PM

    I am only trying to stop fascism in its tracks before it gets to far. Canada doesn’t need Zundel. He is a shit. He violates the rights of Jews to live in peace and not be scapegoated, libeled, or mistreated. Let him suffer. Who told him to go and mess with the Jews in the first place?

    What is initiated force. In the Libertarian world you will need force to suppress the resistance of the poor who won’t even be able to walk down the privatized streets. Maybe a “faith based” charity will subsidize the cost but only if they turn their lives over to the Lord.

    Posted by cabdriverinchicago on Apr 1, 2007 at 7:55 AM

    Chicago, I just refuted you again on the bisexual thread. Zundel NEVER violated ANYONE’S rights. Zundel’s rights WERE violated by the use of STATE force which is the only way rights can violated. Neither the US Bill of Rights nor the Canadian Charter says that if Jewish assholes do not approve of something that that violates their rights. No wonder the average JewIQ is 99 in Israel and less here.

    Posted by blondemike on Apr 1, 2007 at 2:47 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 9 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Jessica Clark
Popular Discussions