Read Senior Editor Susan J. Douglas's 8 reasons to make a tax-deductible donation to In These Times.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Supplementary > July 6, 2005

Old Terrain, New Insights

By Ron Radosh

James Weinstein: The Legacy

Not a Dead Ender
By G. William Domhoff
Old Terrain, New Insights
By Ron Radosh
Muckraker By Studs Terkel
Creative Devotion
By David Moberg
Unapologetic Radical
By Laura Washington
The Historian We Need
By Michael Kazin
Guts and Tenacity
By Scott McLemee
Ambiguious Legacy
By James B. Gilbert
Throw Off the Saddles and Dare to Think By Edward "Buzz" Palmer
Last Request By Melissa Byrne
To a Friend
By Adrian Bleifuss Prados

As many of you readers of ITT probably know, Jimmy Weinstein and I parted as political comrades more than a decade ago.

That political change did not reduce my respect for Jimmy as a historian, public intellectual and man of honor and integrity.

Jimmy showed his strength and commitment to the truth when, in the face of nasty personal attacks, he defended the 1983 book Joyce Milton and I wrote, The Rosenberg File, in which we argued that Julius Rosenberg was a Soviet spy. Indeed, Jim sat me down way back in 1977 and told me, when I was becoming involved with the Meeropols’ Committee To Re-Open the Rosenberg Case, that he thought it was a foolish endeavor, and that he believed Julius Rosenberg was probably guilty.

When my research confirmed Jimmy’s suspicions, he stood by me and the book, despite threats from contributors to pull money out of In These Times. Indeed, he gave the book a lengthy favorable review in these very pages. And in the debate we held with Walter and Miriam Schneir at Town Hall in New York City in 1984, Jim publicly said, to a cascade of boos, that when he was a Communist, his own ignorance and naiveté were such that if he had been asked to spy for Stalin, he would have willingly done so. Indeed, Jimmy left the ranks of the Communist Party once he realized the truth about Stalin’s crimes, and understood the consequences for American radicalism for those whose primary commitment was to Moscow, and not to the United States.

We will not see his like soon again.

Ron Radosh, one of In These Times' founding sponsors, is co-author of Red Star Over Hollywood: The Film Colony's Long Romance with the Left and a senior adjunct fellow at The Hudson Institute.

More information about Ron Radosh
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Excuse me but you have a hell of nerve,
    Radosh, in showing your neocon lying face
    in here. We did not need you to prove the
    Rosenbergs were Communist spies but the more
    important question is how people at their
    relatively low level could have gotten the
    a-bomb secrets. It had to be someone of the
    stature of Oppenheimer to pull off something
    like that.
    But you spew all sorts of filth against opponents
    of the war and of Israel’s racist, fascist policies on that cretin Horowitz’s website.
    You have a hell of a nerve showing up here
    and then mostly to plug yourself !
    You are part of the statist-collectivist-
    Michael Savage neonazi garbage mouth Right.
    You are not a public intellectual but a bought
    and paid for neocon hack.
    You are and never were of the slightest importance, buster !
    Bad cess to you !!!

    Posted by Martin on Jul 6, 2005 at 1:42 PM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Ron Radosh

Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington

Popular Discussions