Views > April 24, 2007

Poisoning Pets with Industrial Food

Lacking transparency, industry relies on alchemy of pet food to turn its waste into profits

By Terry J. Allen

In New York City’s East Village, a string of Indian restaurants stretches side by side for a block along Sixth Street. The running joke is that tucked behind the row is one kitchen that dishes up the same food for all the restaurants. But while that model makes for urban myth on Sixth Street, it is nearer to corporate reality when it comes to pet foods.

Until a few weeks ago, Americans might have been amused to imagine that—despite the varieties of colors and adorably shaped fishes, bones and jolly little stars—the multitudinous brands of major pet foods come from the same factory kitchen. However, a recall of possibly poisoned cat and dog food revealed that for three months ending on March 6, Canadian-based Menu Foods Income Fund produced ingredients that ended up in 100 brands manufactured in two U.S. plants.

No one knows how many pets ate the tainted chow before companies recalled 60 million cans, pouches, biscuits, kibbles and treats. The Food and Drug Administration listed 250 different flavors of recalled cat food alone.

Adding to the bad taste is that Menu Foods is an income trust, a kind of Canadian tax dodge, sometimes equated with Ponzi schemes. It will be interesting to see how readily that financial structure regurgitates the millions in potential damages.

Menu Foods’ suspect ingredient was 1.7 million pounds of wheat gluten imported from China by Las Vegas-based ChemNutra. ChemNutra’s PR firm admitted that the company had sold the gluten to three other pet-food makers, but told In These Times that confidentiality agreements precluded revealing the names.

The FDA called the companies, names “commercial confidential information,” raising questions not only about the distribution of the wheat gluten, but about the secrecy of the regulatory process itself.

ChemNutra also appears less than transparent. It “has not filed as a Nevada corporation,” reports Las Vegas Review-Journal.com, and California listed its “incorporation status as ‘surrender,’ which means the company has voluntarily surrendered its right to transact business in California.”

But while ChemNutra and Menu Foods may lack corporate pedigrees, the pet food industry they supply boasts top breeds. Three of the five major pet food companies in the United States are subsidiaries of major multinational companies: Nestlé, Del Monte** and Colgate-Palmolive. Other pet food biggies include Procter & Gamble, Mars and Nutro.

These companies’ pet foods rely on industrial food production for most of their ingredients, and industrial food relies on the alchemy of pet food to turn its waste into profits. But let’s be clear: What’s wrong with pet food is not that it contains animal parts such as beaks, intestines, animal necks, feet and undeveloped eggs that finicky Americans reject as icky. After all, Fido’s ancestral diet includes deer carcass and Fluffy is partial to rat parts.

The problem with pet food—whether it’s ground steak or chopped rectum, sawdust or grain filler—is that with FDA approval, it can include ingredients that are putrid, disease-ridden, and filled with the chemicals and pharmaceuticals.

In addition to helping industrial food transform potential garbage, pet food also serves the restaurant industry by buying up tons of used and possibly carcinogenic grease.

And then there is the generous contribution made by pets themselves. The corpses of the 7 million homeless cats and dogs euthanized every year have to go somewhere. Many are sent to rendering plants, which sell their products—you guessed it—to the pet food industry. Some pet food manufacturers deny using rendered pets in cat and dog food, but the industry is secretive. FDA oversight is spottier than a Dalmatian, and, short of DNA testing, who’s to know?

We are not talking chopped liver, here; the stakes are huge. Americans fed their 75 million dogs and 88 million cats almost $16 billion worth of food last year. That amount surpasses the GDP of almost 100 of the world’s 229 countries. The $38.5 billion that Americans spent on pets last year is slightly less than the GDP of Kenya for its 35 million people.

Almost a month after the original recall and five full months after the tainted food was first manufactured, there is still no conclusive evidence about what caused the deaths and illnesses, which some experts predict will mount into the thousands. Wheat gluten is the chief suspect, but why it was toxic is up for debate. The first culprit was a rat poison found by the New York State lab, but the FDA failed to confirm that finding and pointed to melamine, a plastic not known for serious toxicity.

“The system broke down,” said Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) according to the April 6 Washington Post. “It’s not just about contaminated food killing pets, it’s a system that failed.”

But in the end, the system that failed feeds not just our pets, but us, too. Bon appétit.

**CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story incorrectly listed Heinz, instead of Del Monte, as one of the three major U.S. pet food companies that are subisidiaries of major mulitnational corporations. Heinz sold its North American Pet Food business to Del Monte a few years ago.

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Terry Allen says,

  “The problem with pet food—whether it’s ground steak or chopped rectum, sawdust or grain filler—is that with FDA approval...”

  But… we are ignoring the biggest problem here — the FDA itself.

  The “approval” she mentions is largely implicit. I recently read the FDA inspects only ONE PERCENT of the pet food. Within the past year the FDA did a self test and gave itself only a 33 percent grade!  We’re talking HUMAN food here!

  Now I am not one who believes the government should be deeply involved in our individual lives, however, while we’ve been busy passing seat belt and airbag laws, and putting on warning labels and idiot proofing RX bottles, we’ve also been cutting staff at regulatory agencies like the FDA.

  Another result of the FDA test — When they were questioned by FDA agents the majority of foreign companies supplying human food didn’t have anyone who spoke English. That didn’t stop the importation.

  The latest in this debacle is the importing of our prescriptions — which includes Chinese backed counterfeits from factories in Africa.

  Similar “confidentiality agreements” which “precluded revealing the names” are also preventing law enforcement from getting info on the Virginia Tech Massacre shooter, even AFTER HE KILLED 32 PEOPLE!

  “The system broke down,” said Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) according to the April 6 Washington Post. “It’s not just about contaminated food killing pets, it’s a system that failed.”

  Durbin is a very vocal advocate of “feel-good” legislation in my home state. He personifies “the system.”

  This is PC inspired, feel-good stuff which has come back to haunt us. These companies may knowingly be doing us a disservice, it may be only that they do know they are vulnerable in our litigation happy society.

  Let’s get real about privacy/responsibility/profits/ security.

  Posted by whattheheck on Apr 24, 2007 at 7:34 AM

  Whattheheck, thanks for your comments.
  I have to agree with blondemike that you
  are far and away one of the most intelligent
  posters here. A refreshing contrast to the
  leftist dim bulbs who spout the same old,
  same old under multiple names.  We
  had Sarbanes here in Maryland who used
  Enron to put forth more draconian anti-
  business legislation. I am spacing on his
  replacement but I’m sure it’s another lefty.
  Baltimore County is blue collar Reagan
  Dems but the city is 80% black and votes
  robotically. Then Montgomery next to DC
  is home to govt workers and PG next door
  is 80% black. You can guess how they vote.

  Posted by bostonblackie on Apr 24, 2007 at 10:08 AM

  bostonblackie & mike,

  Thanks to both of you for the complimentary comments.

  It’s nice to hear, but I can’t get too puffed up since the intellectual competition here has been pretty weak lately.

  (Just kidding — don’t anyone get all buzzed off.)

  Posted by whattheheck on Apr 24, 2007 at 11:33 AM

  Even overlooking the idiocy of the opposition
  here, your posts have been outstanding for
  their thoughtfulness, WTH. So it’s NOT a
  left-handed compliment.

  Posted by bostonblackie on Apr 24, 2007 at 3:10 PM

  Mikey
  You are a strange old geezer. Do you switch up personas at will or is it a subconcious break that the id is not aware of. 

  Pet food..16 billion dollars........Thats insane. Its an animal. It eats crap and drinks from the toilet....People have more money than good sense..

  Posted by texasindependent on Apr 25, 2007 at 10:37 AM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 7 posts.

Member Login

Also by Terry J. Allen

• High Court May Immunize Big Pharma
  The FDA's new "preemption" doctrine jeopardizes consumers' right to sue for drug-caused injuries
• Change We Can Reasonably Assess
  
• McCain’s Aches and Pains
  
• On AIDS, Wright Is Wrong
  
• By the Sewers of Babylon
  
• As Hunger Rises, Chew on This