Donate today and get a free, signed copy of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Features > February 1, 2006

Walking to Guantnamo

Peace marchers aim to keep the abuse of ‘enemy combatants’ visible

By Frida Berrigan

The march to Guantánamo

It was tough getting used to being a spectacle, but that is exactly what we were—a motley gaggle of gringos walking through Cuba in short pants and matching gray T-shirts that read “Witness Against Torture: A March to Visit the Prisoners at Guantánamo.” Wearing straw hats and sunglasses, we trailed clouds of sunscreen and bug spray.

Our journey did not start on a Cuban road. We had met and prepared for months to get to this point. Our conversations started as an exploration of ways to resist the “war on terrorism” and respond to the suffering of its victims—and ways to do that as Christians in the tradition of the Catholic Worker movement. Dorothy Day, one of its founders, is famous for having called privileged Catholics out of their church pews and into the streets, where they put the works of mercy—feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, visiting the prisoners—into action. Day also emphasized resisting what she called the “filthy rotten system” of war and injustice that keeps people poor and homeless.

When men imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station went on a hunger strike this summer, we knew what to do: walk from Santiago—Cuba’s second largest city—to the U.S. base with the intention of visiting the prisoners. We figured we were only taking up an invitation President Bush made to European Union leaders last year in response to allegations of torture and human rights abuses there. “You’re welcome to go down yourselves … and tak[e] a look at the conditions,” Bush said.

By walking, we would deal transparently and openly with the Cuban government and we would draw strength from the rich history of nonviolent marches for social and political change—from Gandhi’s salt march to the Selma-Montgomery March to the Continental Peace March.

Of course, it was illegal for us to go to Cuba and Cubans themselves cannot march in protest without permission from their government. But it is no coincidence that the torture and abuse at the U.S. prison camp are hidden in a far corner of a foreign territory. The site was chosen with the cynical expectation that the prisoners would be beyond the reach of international law and investigation. Behind borders, and fences and oceans, their suffering would also be muted and remote. So, we went.

Our walk began in Santiago de Cuba on December 7 and over five days we walked about 70 miles, camping on the side of the road at night. Sometimes we walked in silence, meditating on the stories of prisoners in Guantánamo. I walked, thinking about Mohamed and Murat.

Mohamed el Gharani was 14 when he was arrested in an October 2001 raid on a religious school in Pakistan. Transferred to Guantánamo a few months later, he was subjected to routine and terrible abuse. According to his lawyer, Clive Stafford Smith, the Chad-born teenager had been singled out for mistreatment because he vocally objected to being called “nigger.” Mohamed is not the only juvenile imprisoned at Guantánamo Bay. Eight more teenagers are detained and five others have been released.

Murat Kurnaz was born to a Turkish family in Bremen, Germany. After September 11, 2001, he traveled to learn more about Islam in Pakistan, where he was arrested. He was eventually sent to Guantánamo where he remains in legal limbo. As the son of “guest-workers,” Kurnaz does not have German citizenship, even though he was born there. For a long time, Turkish officials maintained that Kurnaz was German and not their problem. Even after conceding their responsibility, Ankara has not pressured Washington to release Kurnaz. His mother begs “for a sign that my son is alive, that he is being treated justly, that he has not been tortured.”

After reflecting on the nightmares Mohammed and Murat have lived for more than four years now, I would resurface to marvel at the beauty of the countryside. As we walked, Cubans shared greetings, encouragement and most often incredulous exclamations like “a Guantánamo, caminando? A pied? Es bien lejos!” “Walking to Guantánamo? On foot? It is really far!”

On Sunday, December 11, after a long day’s walk on a busy road, we came to La Glorieta, a dusty little town near the end of our journey—the Cuban military checkpoint. The road forked and we were not sure which way to go. To the right, we could see the road blocked by a gate guarded by uniformed men. With Cuban television cameras rolling and the whole town out to watch us go by, we regrouped, forming two lines for our walk to the checkpoint.

I tried to be solemn as we approached the gate, but it seemed rude not to acknowledge all the people who had gathered. But as we got closer, I grew more serious. We planned to make a formal request to the Cuban military to be allowed to proceed through their checkpoint to the military territory it protected so we could hold our vigil closer to the American security perimeter.

It was an enormous and improbable request. The U.S. base at Guantánamo is a source of anger and fear for the Cuban people and their government. The United States annexed the 45-square-mile territory during the Spanish-American War and has held it ever since. Even if the Cuban military allowed us through their gate, there was still a mined no man’s land between us and the American naval base.

As we got closer to the gate to make our formal request, we saw a big sign next to the gate that says “Jao Sal.” It was a salt refining complex, not the military checkpoint. Oops. The serious, intrepid American activists who had come so far had to parade through the whole town again as we tried to find the real military checkpoint.

A half-mile farther down the road, we found a sturdy fence guarded by soldiers, men and women dressed in dark camouflage, their faces hidden below brimmed hats. We walked to the line of soldiers and read out loud an account of the hunger strike at Guantánamo from The Independent. We requested entry to address the crimes of our own government. The captain firmly refused to allow us through, but invited us to cross the white line separating civilian and military territory “as a gesture of solidarity with your cause.”

Inside the huge base, which straddles both sides of the Guantánamo bay, is Cuba’s only McDonald’s, a state-of-the-art recreation and sports facilities for American soldiers and their families, two airstrips, and a desalinization plant, because Cuba had cut off the base’s water supply. Somewhere in this far-flung slice of stripmall Americana are Camp Delta, Camp Echo, Camp Iguana and Camp V, where Murat, Mohammed and 500 other men are imprisoned.

We set up our camp along the Cuba fence, five miles from the prison, closer than Mohamed’s father or Murat’s mother have been to their sons in years. The dust and scrub brush next to the fence was our home for the next four days as we prayed and fasted. There, I thought of the scores of men on hunger strike. The only way to draw attention to their plight is to deepen their own suffering. Our fast was not a hunger strike, but it was long enough that cravings for food turned to actual hunger, and hunger turned into a peculiar light-headedness and clarity. It was long enough to realize that hunger is a violent act against biology, to reflect on the depth of powerlessness and despair—as well as the intensity of will and defiance—that informs the decision to fast to death. The authorities at Guantánamo reported that on Christmas the number of men refusing to eat had doubled to 84.

Our principal aim in going to Guantánamo—walking, vigiling and fasting—was to let the prisoners know that they were not alone. Despite the reflexive fear Americans have been inculcated to have toward the so-called “worst of the worst” held in Guantánamo, coverage of our witness in the U.S. press was positive and extensive. Our march and fast received widespread attention in the international press, including Arabic language outlets. All of that, combined with a network of lawyers representing prisoners who brought news of our proximity and solidarity to the men, means they knew we had tried, and are still trying.

While we await notice from the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, the agency responsible for violations of the ban on travel to Cuba, we will not be idle. On March 1, those of us who marched to Guantánamo are organizing an action in Washington, D.C., to make the prison and its victims visible to those who are responsible for the torture and abuse. We continue to meet and plan, working to build a campaign to close Guantánamo, free those prisoners who are innocent of any crime and bring the United States back into accordance with international law. Join us.

  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    I admire your courage and determination Ms. Berrigan. I stand in solidarity with you and all of the innocent prisoners at Guantanamo.

    Posted by Liberal on Feb 1, 2006 at 6:19 PM

    Guanatanamo should be made visible to the US public. Or, more properly phrased, they should not be allowed to forget it (which many I’ve heard from have a real talent for doing!).

    “We don’t want to be held back by the law. What we need to do is more important than that we act within it.”

    When the extra-legal prison at Gitmo was created, this was what I could imagine them saying. If they were ever to be truly candid, that is.

    Charge them, try them, get the mf’n due process in gear, or release them.

    Posted by Kuya on Feb 2, 2006 at 2:41 AM

    Thank you to all of the marchers for being so willing to put your beliefs into action, for taking such a strong stand, and going all out to help bring the world’s attention to something that is an affront to those who truly care about justice and human rights.

    Guantanamo defies all standards of basic decency in how any human beings should be treated, and stands as testament to the utter hypocrisy and absurdity of the lies about ‘freedom’, ‘democracy’, etc. that the Bush administration keeps proclaiming to be spreading abroad, while they surveil, ignore, supress, and prosecute the ‘democratic’ voice of dissent at home.

    Your actions are an inspiration to all of us who know our government is taking a wrong turn down a very dark path away from everything that is best in human ideals.  You have shone a spotlight into that darkness, and, like Guantanamo whistle-blower chaplain James Lee, show us a powerful image of where this country is going wrong and needs to turn away from it’s present descent, and the need to find our way to a higher road. 

    When we find that better way, hopefully we can look back on this period - at places like Abu Graib and Guantanamo, as well as the many detention centers within this country where people are warehoused and forgotten, often for years - the same way we look back at Japanese internment camps during WWII or Alcatraz, or medieval dungeons and other antiquated hell-holes, as reflecting a darker, less enlightened period of human evolution.

    Posted by snopeace on Feb 5, 2006 at 3:21 AM

    Correction:  In the previous posting, meant to say James ‘Yee’ , NOT ‘Lee’…

    His book is highly recommended reading!!

    Posted by snopeace on Feb 5, 2006 at 3:28 AM

    The imprisonment of hundreds of prisoners at guatanamo bay without legal recourse either in US courts or international law, being denied either a writ of habeus corpus or the scrutiny of international human rights organizations is a modern tyranny which must be challenged no less than that of the Taliban or Saddam Hussien.  It is the penultimate US hypocracy!  Niether Rumsfeld nor anyone in charge of the facility has come forward with any evidence as to why any of these men should be kept in detention.  If there was solid evidence of there connections to terrorism there would be ample displays of such in the US and international media.  The silence on such evidence can only be taken as an indication that there is none and that the reasons for holding these men is mostly an unprecendentedly cruel and twisted form of symbolic politics which furthers, through its hideous imagery, the warmongering Bush agenda.

    Let the Justice Dept. or the US military engage in the transparency required of a western democracy and stop hiding behind the 9/11 cliche in order to violate international law and every common norm of international repect for human rights and decency.  Let them establish an internationally accepted and mandated mode of dealing with these individuals or free them.  If they are being held on the grounds of committing terrorism let them have a publically open trial. 

    Holding prisoners incognito and indefinately for the purposes of torture and interrogation is illegal and immoral!  It violates every known norm of legal due process in the tradition of western democracies.  Whether or not these individuals are from such democracies is irrelevant!  The epthet “enemy combatant” has no true legal definition in ANY legal system and is not a legal category under which one’s legal status and treatment may be defined and mandated.

    The US Supreme Court decision of the Summer of 2004, in which Justice Sandra Day O’Conner wrote the Court’s Opinion in the Hamdi Case, clearly stated, “going to war does not give the executive a blank check...”, with regard to the treatment of individuals (especially US citizens like Yasir Hamdi) under the law.  Let’s remember this ruling from one of American legal history’s most moderate and prudent Jurists and hold the Bush Regime accountable to democratic norms of justice and due process of law.

    Posted by cabdriverinchicago on Feb 5, 2006 at 1:20 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 10 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Frida Berrigan

Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of David Sirota's New York Times bestseller The Uprising: An Unauthorized Tour of the Populist Revolt Scaring Wall Street and Washington

Popular Discussions