Your donations make In These Times affordable for all readers, including students and readers with low incomes. Please donate today.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > June 12, 2007

Thicker Than Oil

Iraq Veterans Against the War take the baton from their Vietnam-era counterparts

By Joel Bleifuss

At the end of May, the third bloodiest month of his 50-month Iraq War, President George W. Bush, red-white-and-blue wreath in hand, staged a Memorial Day photo op at Arlington National Cemetery with its freshly dug graves.

“Now this hallowed ground receives a new generation of heroes,” intoned Bush. “Our enemies long for our retreat. They question our moral purpose. … Yet even after five years of war, our finest citizens continue to answer our enemies with courage and confidence.”

At the same time, across the country “our finest citizens”—members of Iraq Veterans Against the War—gathered with courage, confidence and moral purpose, to give truth to the lies of this one-time oil executive who conned the nation into war.

Forty years ago, a turning point in the Vietnam War occurred when veterans returned home and founded the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. They took to the streets to demand the war’s end. This past Memorial Day, some of those same vets and their modern-day counterparts, Iraq Veterans Against the War, gathered at the Vietnam War Memorial in Chicago. In a small park on the banks of the Chicago River in the north Loop they commemorated fallen friends and condemned failed leaders.

Vince Emanuele, in the vets’ trademark desert camouflage, was among those who spoke. Now 23, this former lance corporal from Chesterton, Ind., a steel town 40 miles east of Chicago, graduated from high school in 2002 and joined the Marines. Home on leave in 2003, he saw Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 911. He returned to Iraq a vocal—and uniformed—opponent of the war.

In a quaking voice, he told the Memorial Day crowd how he had killed a man, and two days later saw his best friend die in a firefight. “I will be active in the antiwar movement until the day I die,” he told me the next day. “The war is a money-making machine. And it hurts to think of it that way. It hurts to know that you have been used.”

But knowledge is power, and armed with what they know, the Iraq Veterans Against the War are speaking out. Founded in 2004 and with a membership of about 500, the group is gaining 10 new members a week, a number bound to grow as soldiers who have served in Iraq opt not to re-enlist and return home, free to speak.

Standing in Arlington, cameras rolling, Bush told the nation, “Tens of thousands who have seen war on the battlefield volunteer to re-enlist.” He did not mention re-enlistment rates have fallen sharply. Indeed, the military now pays its soldiers rewards of up to $150,000 to convince them to “volunteer to re-enlist.”

Other soldiers go AWOL. In the last two years, desertions from the Army have risen 35 percent.

Luke, Leif and Leo Kamunen deserted on Jan. 2. Luke and Leif, 21-year-old twins, and Leo, their 20-year-old brother, are from the northern Minnesota town of Cloquet. Descendents of Finns, a famously independent ethnic group in the North Woods, the brothers came home on Christmas leave and, unbeknownst to each other, each decided not to return to base.

Leif, whose girlfriend had had a baby, told the Minneapolis Star Tribune, “Halfway through basic training, I didn’t want to be there anymore.”

Leo explained he met a woman he really liked. “I decided there was no way I could be apart from her for long periods of time when I didn’t feel so strongly about fighting for George Bush’s war.”

Luke said he overslept and missed his plane. “We saw each other a couple days later, and we’re saying, ‘What, you didn’t go back, either?’ “

For the Kamunens, blood is thicker than oil. And they are not alone in knowing that living at home beats dying in Iraq.

Joel Bleifuss is the editor of In These Times, where he has worked as an investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. Bleifuss has had more stories on Project Censored's annual list of the "10 Most Censored Stories" than any other journalist.

More information about Joel Bleifuss
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    I seriously doubt al Qaeda or Iraqi insurgents spend a lot of time “questioning our moral purpose.” Another reminder who the Republicans consider their “enemies.”

    Posted by monkyhead on Jun 12, 2007 at 6:37 AM

    With support for his arguments like Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 911” it’s not likely anything I have to say will change the author’s mind.

    I don’t know where the AWOLs, desertions and under filled quotas data comes from (he seldom lists his sources as long as it supports his view), but the latest data on MSM (a source of equal quality to Moore) refutes at least the enlistments YTD and except for the Army others this week were reported to be up.

    To save time I will simply insert my comments from the “These Guns for Hire” thread…

    No two wars are ever going to be exactly the same. All are largely unpredictable. Certainly there are similarities between Iraq and Viet Nam. If I were to pick a comparison, I would say our current situation is closest to the Indian Wars of 1870 -1880 in the US western states.

    The civilians were under attack by a diverse group of tribes who had a history of fighting each other. They had many legitimate grievances against the US as a nation, but those citizens under attack had little to do with the treatment of the tribes over a period of a century and a half — the same is true now. In tribal thinking — any individual on the “enemy” side is fair game.
    The Indians had strong religious backing, belief in a warrior’s reward for death in their cause, and often resorted to outrageous torture and mutilation.

    Both are primarily guerrilla wars with the enemy hard to positively identify.
    Had the US pulled its army back beyond the Mississippi the conflict would not have ended. The Indians would have perceived it as a sign of weakness on our part, vindication of their cause and been encouraged to pursue and increase the same methods.

    Eventually, to hold the tribes beyond the Mississippi, our military would have been sent back to start from an even less advantageous position.
    Note that the Indian Wars lasted a decade and there is still controversy over the morality.

    Posted by whattheheck on Jun 12, 2007 at 9:10 AM

    “For the Kamunens, blood is thicker than oil.”

    Or love of sleeping late and finding/banging a gf is more important that work of any sort. Lousy poster boys for the antiwar movement and sad excuses for proud Finns.

    Posted by wolf on Jun 12, 2007 at 9:30 AM

    Wolf,

    Ja fur sure!

    Half way through basic training don’t hardly nobody want to be der no more, Leo.

    The Finns put up a hell of a fight against the invading Soviets about 1938 or ‘39. My wife’s uncle went over from Sweden and joined them.

    When the international news media reported that the Ruskies were bombing Finland, Stalin’s Foreign Minister, Molotov claimed they were only “dropping bread to feed the hungry.”

    In return the Finns dug covered foxholes and as Soviet tanks went by they popped out and threw bottles of flamming gasoline down the hatches. They said they gave us “bread” so we gave them back “Molotov Cocktails. (How it got its name.)

    Posted by whattheheck on Jun 12, 2007 at 1:10 PM

    wth - Finland is also the only country that repaid its WWII debt fully. A proud and wonderful people and land (ok, i am biased, but proudly).

    Posted by wolf on Jun 12, 2007 at 1:53 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 9 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Joel Bleifuss
Popular Discussions