Donate today and get a free, signed copy of Rick Perlstein's new book Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America!
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > May 9, 2005

Black Clergy Rebuff Bush

By Salim Muwakkil

In January, the nation's four largest black Baptist groups issued a joint statement repudiating the GOP's outreach efforts.
Tags   

During the run-up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the Rev. Al Sampson helped to organize Chicago’s Black Mobilization Committee Against the War and regularly opened his church to anti-war rallies and other progressive actions. His Fernwood United Methodist Church, on Chicago’s far South Side, showed films like Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism and Fahrenheit 9/11.

And Sampson’s church is just one of many in Chicago that aggressively confronts the Bush administration’s cynical attempt to capture black mind share with its focus on God, gays and vouchers.

As I noted in my last column, the GOP is trying to hitch a ride on Christian piety into the black community. But that ride is getting rather bumpy. In January, an unprecedented gathering of the nation’s four largest black Baptist groups issued a joint statement that basically repudiated the thrust of the GOP’s outreach efforts. The group gave short shrift to issues like same-sex marriage and abortion, heavily pushed by Bush’s evangelical supporters.

And that was intentional. The Baptists sought to convey their irritation with the GOP’s focus on such peripheral issues rather than on the real concerns of black Americans. The joint statement represented the National Baptist Convention (NBUSA), the National Baptist Convention of America Inc., the Progressive National Baptist Convention Inc. and the National Missionary Baptist Convention of America. The NBUSA is the largest black religious group in the nation, with 7 million members. Together the four groups represent about 15 million black Baptists.

“My position on same-sex marriage is not that it is the sole determinant on moral issues,” NBUSA President William Shaw told the New York Times. “Marriage is threatened more by adultery, and we don’t have a constitutional ban on that.”

The Rev. Jesse Jackson, himself a Baptist minister, was a special speaker at the January convention. In a recent interview, he explained to In These Times how he helped unmask the GOP’s distracting tactics. “I asked them [the thousands of delegates] how many wanted a higher minimum wage, a stable Social Security system, more effective affirmative action and an end to the war in Iraq, and thousands of hands were raised,” he said. “Then I asked them how many of them were in churches that blessed same-sex unions, and no hands went up. ‘Now,’ I asked them, ‘how did that get in the middle of our agenda?’”

Jackson’s rhetorical question directly revealed how the GOP seeks to employ symbol over substance, and it may well have been instrumental in framing the group’s final statement. The first item of the nine-point statement made clear that these black Baptists were far from the Bush plantation. “We call for an end to the war in Iraq and withdrawal of U.S. military personnel from Iraq,” it reads. Other points call for the extension of the Voting Rights Act, opposition to the confirmation of Alberto Gonzales as attorney general, “full commitment to the public education system,” and opposition to school vouchers. The statement characterizes the administration’s budget cuts in Medicaid and the CHIP program as immoral, calls for an end to the prison-industrial complex and … well, you get the point. These are not Bush folks.

And since this group represents, by far, the largest number of African-American Christians, it’s safe to say that the black church has not yet fallen under the faith-based spell of the GOP. The Republicans’ stress on hot-button cultural issues has swayed some individual black believers to the right, but that’s nothing new.

“When Gabriel Prosser, Denmark Vesey and Nat Turner heard the voice of God telling them to stand up and fight for freedom, there were other black Christians (Africans from the continent who were also in bondage!) who felt that liberation was not as important as cooperation,” wrote the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. in a recent editorial in The Trinity Trumpet, the publication of his church, Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. He noted that many in the black church also were critical of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. “Cooperation was the agenda for those black Christians, not liberation,” Wright wrote. The GOP is hoping that faith-based funding will sweeten the pot for that kind of cooperation.

But the party seems to be overreaching. The brazen linkage of faith-based goodies to GOP allegiance has troubled black religious conservatives. “Federal grants will change the way churches think about how to serve their communities,” wrote Star Parker, a prominent black conservative, in a February 1 syndicated column. “Time, energy and creativity will no longer be focused on coming up with creative solutions to problems but on how to structure programs to qualify for grants.” She added, “It’s the nature of politics that money and favors go hand in hand.”

If faith-based funding smells like bribery even to some of Bush’s strongest supporters, its rancid odor is likely to keep the GOP stuck on the black church’s back steps.

Salim Muwakkil is a senior editor of In These Times, where he has worked since 1983, and an op-ed columnist for the Chicago Tribune. He is currently a Crime and Communities Media Fellow of the Open Society Institute, examining the impact of ex-inmates and gang leaders in leadership positions in the black community.

More information about Salim Muwakkil
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Great article, it’s about time black people woke up and smelled the coffee.  Black people should really start taking the voting process more serious.  I mean we should strive to learn our history in this country, once that has been done the right decisions will be made.  I mean it is no mistake that blacks still vote 9/10 for democratic candidates.  I am by no means saying that all democratics candidates mean us well, however the answer is definetly not running to the “Gran Ole Party”.  I encourge every black person just to go back to the first George Bush Presidency and check out a guy named Lee Atwater…

    Posted by Maria Holt on May 10, 2005 at 9:10 AM

    Black people are a diverse group. They have no more in common than the Irish or Jews (really less). The real demographic is NOT race based in any way - rather it is class based.

    We should all leave this dead horse alone. AA should be eliminated and replaced with a class based analogy.

    It past time to move on.

    Posted by Ruth on May 10, 2005 at 11:11 AM

    I have long said that many AAs were not drinking Bush’s Kool-Aid, and your article confirms it.  Additionally, those who HAVE either drunk the Kool-Aid or fed at Bush’s Faith-Based Money trough will have to shill his policies for him whether they are beneficiaries or not.

    And Star “I used to fraudently take welfare before I was against it” Parker has never been a credible source of information regarding the AA community because she’s too busy trashing it for her own personal gain.  Someone was definately drunk on Kool-Aid when they decided to give her a syndicated newspaper column.

    Posted by Leutisha on May 10, 2005 at 4:47 PM

    Is it just me,or has anyone else noticed that Bush’s constituency has been reduced to big business interests and a bunch of dumb-ass pseudo-middle-class white guys who honestly believe the propaganda on Fox News?

    Some mandate.

    With thirty-seven people voting republican in the next election,I wonder how they’ll steal that one?

    Posted by wwoods on May 11, 2005 at 6:35 AM

    All they will do is rig the election and say that 37,000 Republicans voted for them.  Even if those Republicans punched the button that said “Democrat” - you know Diebold got those voting machines programmed.

    People better ignore the machines and vote by absentee ballot, or mail-in ballot; it’s the only way to create and maintain a paper trail.

    Posted by Leutisha on May 11, 2005 at 12:52 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 11 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues


Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington

Popular Discussions