Bill Ayers speaks out! An In These Times exclusive.

PrintDiscuss
Views » April 4, 2004

Shades of 1983

By Salim Muwakkil

Obama’s crowd wasn’t diversity cobbled together by good intentions. This was people coming together with shared concerns and hopes—a genuine coalition.

As I surveyed the throng gathered March 16 in Chicago’s Hyatt Hotel to celebrate the primary victory of Illinois State Senator Barack Obama I experienced a sense of déjà vu. In 1983, I had stood among a similar crowd when Harold Washington won Chicago’s mayoral primary. Both crowds were celebrating the victory of a black candidate who began the campaign as a prohibitive underdog. But the most striking feature of both events, and the primary reason for my feelings of déjà vu, was the crowd’s racial diversity.

It wasn’t diversity cobbled together by good intentions. This was people coming together with shared concerns and hopes—a genuine coalition. Illinois residents of all ethnicities seem to trust that Obama will speak to their specific issues without bias. It is a kind of trust that Washington also inspired.

Obama won a stunning victory. In a field of seven, the 42-year-old state senator captured more than 52 percent of the vote. His closest competitor, State Comptroller Dan Hynes, polled less than 24 percent. The third finisher, Blair Hull, won 10 percent of the vote. Hull had been leading the field after spending $29 million of his own money on the race, but his campaign ran aground after divorce records revealed an incident of domestic violence.

Obama’s triumph catapulted him into the national limelight, and he has become the newest rising star in the Democrats’ firmament. The Harvard Law School graduate and University of Chicago lecturer is favored to win the Senate seat now held by retiring Republican Peter Fitzgerald. The son of a black Kenyan father and a white Kansan mother, Obama embodies our multicultural zeitgeist and would be just the third African American elected to the U.S. Senate since Reconstruction. The second was Carol Moseley Braun, also from Illinois.

Obama is favored to win in November. Illinois is leaning increasingly Democratic, and he demonstrated widespread appeal in the primary contest. Not only did he win Chicago and Cook County, where minority voters dominate, but he did surprisingly well in the predominately white “collar counties.”

But the election won’t be a cakewalk. Obama’s Republican opponent is Jack Ryan, a fellow Harvard graduate and novice politician, who defeated seven candidates to win the GOP primary. Ryan is a multimillionaire investment banker who quit his corporate job to teach in an inner-city high school.

The 44-year-old Ryan is an attractive candidate with a compelling personal story. But, pundits say, his moderate credentials don’t offer Republican voters much of a contrast with Obama, and he fails to excite the GOP base. What’s more, like Hull, his divorce records have been an ongoing source of controversy.

Obama’s candidacy took a while to catch on in the African-American community, but his popularity is growing fast. His campaign is being watched closely for what it may augur. Black candidates running in statewide elections traditionally face the dilemma of how to remain relevant to their base of support without alienating other voters: The black electorate demands their candidates push the same policies that turn off white voters needed to win. For a black candidate to win a statewide office requires that they maintain an exquisite political balance.

Some analysts argue that to win votes among the general electorate these new-school black candidates must move beyond racial grievance and civil rights modalities. Several black politicians have adopted this model, including Reps. Harold Ford Jr. (D-Tenn.) and Gregory W. Meeks (D-N.Y). Cory Booker, the Ivy League-educated candidate for mayor of Newark, N.J., also sought to embody this new-school mode in his unsuccessful run.

But many black voters are wary of such candidates and some initially withheld support for Obama because he was projected as such a post-race candidate. There even were rumors that he was cozying up to the Democratic Leadership Council.

But the candidate soon put those rumors to rest and—just as Harold Washington did 20 years earlier—mobilized significant support among Chicago’s influential Black Nationalist community. For Chicago’s African-American community, nationalist support generally confers political authenticity.

“I think it’s fair to say that the conventional wisdom was we could not win,” Obama told the packed hotel ballroom the night of his victory. “But we are here, from all across Illinois, suburbs, city, downstate, upstate, black , white, Hispanic, Asian.”

He was right, and the crowd cheered exuberantly. Among the cheers, I swear I heard the chant, “Harold, Harold, Harold.”

Salim Muwakkil is a senior editor of In These Times, where he has worked since 1983. He is currently a Crime and Communities Media Fellow of the Open Society Institute, examining the impact of ex-inmates and gang leaders in leadership positions in the black community.

More information about Salim Muwakkil
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Heard him on Air America Radio, and he sounds like someone important to vote for!

    Posted by Kyle Stoner on Apr 6, 2004 at 6:32 AM

    Obama has to watch for two amBushes in this election:

    1. Will the voting machines be programmed by Republican Rangers? 

    2. Will the Karl Rovers modify his name and his face to Osama? 

    Bushites don’t play by any rules but their own—like Hitler and Stalin. 

    Posted by Jim Wood on Apr 7, 2004 at 10:08 PM

    Obama has the opportunity to put to rest the Green left’s only partially correct claim that there is no difference between the Dems and the Reps.

    Posted by Joel on Apr 11, 2004 at 8:40 AM

    Sounds like Carol Mosley Bran all over again too me. What is one lone black man going to do that a million man march couldn’t do. We were ignored then and now, one comes to make us belive that he will have the power of millions.pleeeese. Obama just like Carol was rasied on milk from the tit of Americkkk ‘s curupt system. Tell me tell me! what is diffrent about him. So what if some progressive white like him. They can’t even protest againist the war in chicago. Oh yea where was Obama then. 

    Posted by Decal on Apr 19, 2004 at 5:45 PM

    I went back home to Chicago to work election day for Barack Obama.

    Actually when there were protests against the war in Chicago Barack Obama was there.  You can find one of the speeches he made at one of them on his site, or you can search the archives at www.blackcommentator.com, where we reprinted it.  We were the ones, by the way, who asked whether he was drifting rightward toward the DLC, which DID claim him, falsely as it turned out.

    And the Million Man March?  Pul-leaze.  If the folks that did that were the least bit serious about organizing anything, they would have at least taken names and addresses and phone numbers.  Can you imagine what a powerful tool a Million Man Mailing List would have been?  But no, they were concerned with other stuff.  Remember how Farrakhan used the prestige he got from the MMM?  He turned up a couple weeks later clasping aloft the bloodstained hand of Nigeria’s Sani Abacha claiming the world was after this good man cause he was a good Muslim. 

    At least Carol MB has admitted a mistake on that one.  Has da Minister?

    Posted by Bruce A. Dixon on Apr 27, 2004 at 12:09 PM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Appeared in the April 26, 2004 Issue
Also by Salim Muwakkil
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS