Features > January 25, 2008

Tupperware and Tasers

By Silja J.A. Talvi

The SUV-driving, stun-gun-wielding housewife is coming to a suburb near you. In Arizona, Tupperware-style Taser parties have become all the rage, thanks to the enterprising savvy of saleswoman Dana Shafman, founder of Shieldher Inc.

Shafman’s little soirees aren’t just popular, they’re also highly profitable. Over light conversation and snacks, women are invited to handle the palm-sized C2, the latest (and smallest) civilian version of a Taser stun gun. The C2 is also the most affordable Taser to hit the market, starting at $299.99—with an option to upgrade the C2 with a $50 laser beam to better the chances of debilitating a human target. Because practice makes perfect, the women in attendance are encouraged to grab a C2 and take turns shooting at a cardboard cutout representing a male attacker.

“I felt that we have Tupperware parties and candle parties to protect our food and house, so why not have a Taser party to learn how to protect our lives and bodies?” Shafman told the the Arizona Republic. Shafman projects that the parties will be held in at least a half-dozen other states by March.

The C2 comes in four iPod-matching metallic colors: “Hot pink” has been the top seller since the weapon hit the consumer market last summer. While the company admits that men, too, might benefit from carrying the mini-stunner, Taser’s marketing strategy has been directed at the phobic and fashion-forward female consumer.

Last July, the New York Times previewed the C2’s debut with a feature article titled, “Feeling Secure With a Little Shocking Pink.” Accompanying the article was a glamour-action photo of Taser International President Kathy Hanrahan with the weapon in hand. Hanrahan made no bones about the C2’s direct marketing strategy and conceptual design: “It’s a woman’s product,” she said.

In a number of promotional media appearances and technology conference presentations since that time, Taser officials have even gone so far as to dub the C2 the “Lady Taser.”

“When you’re going out to a nightclub or you have the device clipped onto your belt at a business meeting, you don’t want to look like Dirty Harry,” company spokesperson Steve Tuttle told ABC News last summer.

In what could have easily passed as a terribly tacky infomercial, ABC News ran a December 2007 “Money Matters” segment praising the palm-sized stunner as an exciting holiday gift for women, in which anchor Laura Marquez described the C2 as a “Taser with a softened look.”

Despite a plethora of headline-making news over the course of the year—including the notorious “Don’t Tase Me, Bro” incident during Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) University of Florida speech in September 2007—ABC News showcased Taser’s own video montage of alleged male criminals being stunned into submission. For the ABC News segment, the network opted for a large-font text banner to accompany the images: “Tasers Sold to Protect Women.”

None of those video snippets actually depicted women being attacked, and the network’s Taser-friendly sloganeering (and Marquez’s ridiculously soft-balled questions) didn’t seem coincidental in the least.

The Scottsdale, Ariz., corporation has spent years honing a relentless public relations campaign—complete with a Rolodex of at-the-ready medical, legal and law enforcement stun technology “experts”—that seems to have convinced many news outlets that Taser’s word is gospel truth.

The success of Taser’s C2 sales over the past several months can largely be attributed to the company’s aggressive strategy to play on women’s worst fears of assault and rape. While the C2 might look cute, it is utterly debilitating—a serious step up, as it were, from older self-defense products like mace and pepper spray.

Just as with the “professional” model, a triggered mini stun gun shoots out two, thin nitrogen-fueled wires with dart-like tips that penetrate clothing and embed in the skin. These darts are juiced to deliver an incapacitating 50,000 volts of electricity for 30 uninterrupted seconds—ostensibly to allow the Taser-wielder to make a quick getaway.

Aside from the various bells and whistles that would appeal to paramilitary-minded weapon owners, the key difference between C2s and the much more costly civilian and “professional” versions of X-26s is that they enable the “stunner” to shock the “stunnee” over and over again.

Whether we’re talking about cutesy mini-stunners, or their beefed-up big brothers, Taser has become a household name and a veritable pop culture phenomenon rooted in either opposition or celebration of this futuristic weapon that was once but a gleam in Gene Roddenberry’s creative eye. (Unlike the Taser, the sci-fi Star Trek “phaser” could specifically be set to a specific stun level, all the way up to a deadly jolt.)

Devoted Trekkies with “Set Phasers to Stun!” T-shirts were likely never the cool kids on the block, but “Don’t Tase Me, Bro” bumper stickers and T-shirts are a different story. Some are wearing the shirts to express their outrage toward the prevalence of Tasers in use by “campus cops” on college, high school, middle school and even elementary school grounds—as well as in political demonstrations as a terrifying method of crowd control.

But you might be just as likely to spot a clean-cut fraternity member wearing the same shirt—only to find that he hasn’t given a thought as to whether being hit repeatedly with 50,000 volts of electricity should be considered an act of torture.

• subscribe to print magazine

  First Name Last Name Home Address City State Zip Code Email

  2-year, 24-issues, $44.95 1-year, 12-issue, $24.95

• stay in touch with our email newsletter

  Subscribe to our regular weekly e-mail newsletter. It's packed with updates on recent and upcoming stories, events, campaigns and things every progressive should be informed about.

   

• email this article to a friend

  Your Name Your Email Recipient Email

  Personal message Thought you might be interested in this article from In These Times.

   

  Please help us prevent spam by verifying the word you see in the image above

  Send to multiple recipients. Just separate each email address with a comma.

• Reader Comments

  Tasers are a great improvement over lethal weapons. While they can cause death, they are far less likely to do real damage than guns or other weapons (knives, etc). They are also easy to use by the most vulnerable of us. The fact that they are abused (rarely) merely means that they are operated by humans. The lame attempt to categorize their use as torture is silly (hey, mace in the eyes is torture too, don’t ya think?)!

  Banning tasers makes almost as much sense as banning knives. Stabbing, now that is torture and the effects last much longer than tasing in the vast majority of cases!

  Posted by wolf on Jan 28, 2008 at 11:09 AM

  As with any weapon, an individual must reckon with the possibility, indeed the likelihood, of that weapon being taken FROM them ... and used ON them. 

  Training to use a weapon, whether it be a knife, a gun, a taser ... or any other implement of violence, is necessary to minimize these kinds of accidents. For women in particular, a weapon may be easily wrested from her.  But, if she learns some karate and other martial arts that teach a person how to use their assailants size and weight against him, she may be better off.

  Posted by GillianB on Jan 30, 2008 at 5:00 PM

  After reading the 2nd half of the article, as compared to the 1st half, I think I’d trust the ladies at Taser parties before I’d trust law enforcement with the use of Tasers.  In the examples of how tasers have been used with deadly force, virtually all of them were a result of police officers abusing their discretion.  They can’t be trusted with them, and are using them in a very reactionary fashion.  And I saw that all of the incidents described could have been defused if a little calm and reason were shown by the police.  The fact that reason is being replaced with tasering is very dangerous.  A taser should be like a gun, in that it’s used in the course of an officer’s job as an absolute last resort.  These officers have it the other way around, they’re tasering first and asking questions later.  So, although originally intended for law enforcement, and I know the irony in this, police should be prohibited from using them.  They should be for personal use only, as a way for someone to protect herself.

  Posted by jblanch3 on Feb 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM

  I am the mother of a young girl that was tased at a school in Ohio. all becasue she took a stand and was tired of being told to get out of the class room whenever a white student would call her the N - word .
  if there could be any way I could replay the whole incident and never send her to a school like that I would. My daughter still has nightmares of police dragging her small frail body down the hall and cursing at her in all manner of derogative terms possible and then while four policeman held her up in the air by her arms and feet above the stairs in the school they all let her go and dropped her body on the stairs.
  I can not believe such cruelty still exisist but it does.  I had to move her into another school district, pay for two homes to get her out of this racist community.  If you want to get away with some real crimes join the Police department.

  Posted by smawstuff on Feb 20, 2008 at 3:11 PM

• register a new account »Posting Security

  To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.

  Username Password

    Remember me
  

  Retreive lost password »

Member Login

Also by Silja J.A. Talvi

• Reporting From The Ground Up
  The power of street reporting
• Seattle Battles the Homeless
  
• Women Behind Bars
  War on drugs leads to explosion of female incarcerations
• Tupperware and Tasers
  
• Suffering Secondary Trauma
  Finding Iris Chang: Friendship, Ambition and the Loss of an Extraordinary Mind explores the complexity of Chang's psychology as it formed around the demands of her profession and her personal struggles stemming from her writing about The Rape of Nanking
• Justice Denied
  One man stands between Flozelle Woodmore and the "free" world--California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger