Features > April 22, 2005

Where Are the Women?

By Emily Udell

Jennifer Pozner

What Washington Post editor Zofia Smardz dubbed “Opiniongate” began when columnist and commentator Susan Estrich sent a letter to Los Angeles Times editorial page editor Michael Kinsley criticizing the gender inequity on his Op-Ed pages. Since then, women and men alike have been waxing punditic on the topic in print and online. When the (only female) New York Times Op-Ed columnist Maureen Dowd asserted, “We just need to find and nurture [women Op-Ed columnists],” The Nation’s Katha Pollitt responded: “Nurture, my eye. … I have seen men advance professionally on levels of aggression, self-promotion and hostility that would have a woman carted off to the loony bin.”

The dearth of women’s perspectives in mainstream media is no news to Jennifer Pozner, a widely-published media critic, journalist and public speaker, who is as conversant in the sexist nuances of “Desperate Housewives” as she is in the structural inequities in media management. In order to address the gender bias at all levels of media-making, Pozner founded Women In Media & News (WIMN) in 2002 with direction and input from activists in the feminist, anti-racist, LGBT and media reform communities. The organization was created to take a holistic approach to improving media for women—by combating misrepresentations of women in entertainment and news content, by working toward structural reform and equal representation of women at all levels of media and by giving grassroots organizers the tools they need to challenge media bias.

As part of her work for WIMN, Pozner travels to college campuses across the country, delivering multi-media presentations with evocative names like “Condoleezza Rice Is a Size 6 … and Other Things I Learned from the News.” With humorous aplomb, she delivers incisive critiques of the mainstream media. “We don’t just get our information from the news, we don’t just get our entertainment from pop culture,” she says. “We get both from both of those venues and we need to look at both of those venues pretty critically.”

“We really need to work with people where they are,” says Pozner. “The fact is that millions of people, many of them young girls, tune in to every episode of ‘The Bachelor’ to find out who will get to go home broken-hearted, and are being told that only the women with the lowest self-esteems, the lowest standards, and the lowest carb diets will be rewarded with love and security. Those people are not [bringing] a lot of critical, political approaches to these images.”

Pozner and WIMN are not only concerned with sexist depictions of women in entertainment programming, but the issues being raised in the ongoing Op-Ed debate. A Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) study of the nightly news programming at NBC, ABC and CBS found that only 9 percent of professional and political voices presented on the three major TV networks in 2001 (including during the lead-up to the war in Afghanistan) were women’s voices. Pozner interviewed producers from “Face the Nation” and “Meet the Press” to ask them why such a small percentage of guests talking about terrorism and war after 9/11 were women. One producer responded: “Our goal is to deliver the newsmakers, not to get women on the air.” Pozner scoffs, “As if ‘women’ and ‘newsmakers’ are mutually exclusive!”

To counter that kind of gender bias, Pozner is working to establish POWER (Perspectives of Women Expand Reporting) Sources, a free online database allowing producers and journalists to find articulate female experts from a variety of disciplines, from plumbing to politics to physics. In the lead-up to POWER Sources’ projected launch in 2006, Pozner is serving as the database herself, personally guiding reporters on a case-by-case basis to these experts.

Pozner has taken a multi-platform approach with WIMN to address feminists’ concerns that changing the number of women in the newsroom is not enough. As Alternet Senior Editor Lakshmi Chaudhry recently wrote, “The best women journalists are those who can write … about the so-called Big Issues without distancing themselves from their gender. Simply changing the demographics of the newsroom won’t change the product, especially not in the era of media consolidation.”

In other words, as Barbara Ehrenreich noted in a Los Angeles Times Op-Ed about Abu Ghraib, “To cite an old, and far from naive, feminist saying: ‘If you think equality is the goal, your standards are too low.’ It is not enough to be equal to men. … It is not enough to assimilate. We need to create a world worth assimilating into.”

Journalist Paula Kamen recently attended a fundraiser for WIMN in Chicago, and said the existence of WIMN gives her peace of mind. “It’s unsettling to think of being a feminist without it; that would mean there would be no known organization to act as a watchdog of the gargantuan corporate media and news industries,” says Kamen. “And when sexist distortion and belittlement does happen, WIMN is out there—it’s like a feminist media 911.”

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Yaaaawwwwwn!

  Posted by Lefty on Apr 22, 2005 at 10:03 AM

  Does this goal also apply to conservative women or only liberal ones?

  Posted by U Scare Me on Apr 22, 2005 at 11:22 AM

  Susan Estrich is a conservative commentator for Fox News, which is why she has issues with the LA Times.  Gee, do you get the feeling that lefty & U Scare Me aren’t supportive of feminism?  My favorite definition of feminism:  The radical notion that women are people too.

  My husband used to be bored by feminist issues also, then his teenage daughter started dressing and talking like the standard female role-models provided on TV.  Now he wishes he’d paid attention.  The next generation of women need to look out and see women in broadcasting, women in uniform, women in business in order to believe that they have these options.  That being the sluttiest around is not the only avenue to advancement.

  Of course, perhaps the right-wing wants girls to have that perspective???

  Posted by shogrenl on Apr 22, 2005 at 12:37 PM

  Of course they do.  You can’t maintain a patriarchal society if women have solid self-esteem.  Better to keep them cute & perky when they’re young....and hopeless & depressed when they’re not so ‘cute & perky’ anymore.  If a woman thinks she has self-worth, she might not be so dependant on men.  Thought control is power.

  Posted by Brighid Rose on Apr 22, 2005 at 1:42 PM

  Shogrenl,

  ***Susan Estrich is a conservative commentator for Fox News, which is why she has issues with the LA Times.***

  Let’s start by examining the biography of the conservative Fox News contributor, Susan Estrich:

  Special Assistant, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, 1980-81; Lecturer, Harvard Law School, 1980-81; Executive Director, Democratic National Platform Committee, 1984; Senior Policy Advisor, Mondale-Ferraro Campaign, 1984; Assistant Professor of Law, 1981-86, Harvard Law School; Of Counsel, Tuttle & Taylor, 1986-87; National Campaign Manager, Dukakis for President Campaign, 1987-88.  Susan continues to serve in an advisory capacity to the DNC and advises my top Democratic candidates.

  Referring to Susan Estrich as a conservative is like calling Maureen Dowd a Neocon.
  Susan Estrich may very well become a Republican after she has been attacked so viscously by liberals for doing what?  Standing up and speaking up about the unfair treatment of women by the LA Times and being on Fox News.  This is what I love about the liberal elite…do as I say, not as I do.

  Where I see the most explicit examples of the exploitation of women is in areas hardly associated with conservatives.  Hollywood, Hip-Hop music and the fashion industry. 

  ***That being the sluttiest around is not the only avenue to advancement.
  Of course, perhaps the right-wing wants girls to have that perspective???***
  
  I believe it was the previous Commander In Chief that liked to surround himself with sluts. The only problem I have with the Feminist movement is when it excludes conservative women.  In your definition, is it possible for a woman to be a role model and conservative?  Can you look at Sec of State Albright and Sec of State Rice and be equally proud of their contributions as role models to young women?  If not, you are swimming in a sea named Hypocrisy.

  Posted by U Scare Me on Apr 22, 2005 at 1:50 PM

• extended discussion >>>Continued...

  Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 32 posts.

Member Login

Also by Emily Udell

• Selling Out Grandma
  
• Dark Side of Russias Rainbow
  Despite political, legal and religious pressures, Nikolai Alexeyev has worked to combat prejudice and secure legal and political protections for Russia's lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community
• Putting the IRS to Political Use?
  
• The Gossip
  
• Where Are the Women?
  
• Keeping the Faith